Unusual Omega
Author
Discussion

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Hi Folks,

Just acquired a Seamaster which has had the dial replaced and wondered what everyone thought of it? I'm quite taken with it regardless of the fact that it's "Non-Original"

Enjoy! smile



ETA: It's one of these really wink

Edited by TeamD on Wednesday 14th December 11:26

RichB

56,398 posts

314 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Dare I say it's interesting, particularly the unusual use of IIII to represent 4.

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
RichB said:
Dare I say it's interesting, particularly the unusual use of IIII to represent 4.
I thought that too! smile However, this is the guts of it...



Nollub

108 posts

260 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I don't think it is unusual to see four I's to denote four. Clocks that have Roman numerals usually have four I's to balance the face:

Four numbers with I
Four numbers with V
Four numbers with X

scott-1vt9j

52 posts

130 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Nollub said:
I don't think it is unusual to see four I's to denote four. Clocks that have Roman numerals usually have four I's to balance the face:

Four numbers with I
Four numbers with V
Four numbers with X
I thought it was to balance IIII with VIII on the opposite side. I still don't like when they do it though

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
scott-1vt9j said:
I thought it was to balance IIII with VIII on the opposite side. I still don't like when they do it though
On the whole I can't say it bothers me that much, just find the red face interesting is all.

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Like this? smile



Edited by TeamD on Wednesday 14th December 13:05

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
NeMiSiS said:
Sorry, don't like it, it looks fluffy and out of focus, yet it is focused.
So your suggestion would be to get it re-faced? Shame really, I like the colour. smile

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all


More to your liking NeMeSiS? biggrin

michael gould

5,698 posts

271 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
I would lengthen the sleeve length to your jackets if i was you !!

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
michael gould said:
I would lengthen the sleeve length to your jackets if i was you !!
Is that another vote against the red face? smile

RichB

56,398 posts

314 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
Must say the bulky and heavy handed way the numerals have been applied seems totally at odds with the fine script elsewhere on the Omega face.

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Wednesday 14th December 2016
quotequote all
NeMiSiS said:
I believe dress sence is closely linked to a persons taste in watches and to pick on Michael again he is a Chino and deck pumps guy, with a pastel shade of shirt finished off with a thick knit jumper tied around his neck - this look = Patek Philippe calatrava every time.
Oh!

Brads67

3,199 posts

128 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Horrific.

Have it repaired and triple it`s value.

drainbrain

5,637 posts

141 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
Horrific.

Have it repaired and triple it`s value.
+1

The 'numerals' seem to be made from icing sugar.

It's a flippin' monstrosity and needs immediately returned to its (rather nice) original appearance.

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Accepted chaps getmecoat

Brads67

3,199 posts

128 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Sorry to have been so blunt Dude, but it had to be said.

They are a beautiful watch in original condition and I`m sure if you restore it you`ll agree.

TeamD

Original Poster:

5,060 posts

262 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
Brads67 said:
Sorry to have been so blunt Dude, but it had to be said.

They are a beautiful watch in original condition and I`m sure if you restore it you`ll agree.
OK, now to find a replacement face, anyone have any suggestions as to where to source one? smile

drainbrain

5,637 posts

141 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
TeamD said:
OK, now to find a replacement face, anyone have any suggestions as to where to source one? smile
Ebay or Omega themselves (expensive).

I think Omega have stopped supplying parts to outsourced specialists.

Sometimes Chrono24 or TZUK can turn up a hard to find part too. But a vintage part is often (much) harder to find for obvious reasons.

Some good info here: http://www.ofrei.com/page_146.html


Edited by drainbrain on Thursday 15th December 13:41

darker grapefruit

376 posts

130 months

Thursday 15th December 2016
quotequote all
If you buy a used dial you will need to check carefully that it will fit, including the position of the 2 'feet' which are soldered on to the back. Why don't you just get the existing dial stripped back to the metal and done properly? Companies like C & F Dial Restoration (not a recommendation, just an example) have the correct printing plates for a lot of vintage Omegas according to their website.

Edited to add: those Roman numerals look like they were done by Mary Berry after a few sherries - did you happen to purchase the watch from an ebay seller in India?

Edited by darker grapefruit on Thursday 15th December 13:52