Higher Interest no fee vs lower interest hight fee
Higher Interest no fee vs lower interest hight fee
Author
Discussion

Jordan210

Original Poster:

5,210 posts

213 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
I have massively confused myself looking at mortgage and need some help. (can tell its been a long day can't even spell high)

For example on a 2 year fixed deal.

Is it better to pay a high upfront cost with a lower interest rate or a higher interest rate with no fee.

Should I be looking at the total payment including product fee or just interest rates ?

Edited by Jordan210 on Monday 6th March 21:49

Scawie

331 posts

238 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Moneysaving Expert's comparison tool gives you the average cost per year over the fix period with any fees and cashback taken into consideration. Gives you a pretty straight comparison.

Jordan210

Original Poster:

5,210 posts

213 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Scawie said:
Moneysaving Expert's comparison tool gives you the average cost per year over the fix period with any fees and cashback taken into consideration. Gives you a pretty straight comparison.
Thats what iv been looking at. But now not sure whats better.

As to me it seams like swings and roundabouts. But I could be missing the point

Sarnie

8,373 posts

239 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Jordan210 said:
Thats what iv been looking at. But now not sure whats better.

As to me it seams like swings and roundabouts. But I could be missing the point
The higher the balance the more likely that a product with the lowest possible rate with a fee will work out cheaper.

A low balance (under £100k for example) will out yield that having a higher rate and low/no fees work out cheaper.

There is a natural tipping point. Add up all fees plus x24 monthly payments......the total will tell you which is cheapest.

But naturally, these are not the only considerations when choosing a product..........

Jordan210

Original Poster:

5,210 posts

213 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Sarnie said:
The higher the balance the more likely that a product with the lowest possible rate with a fee will work out cheaper.

A low balance (under £100k for example) will out yield that having a higher rate and low/no fees work out cheaper.

There is a natural tipping point. Add up all fees plus x24 monthly payments......the total will tell you which is cheapest.

But naturally, these are not the only considerations when choosing a product..........
Will call you tomorrow ! my heads spinning with numbers wobble

frisbee

5,613 posts

140 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
There was a threshold for the higher fee, lower interest mortgages when I was looking e.g. over £200k mortgage.

Scawie

331 posts

238 months

Monday 6th March 2017
quotequote all
Jordan210 said:
Thats what iv been looking at. But now not sure whats better.

As to me it seams like swings and roundabouts. But I could be missing the point
The total cost assessment gives you a pretty decent straight comparison. You can click the popup to see how it's calculated.

TartanPaint

3,367 posts

169 months

Tuesday 7th March 2017
quotequote all
Here's a good spreadsheet for comparing outcomes on two mortgages side by side.

http://www.locostfireblade.co.uk/spreadsheet/Index...

I found it through google, but from the website it looks like the creator is a bit of a petrolhead too, so might even be on here?

shep1001

4,620 posts

219 months

Friday 10th March 2017
quotequote all
There are people on here who are more qualified than me to answer but I have just done my mortgage. On the amount I borrowed for the fixed period I did, I was better off taking the higher interest rate with no fee. It was easy to work out. I guess this will vary based on individual circumstances. If you are using a broker, they should help you with this?