Amber lights
Author
Discussion

Dr Jekyll

Original Poster:

23,820 posts

291 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
Suppose you stop at an amber traffic light and are promptly rammed from behind. Could the tailgater hold you partially responsible on the grounds that it's OK to go through amber if stopping might cause an accident?

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,034 posts

265 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
No

CubanPete

3,809 posts

218 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
If you stopped on a green light it would be the following cars fault if there was a collision.

Hackney

7,437 posts

238 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
Assuming you had time to stop before they hit you it'd be the other driver's fault.
If you did an emergency stop - without checking behind you - then you may be slightly culpable.

Whenever I've run an amber it's because I've seen a car behind me who is going too fast or has gambled on me going through and is therefore in no position to stop without ramming me.

4040vision

255 posts

116 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
The amber will be lit for 3 seconds before it turns red. That's more than 40m at 30mph. Why can't you arrange to stop?

Boosted LS1

21,200 posts

290 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
As far as I'm aware the amber means stop, just like the red. Only the green means go but having said that I and probably most on here will go through the amber rather then stop and wait etc.

BertBert

21,291 posts

241 months

Sunday 12th March 2017
quotequote all
We know this surely. Amber means stop. Nearly like red. There is a stat defence for running an amber regarding the safety (or otherwise) of stopping.

However, what I see is not what I was taught all those years ago. I was taught that when coming to lights you lifted, nay slowed so you could stop if they changed to amber. These days it seems to be just go for it and when you get an amber, provided you don't go past the red too long after it has appeared, you will be ok.

Bert

Dr Jekyll

Original Poster:

23,820 posts

291 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
4040vision said:
The amber will be lit for 3 seconds before it turns red. That's more than 40m at 30mph. Why can't you arrange to stop?
I might not be 40 metres away when it turns amber though, I might be 1 metre away.

Vipers

33,514 posts

258 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
BertBert said:
We know this surely. Amber means stop. Nearly like red. There is a stat defence for running an amber regarding the safety (or otherwise) of stopping.

However, what I see is not what I was taught all those years ago. I was taught that when coming to lights you lifted, nay slowed so you could stop if they changed to amber. These days it seems to be just go for it and when you get an amber, provided you don't go past the red too long after it has appeared, you will be ok.

Bert
Agree, suppose approaching a set of lights in a 40, no point in bowling right up to the lights at 40 because you probably won't stop in time.

Chester draws

1,412 posts

140 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
It's nigh on impossible to realistically avoid ever going through a light while it's on amber.

As your distance from the line approaches zero, the speed you need to be going at in order to stop if it instantly changes to amber also will approach zero.

On a fast road where lights may well stay green for a minute, should we really slow to sub 10mph as we get to 5m from the line, just in case they change?

What about when we are 1 metre from the line with the lights still green? What speed should we now be doing?

supermono

7,464 posts

278 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
I think at the dawn of traffic lights all sets were amber at the same time to help traffic flow whereas now everywhere's red sometimes for a few seconds before the opposite side gets a turn.

My own opinion is too many folks in traffic planning wishing to punish drivers and cause delays to justify various more draconian anti car measures.

The result of this in London at least is everyone takes every last millisecond of amber and perhaps even red, knowing that there's no way anyone's likely to be on even amber before you're safely across the junction.

I guess the highway code isn't changed though so stopping at amber is correct and as always crashing into the back of someone is your own fault.

esxste

4,292 posts

136 months

Monday 13th March 2017
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Could the tailgater hold you partially responsible on the grounds that it's OK to go through amber if stopping might cause an accident?
No because we're all expected to be able to stop without hitting the car in front.