Nuke map - frightening how much instant damage
Nuke map - frightening how much instant damage
Author
Discussion

Badvok

Original Poster:

1,867 posts

197 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Pick your location, select your bomb and see how big the blast radius is - scary frown

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

trickywoo

14,237 posts

260 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
It was either the uk or us who had the Moscow criterion when first developing nuclear weapons and it was for a single device to be able to destroy Moscow.

The game has moved on but during the Cold War there were b52s permanently in the air each carrying 4 50 mega ton stand off nuclear weapons. Quite potent.

mp3manager

4,254 posts

226 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Shall we play a game?

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

283 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Charming app for Christmas - although I did try it wink

Wobbegong

15,078 posts

199 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
The Abbott bomb (500mt yield) isn't listed frown

Butter Face

35,052 posts

190 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Strangely I always expect Nukes to make bigger bangs than that shows they would!

ApOrbital

10,592 posts

148 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
That link is as old as nurty smile

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

291 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
trickywoo said:
It was either the uk or us who had the Moscow criterion when first developing nuclear weapons and it was for a single device to be able to destroy Moscow.

The game has moved on but during the Cold War there were b52s permanently in the air each carrying 4 50 mega ton stand off nuclear weapons. Quite potent.
50 megatons? Are you sure?

Desiato

960 posts

313 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
trickywoo said:
It was either the uk or us who had the Moscow criterion when first developing nuclear weapons and it was for a single device to be able to destroy Moscow.

The game has moved on but during the Cold War there were b52s permanently in the air each carrying 4 50 mega ton stand off nuclear weapons. Quite potent.
50 megatons? Are you sure?
Indeed the B41 is the largest bomb developed at the time and was 25 megaton yield, it was also the only three stage thermonuclear weapon carried.

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
I would quite like to have watched from a distance when the Tsar Bomba was set off.

57 Megatons with a theoretical yield of 100 Megatons.

The largest man made explosion in history.

stevesingo

5,047 posts

252 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
I saw the title and thought of this...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

Halb

53,012 posts

213 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
mp3manager said:
Shall we play a game?
noughts and crosses?

Halmyre

12,638 posts

169 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
NinjaPower said:
I would quite like to have watched from a distance when the Tsar Bomba was set off.

57 Megatons with a theoretical yield of 100 Megatons.

The largest man made explosion in history.
I don't think there WAS a safe directly observable distance for Tsar Bomba, unless you were on the moon.

mickk

30,508 posts

272 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
mp3manager said:
Shall we play a game?
noughts and crosses?
Global Thermonuclear War?

Vitorio

4,296 posts

173 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
I don't think there WAS a safe directly observable distance for Tsar Bomba, unless you were on the moon.
Pretty much, they had to scale the fker back to 50 mt so the drop-plane stood a chance of escape, despite there being a HUGE chute on the bomb

The shockwave was still detectable after travelling around the world three times

CubanPete

3,817 posts

218 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
My OH worked at a gas processing plant for a while. She was being interviewed as her contract was coming to an end (maternity cover) and an international telecoms company. When asked what the best thing she had learnt, she talked about the health and safety (she is an accountant) the guy interviewing her was a bit dismissive, and not quite, but nearly laughing at some of the things she had learnt. He then asked what the worst that could happen was... An explosion would take out about an 8 mile radius - at which point he suddnely became a lot more attentive!

(He turned out to be a bullying cock, so she moved on, he had over 100% staff turnover from a team of 8 in just three months!)

anonymous-user

84 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
trickywoo said:
It was either the uk or us who had the Moscow criterion when first developing nuclear weapons and it was for a single device to be able to destroy Moscow.

The game has moved on but during the Cold War there were b52s permanently in the air each carrying 4 50 mega ton stand off nuclear weapons. Quite potent.
I thought they were just kept at a heightened state of readiness but that's properly bonkers!

stitched

3,813 posts

203 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Halb said:
mp3manager said:
Shall we play a game?
noughts and crosses?
Thought it was tic tac toe on that side of the atlantic.

Gecko1978

12,302 posts

187 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Loved war games movie as a kid the simulation at the end of all the possible attack options an basically the world ends every way very quickly. Great film.

CAPP0

20,881 posts

233 months

Saturday 17th December 2016
quotequote all
Happy little website, that!