My theory about Michael Jackson
Discussion
I've got a new theory. I watched "Hook" at the weekend with my kids and noticed a definite parallel.
Specifically, Captain Hook kidnapped half of a fmily in Neverland. Isn't Jackson accused of kidnapping half a family in Neverland? Also, Hook endeared himself to the boy (about 13) saying that "he's now the Daddy" - sound familiar?
As such, although MJ considers himself to be Peter Pan, I reckon he is, in fact, Captain Hook.
Specifically, Captain Hook kidnapped half of a fmily in Neverland. Isn't Jackson accused of kidnapping half a family in Neverland? Also, Hook endeared himself to the boy (about 13) saying that "he's now the Daddy" - sound familiar?
As such, although MJ considers himself to be Peter Pan, I reckon he is, in fact, Captain Hook.
DeltaFox said:
And another thing about Michael Jackass....
How can he father two WHITE kids when he's genetically black?
Whats the chances of this occurring?
Why hasnt anyone else noticed this?
I'd noticd this. And it gets worse - on the Bashir documentary MJ claims that the mothers are both black as well. This, on top of the fact that he's not had plastic surgery, leads me to the conclusion that he's a compulsive liar.
ehh, other people have but prob dont breach the subject because its racist. I think they did cosmetic surgery on his sperm so they make white kids. But seriously i had this conersation a few days ago, the kids hae blonde hair and look very nordic. They are not his children, best thing that can happen is he is sent down and these children get a chance in life.
r Cha'mone!
gooby said:
Did hook get them drunk, show them p0rn and then have a fiddle? I am led to believe he really isnt that nice.
did MJ,
you have proof of this? my god man what are you doing there you should be on a plan and out in america could make a fortune selling your story proving for once and for all the truth.
or is it all assumption based on what you have read that has been written by people based on what they have heard, from people who might have been told something that was true or something that was made up.????
is it any wonder that he paid off the first character to attempt to make a fast buck?
and no i am not a fan of MJ, nor do i think he is innocent entirely, but until things are proven i do not believe anyone can say that he is guilty.
other wise we could all be on the wrong side of the law just because of something someone believed.
DeltaFox said:
And another thing about Michael Jackass....
How can he father two WHITE kids when he's genetically black?
Whats the chances of this occurring?
Why hasnt anyone else noticed this?
The chances of TWO are very low, but not that low for one. The gene for dark skin is stronger but not to the point of exclusion.
I see him more as a victim of this whole affair - he's being crucified by money hunting leeches. OK, the guy is obviously a bit screwed up, but until they produce some real evidence that isn't contradictory, I don't feel that he deserves this public pillorying.
So Hook? Nah, more like hooked IMO.
So Hook? Nah, more like hooked IMO.
I also don't really buy into MJ being guilty. Though I'm open to looking at solid evidence, I just haven't seen it yet, and it seems to me that the public just wants to punish him for being different. As a society, we cannot criminalize a lifestyle. Sure, Jackson likes little kids, but who are we to say that it's any different from someone who likes dogs. Does every person who considers himself a "dog lover" get it on with their canine friends in their spare time? If not, then it is irresponsible to assume that Jackson is guilty just because he has an interest in young children.
And to bring up another point: would there be the same uproar is Jackson were female?
And to bring up another point: would there be the same uproar is Jackson were female?
groucho said:
And another thing about Michael Jackass....
How can he father two WHITE kids when he's genetically black?
Whats the chances of this occurring?
Why hasnt anyone else noticed this?
Never thought of that, bloody good point.
No need to be rude about his nose......
imperialism2024 said:
I also don't really buy into MJ being guilty. Though I'm open to looking at solid evidence, I just haven't seen it yet, and it seems to me that the public just wants to punish him for being different. As a society, we cannot criminalize a lifestyle. Sure, Jackson likes little kids, but who are we to say that it's any different from someone who likes dogs. Does every person who considers himself a "dog lover" get it on with their canine friends in their spare time? If not, then it is irresponsible to assume that Jackson is guilty just because he has an interest in young children.
And to bring up another point: would there be the same uproar is Jackson were female?
Well firstly, if he were a woman there'd be more uproar because that would be very rare. Think about Moira Hindley, etc.
Secondly, wasn't there some forensic evidence linking one of the kids to some of his (grooming) porn?
Anyway, time will tell.
stackmonkey said:
DeltaFox said:
And another thing about Michael Jackass....
How can he father two WHITE kids when he's genetically black?
Whats the chances of this occurring?
Why hasnt anyone else noticed this?
The chances of TWO are very low, but not that low for one. The gene for dark skin is stronger but not to the point of exclusion.
you are joking? the chances of a black and a white person having a child with aryan features, pale white skin and blonde hair are exactly 0
>> Edited by Hardcore2000 on Tuesday 29th March 21:10
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff