996 turbo s mx05 aky
996 turbo s mx05 aky
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
bca are auctioning one later this month with 71k miles and what looks to be reasonable MOT and service history... what do we think its worth?

yajeed

5,057 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
RC1 said:
bca are auctioning one later this month with 71k miles and what looks to be reasonable MOT and service history... what do we think its worth?
40k in a private sale I'd guess?

monthefish

20,467 posts

260 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
yajeed said:
RC1 said:
bca are auctioning one later this month with 71k miles and what looks to be reasonable MOT and service history... what do we think its worth?
40k in a private sale I'd guess?
How have you arrived at that figure?

The cheapest (non-S) turbos of that age are around the £40k mark.
JZM (admittedly top-end dealer pricing) have 2 turbo S - one at £85k and one at £78k (now reserved).


yajeed

5,057 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
monthefish said:
How have you arrived at that figure?

The cheapest (non-S) turbos of that age are around the £40k mark.
JZM (admittedly top-end dealer pricing) have 2 turbo S - one at £85k and one at £78k (now reserved).
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance.

Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.

This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...


Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37

pete

1,634 posts

313 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
I suspect that places like JZM or 911 Virgin would ask around the £60k mark (or more) in this climate for a 70k mile 996 Turbo S, especially if it was a manual coupe.

stubbsy996

785 posts

242 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
yajeed said:
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance.

Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.

This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...


Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37
90k miles and 9 previous owners. Dealer based in Keighley - read reviews and beware.

Carlson W6

860 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
Would have been 21K in 2014

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
Carlson W6 said:
Would have been 21K in 2014
i know. a few years back i was saying like most of us what a relative bargain the x50's etc seemed at the time.

Carlson W6

860 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
Apologies- Missed the "S" part-

27/28K in 2014

monthefish

20,467 posts

260 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
Carlson W6 said:
Would have been 21K in 2014
A turbo S has never been 21k.

996TT02

3,342 posts

169 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
yajeed said:
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance.

Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.

This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...


Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37
It's not a Turbo S but as usual is misleadingly advertised as a Turbo Tiptronic S (the tip is "s" whatever that means..)

yajeed

5,057 posts

283 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
stubbsy996 said:
90k miles and 9 previous owners. Dealer based in Keighley - read reviews and beware.
I think I did try to identify the dealer. However, as I said before, when at auction, how would you know?

Carlson W6

860 posts

153 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
monthefish said:
A turbo S has never been 21k.
Did you miss my next post? :-)

g7jhp

7,033 posts

267 months

Tuesday 7th February 2017
quotequote all
I'd imagine JZM would have a 70k manual 996 turbo S for circa £65k.

Limited number, X50 pack and ceramic brakes.

monthefish

20,467 posts

260 months

Wednesday 8th February 2017
quotequote all
Carlson W6 said:
monthefish said:
A turbo S has never been 21k.
Did you miss my next post? :-)
Yes.

Even still, I don't recall a straight S ever being that low. In 2014, they were only ten years old.

My recollection is that the bottom of the market for a straight non-s turbo was just under 20k, but that was for the earliest cars (2000) with mega miles and/or patchy histories and/or tip gearboxes and/or savannah interiors.


pete

1,634 posts

313 months

Wednesday 8th February 2017
quotequote all
To give you an idea, I paid £35k for a 55k mile 996 Turbo S from a dealer back in July 2012. That was a September 2005 car, one of the last handful off the production line according to the chassis number, so as new as it's possible for a 996 to be. They never really got cheaper than that, although mine wasn't the cheapest on the market (there were a few private sales in the low 30s when I bought). Within a year or so they were starting to creep up, obviously they've gone a bit bonkers since.