RE: Government to spend money on roads
RE: Government to spend money on roads
Tuesday 29th March 2005

Government to spend money on roads

Including traffic controls and car pool lanes


Motorway junction
Motorway junction
The government is to spend money on road improvements -- but there's a potential sting in the tail.

Transport Secretary Alistair Darling has announced a £1.38 billion package of schemes "to improve safety and reduce congestion on key sections of the motorway network in Yorkshire, Hampshire and Essex."

Buried in the details of the scenes (highlights below), Darling also invited the Highways Agency, which manages the work, "to consider physical Integral Demand Management (IDM) measures that would seek to safeguard the benefits of these improvements by introducing such interventions as Access Control and High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes. These are currently being considered by the Highways Agency as part of a national programme to develop guidance on implementation of IDM."

In other words, the agency will need consider whether to implement traffic light access control to the motorways, and whether to add a car pool lane.

Scheme highlights:

  • £1.29 billion for the M1 (Chesterfield to Leeds) and M62 (Huddersfield to Leeds) to widen to dual four lanes
  • £78 million to widen the M27 in both directions between junctions 3 and 4 near Southampton and to introduce climbing lanes between Junctions 11 and 12, near Portsmouth
  • £8 million to reduce congestion on M25 J28, the junction with the A12, (Brook Street interchange, near Brentwood, Essex), by improving access to the slip road to the A12 north east.

Alistair Darling said, "The Government is committed to improving the strategic road network and to providing extra capacity where it is needed. The M1 and M62 are two of Britain's most important routes and these schemes will support regeneration across the North of England, improve the reliability of journey times and ease congestion for road users.

"Widening the M27 motorway between Junctions 3 and 4 where the M3 and M27 merge north of Southampton will add vital extra capacity. The climbing lane scheme at Portsdown Hill will involve the addition of a lane eastbound from Junction 11 and westbound from Junction 12.

"The M27 is an important South Coast route and about 110,000 vehicles use these stretches daily. These improvements will bring reduced congestion, quicker and more reliable journeys, and improved safety.

"Both schemes will be built within existing highway limits minimising the impact on the environment and surrounding communities, and will bring real benefits to traffic.

"The funding announced today for the M25 Junction 28 is a very important scheme for local and long distance drivers. It will complement the M25 widening programme, announced in April 2004, and is due to be completed by 2014. The improvement will increase junction capacity for local and long distance drivers and reduce congestion, one of our big commitments to drivers.

Image courtesy www.speedcam.co.uk

Author
Discussion

squirrelz

Original Poster:

1,186 posts

293 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Article said:
£1.29 billion for the M1 (Chesterfield to Leeds) and M62 (Huddersfield to Leeds) to widen to dual four lanes

What the hell are they going to do at the Tinsley Viaduct?

annodomini2

6,962 posts

273 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Well they've already taken it down from 3 to 2. So unless they plan on hanging the other 4 lanes off the conning towers!

corcoran

675 posts

296 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
thats a motorway junction? must be the m42 -- so quiet....

flamingm0

68 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Meanwhile we have Arundel and Worthing further along on this "important South Coast route" that are single carriageway and always clagged. Consultation after consulatation but no bypass. New roads or even decent maintenance of the ones we have? Some chance. Always seems to be money for painting silly stripes on the road and generally ruining road efficiency. How about re-investing a least some of what they reap from the motorist to make roads BETTER? Ok, rant over.

manek

2,978 posts

306 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
corcoran said:
thats a motorway junction? must be the m42 -- so quiet....


M5 actually

Only pic I had to hand -- need to get out more...

Manek
PH Editor

>> Edited by manek on Tuesday 29th March 17:41

Pies

13,116 posts

278 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Its not exactly alot of money,when you consider how much tax they will collect over thr 10 years

jas16

378 posts

254 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
well, if Britain sucks up to America so much then why dont they follow them when talking about motorists. In America, all the revenue raised via taxes etc, are used FOR the motorist, ie on better quality roads etc. But here in the UK, less than a fifth of what is raised is only used. Honestly, what a load of shit!

mikeatBB

35 posts

256 months

Wednesday 30th March 2005
quotequote all
If Dear Darling used his surveillance cameras on the current M.way traffic he would find the ratio of single to multiple occupancy and I reckon it would show a lane would be nearly empty as they are in California but brilliantly fast and relaxing if your on tour with the missus!...........Mike

anonymous-user

76 months

Wednesday 30th March 2005
quotequote all
By shares in blow up doll manufacturers now! One of those sat in the passanger seat and you're well away.

As for the rest of it, it's just Labour doing what they've become past masters at. Produce a bill that's sweet and sour - point out that without swalling the sour you don't get to enjoy the sweet so nobody votes against it and they get more of their insidious ideas set in statute. (The biggest example of this being the University top up fees - stick it in a bill with bringing back grants and tell MPs vote for the whole bill or none of it - but it'll be your fault that all those poor students won't be getting grants)

squirrelz

Original Poster:

1,186 posts

293 months

Thursday 31st March 2005
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
Well they've already taken it down from 3 to 2. So unless they plan on hanging the other 4 lanes off the conning towers!
I think you mean cooling towers - conning towers are what submarines have