Oil Tanker Bow Shape
Author
Discussion

Sam99

Original Poster:

297 posts

202 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
Hello

I work at an Oil Terminal in the Arabian Gulf.
I deal with the Oil Cargo Loading and Certification.

We get a lot of older tankers in with the bow nose visible when the tankers are empty. When loaded the nose is not visible.
Recently we have had a few new tankers on their maiden voyage with no bow nose and an almost vertical bow. It may even be a reclined bow by a few degrees.

Can anyone explain the new bow profile and lack of nose??


Thanks

Sam99

Original Poster:

297 posts

202 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all


Sorry , yes .

Trevatanus

11,349 posts

179 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
Just saw this and this sprang to mind:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-QNAwUdHUQ

King Herald

23,501 posts

245 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
This is a new type that seems to be all the rage in smaller vessels, the X Bow.


ecsrobin

18,642 posts

194 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
King Herald said:
This is a new type that seems to be all the rage in smaller vessels, the X Bow.

They look great like that. Here's the benefits: http://www.marineinsight.com/future-shipping/featu...

And the award for the ugliest ship:


AMD87

2,004 posts

231 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
And the award for the ugliest ship:

eek

wolfracesonic

9,177 posts

156 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
Sorry for bumping my own post but............. The definitive PH bulbous bow thread HTH

ecsrobin

18,642 posts

194 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
AMD87 said:
ecsrobin said:
And the award for the ugliest ship:

eek
Now patched....



Although it's now in the yard getting a decent repair.

Unbusy

934 posts

126 months

Wednesday 21st December 2016
quotequote all
That must have hurt. Did they lend it to the Royal Navy for the day?

Taffer

2,343 posts

226 months

Sunday 25th December 2016
quotequote all


The bow of AIDA Prima and her sister Perla were designed without a bulbous bow, as it was reckoned that, with the design speed/routes of the ship, she wouldn't benefit from having one. 'Challenging' paintwork aside, I quite like the bow shape; very reminiscent of ships of the 'Dreadnought'-era!

Edited by Taffer on Sunday 25th December 03:20

Otispunkmeyer

13,758 posts

184 months

Sunday 25th December 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
King Herald said:
This is a new type that seems to be all the rage in smaller vessels, the X Bow.

They look great like that. Here's the benefits: http://www.marineinsight.com/future-shipping/featu...

And the award for the ugliest ship:

I like that. It's got feel of Thunderbirds about it.

hidetheelephants

35,695 posts

222 months

Sunday 25th December 2016
quotequote all
ecsrobin said:
And the award for the ugliest ship:

That's about aerodynamics rather than bow wave control; car carriers are like blocks of flats so reducing drag can save a lot of fuel.

Ms R.Saucy

284 posts

119 months

Sunday 25th December 2016
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
That's about aerodynamics rather than bow wave control; car carriers are like blocks of flats so reducing drag can save a lot of fuel.
my comment was I presume that's a VLCC / plant carrier .