AMG GT R posts blistering Nurburgring lap time
AMG GT R posts blistering Nurburgring lap time
Author
Discussion

CitySlicker

Original Poster:

360 posts

114 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Sport Auto have published a video today of the AMG GT R lapping the Nurburgring in a scarcely believable 7:10.96! That slots the car firmly into the top10 fastest production times knocking the Gumpert Apollo Speed into 8th place according to nurburgringlaptimes.com.

That's mighty impressive, nothing within the same price bracket or usability gets close; for prospective the Ferrari 488 laps the ring in a 7:21.63.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AtXzca-zSY

Interesting to see how it performs against the race car which passes at 3:22

turbobloke

115,193 posts

281 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
CitySlicker said:
Interesting to see how it performs against the race car which passes
yes


popeyewhite

23,008 posts

141 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
At 3.40 the Merc is catching the race car. Impressive stuff.

Yipper

5,964 posts

111 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
It is a good lap.

The Nissan GT-R Nismo is 2 seconds faster round the Nurb and almost half the price of an AMG GT R.

Terminator X

19,221 posts

225 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
At 6:51 he takes the bend at 300kmh!

TX.

TIGA84

5,505 posts

252 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
At 6:51 he takes the bend at 300kmh!

TX.
The next bit through the compression and up the hill is scarier.....

likesachange

2,648 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
It is a good lap.

The Nissan GT-R Nismo is 2 seconds faster round the Nurb and almost half the price of an AMG GT R.
Thought the nismo was 120k?

MDL111

8,381 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
It is a good lap.

The Nissan GT-R Nismo is 2 seconds faster round the Nurb and almost half the price of an AMG GT R.
Not sure about double the price (I thought the Nismo was quite expensive) and not sure the Nismo is that fast in the hands of Sport Auto. This time is faster than the time they set with the 918.

EDIT: Just checked the Nismo costs 20k more than the GT R (185k vs 165k) as far as I can tell.

Edited by MDL111 on Thursday 8th December 15:31

Yipper

5,964 posts

111 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Update...

Nismo = ~£125k;
AMG = ~£143k.

So, the Nismo is ~£18k cheaper and 2 seconds faster. Both great cars.

MDL111

8,381 posts

198 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Well, I looked at prices in Germany
Even at yours a far cry from double in any case

ZeroH

2,914 posts

210 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
It is a good lap.

The Nissan GT-R Nismo is 2 seconds faster round the Nurb and almost half the price of an AMG GT R.
I think you need to compare apples with apples. Not manufacturers claimed times with independently tested times

No independent test that I know of has ever gotten close to Nissan's ring claims - e.g. the 2011 GTR was lapped by AMS in 7m34 at a time when Nissan was claiming 7m20.

7min10 is an astonishing time by the Merc - like the sls at the ring, it looks incredibly stable at speed.

popeyewhite

23,008 posts

141 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
Update...

Nismo = ~£125k;
AMG = ~£143k.

So, the Nismo is ~£18k cheaper and 2 seconds faster. Both great cars.
...Surprising really, to look at the Nismo you'd think it was worth far less... .biggrin

Olivera

8,371 posts

260 months

Thursday 8th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
Update...

Nismo = ~£125k;
AMG = ~£143k.

So, the Nismo is ~£18k cheaper and 2 seconds faster. Both great cars.
Your update is still wrong.

The GTR lap time was set in the Nismo model with optional N attack package, containing lots of carbon parts, ohlins dampers and high downforce kit. IIRC the price was at least £170k, possibly more.

The Surveyor

7,617 posts

258 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
That's very impressive. It's a fantastic time but doesn't look rushed or untidy in any way. Am I also right in thinking this is a full traditional auto gearbox rather than a paddle-shift manual. Gear changes look seamless, certainly not the bang..bang.. bang changes you would expect for somebody going that quick.

supercommuter

2,169 posts

123 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
I mean, I appreciate that its a fairly good benchmark for these cars. But unless they are all driven by the same driver it kid of takes away from if the GTR is ACTUALLY faster or slower.

The driver is a huge variable!

You then have weather / tyres etc

Shmee

7,565 posts

234 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
supercommuter said:
I mean, I appreciate that its a fairly good benchmark for these cars. But unless they are all driven by the same driver it kid of takes away from if the GTR is ACTUALLY faster or slower.

The driver is a huge variable!

You then have weather / tyres etc
This drive was by Christian Gebhardt for Sport Auto, he does all their drives so it's the same driver in every car, that's why it's relevant he got it around quicker than he could in the 918 Spyder.

supercommuter

2,169 posts

123 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Shmee said:
supercommuter said:
I mean, I appreciate that its a fairly good benchmark for these cars. But unless they are all driven by the same driver it kid of takes away from if the GTR is ACTUALLY faster or slower.

The driver is a huge variable!

You then have weather / tyres etc
This drive was by Christian Gebhardt for Sport Auto, he does all their drives so it's the same driver in every car, that's why it's relevant he got it around quicker than he could in the 918 Spyder.
I appreciate that. My comment was more aimed at the GTR time which was set by Michael Krumm. The other top 10 postings are from a variety of different drivers. I am sure we can agree that it is a somewhat massive variable between cars.

thegreenhell

21,328 posts

240 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Shmee said:
supercommuter said:
I mean, I appreciate that its a fairly good benchmark for these cars. But unless they are all driven by the same driver it kid of takes away from if the GTR is ACTUALLY faster or slower.

The driver is a huge variable!

You then have weather / tyres etc
This drive was by Christian Gebhardt for Sport Auto, he does all their drives so it's the same driver in every car, that's why it's relevant he got it around quicker than he could in the 918 Spyder.
Christian only recently took on the Supertest driving duties. The vast majority of the recorded Sport Auto laps, including that of the 918, were driven by Horst von Saurma.

Shmee

7,565 posts

234 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Christian only recently took on the Supertest driving duties. The vast majority of the recorded Sport Auto laps, including that of the 918, were driven by Horst von Saurma.
Correct. Would be great if they can put him into the 918, Nismo GT-R and Aventador SV for comparison!

Shazbat

170 posts

158 months

Friday 9th December 2016
quotequote all
Yipper said:
It is a good lap.

The Nissan GT-R Nismo is 2 seconds faster round the Nurb and almost half the price of an AMG GT R.
My mates skateboard with a Hayabusa lump strapped to it is 5 seconds faster again and cost 38 pence.