New speeding fines related to income
New speeding fines related to income
Author
Discussion

robinessex

Original Poster:

12,020 posts

211 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
New speeding laws - Brits OUTRAGED at new £2,500 fines coming in THIS MONTH

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/788677/sp...

NEW speeding laws will be introduced in the UK on April 24th 2017, seeing fines significantly increase and punishing certain drivers more than others.
Drivers will be charged up to 175 per cent of their wage for breaking the speed limit
Under strict new laws, drivers can now be charged up to 175 per cent of their weekly wage depending on how severe the offence is.
This means that wealthier drivers will be punished more severely, which almost half (46 per cent) of Brits believes is unfair.
The maximum fine for getting caught speeding is also increasing from £1,000 to £2,500 in a further bid to deter drivers from breaking the speed limit.

Well, that will definately cut the accident rate, wont't it ?

mmm-five

12,385 posts

314 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Isn't it means tested already - and different courts give out different fines for identical offences?

So even the worst 'category c' offence, which can get you fine of 175% of your weekly wage, would be the same for someone £100k+ a year as for someone on £100k a week - as the max is a £2.5k fine.

Looks like I'll never have to worry about hitting the max fine tongue out

kambites

71,556 posts

251 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
If you view the fine as a deterrence, it makes sense to me. For some people, a £100 fine is significant, for many it's trivial to the point of irrelevance.

Edited by kambites on Thursday 6th April 14:24

SS2.

14,712 posts

268 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Another one of those articles that gets it wrong.

R Tickle said:
The maximum fine for getting caught speeding is also increasing from £1,000 to £2,500 in a further bid to deter drivers from breaking the speed limit.
It isn't.

Maximum fine for speeding on a motorway stays at £2,500. Maximum fine on all other roads stays at £1,000.

Other than a couple of newly included 'comments' for the Magistrates to consider, it's the guideline income multiplier that's changing, and only for the highest category of speed,

MrBarry123

6,108 posts

151 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
SS2. said:
Other than a couple of newly included 'comments' for the Magistrates to consider, it's the guideline income multiplier that's changing, and only for the highest category of speed,
That's how I read it too.

Poor reporting, as expected I suppose though.

Lots of people reading this news will now assume if they're caught at 35mph in a 30mph zone, they'll have to pay 175% of their weekly income as a fine, instead of the £100 they'll actually have to pay.

Sump

5,512 posts

197 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Fake news. We really need to hold newspapers accountable for just bullst.

SuperchargedVR6

3,138 posts

250 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
robinessex said:
Brits OUTRAGED
What doesn't outrage a Brit?

We're lucky to have gotten away with means tested fines for as long as we have.

Jesus

16,105 posts

219 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
SuperchargedVR6 said:
What doesn't outrage a Brit?

We're lucky to have gotten away with means tested fines for as long as we have.
I think someone needs to set up a Facebook page to show how REALLY outraged we are.

SuperchargedVR6

3,138 posts

250 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Jesus said:
SuperchargedVR6 said:
What doesn't outrage a Brit?

We're lucky to have gotten away with means tested fines for as long as we have.
I think someone needs to set up a Facebook page to show how REALLY outraged we are.
"OUTRAGED Brits turn to Social Media to show their DISGUST at the new proposed fines. Mr Needham from Surrey commented: 'I am absolutely APPALLED by this move, it truly is OUTRAGEOUS that I should have to pay more money than usual for doing 179mph on my favourite road. DISGUSTING"


boz1

425 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Better still, why bother pretending that they're really trying to discourage speeding? A fine is just about the worst way to discourage something unless its astronomical, in which case it's disproportionate.

When we decided to properly try and stamp out drink driving, it wasn't the fines that helped; while there was some impact from the other punishments, by far the most effective measure was simply making it socially unacceptable.

Speeding is not socially unacceptable and never will be because, deep down, a good proportion of people have the sense to realise it often isn't dangerous.

So what they're actually trying to do is maximise revenue, in which case they should do it properly! I say, make all speeding fines proportional to the road, limit and the time of day (i.e. the danger), so motorway speed up to, say 100mph outside of rush hour would be a fine of £5, capped at £10 of offences per week. I reckon about 2/3 of people would choose to pay the "fee" for the "right" to speed on long motorway journeys. I know I would.

It's a highly efficient and non-distortive way of raising revenue too compared to say, income tax. (What I propose is, in effect, a tax.)


Toaster

2,940 posts

223 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
robinessex said:

This means that wealthier drivers will be punished more severely, which almost half (46 per cent) of Brits believes is unfair.
Ok so when thinking about this % where did they get that number from? 48% of people who voted in the great referendum wanted to stay in Europe. So if the 54% of of people in this arbitrary quoted % means the 'Will' of the people shall prevail and therefore it has to be carried out.


Mutters quietly to himself and walks off.........bloody brexit and other % stats con.....

HantsRat

2,409 posts

138 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
boz1 said:
by far the most effective measure was simply making it socially unacceptable.
Actually I have to disagree, I would say the biggest deterrent for drink drive is a minimum 12month ban and fine.

yajeed

5,057 posts

284 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
It's just a cash making exercise.

I don't like the 100 quid or whatever it costs when you get caught speeding. However, I'd pay multiples of that to avoid the points.

The prospect of losing my license through totting up is the big deterrent to speeding, not the cash.


surveyor

18,698 posts

214 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
Sump said:
Fake news. We really need to hold newspapers accountable for just bullst.
This Fake News stuff really pisses me off.

It's not fake - it's actually true. It is however reported in a misleading way - or misreported if you like...

boz1

425 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
HantsRat said:
Actually I have to disagree, I would say the biggest deterrent for drink drive is a minimum 12month ban and fine.
Perhaps for scumbags. But not for those capable of understanding the stupidity of drink driving and the devastation of the possible consequences... I hope!

For example, in the rural area I grew up, your chances of seeing the rozzers were miniscule. I do recall one mate who got done, out of the many who I know who each chanced it many times and got away with it. I think the reasons those people don't drink and drive now is because they've grown up and reason like adults. Their chances of being caught haven't changed. In fact the chances are probably lower than ever, thanks to policing cuts...

Sump

5,512 posts

197 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
surveyor said:
Sump said:
Fake news. We really need to hold newspapers accountable for just bullst.
This Fake News stuff really pisses me off.

It's not fake - it's actually true. It is however reported in a misleading way - or misreported if you like...
Most retarded thing I have read today.

Guys, it isn't fake news, just misleading/misreported. Sheer lol right there.

Toltec

7,179 posts

253 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
boz1 said:
So what they're actually trying to do is maximise revenue, in which case they should do it properly! I say, make all speeding fines proportional to the road, limit and the time of day (i.e. the danger), so motorway speed up to, say 100mph outside of rush hour would be a fine of £5, capped at £10 of offences per week. I reckon about 2/3 of people would choose to pay the "fee" for the "right" to speed on long motorway journeys. I know I would.

It's a highly efficient and non-distortive way of raising revenue too compared to say, income tax. (What I propose is, in effect, a tax.)
Could be a scale, £1 per mph over the limit.

Even better they could make it like the congestion charge, it is up to you to decide if you need to pay it and how much, if you choose not to pay or don't pay enough to cover the highest speed you have been detected at you get a big speeding fine. TPTB could get Crapita to run it, what could go wrong?

boyse7en

8,193 posts

195 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
boz1 said:
Perhaps for scumbags. But not for those capable of understanding the stupidity of drink driving and the devastation of the possible consequences... I hope!

For example, in the rural area I grew up, your chances of seeing the rozzers were miniscule. I do recall one mate who got done, out of the many who I know who each chanced it many times and got away with it. I think the reasons those people don't drink and drive now is because they've grown up and reason like adults. Their chances of being caught haven't changed. In fact the chances are probably lower than ever, thanks to policing cuts...
Go outside any rural pub at closing time and you'll see loads of people drink-driving homewards, bouncing off the hedges as they go.
Not low-life scum, these are businessmen, farm workers, professionals... most in their 40s, 50s or 60s...
For some reason they feel that the laws don't apply to them

boz1

425 posts

208 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
boyse7en said:
Go outside any rural pub at closing time and you'll see loads of people drink-driving homewards, bouncing off the hedges as they go.
Not low-life scum, these are businessmen, farm workers, professionals... most in their 40s, 50s or 60s...
For some reason they feel that the laws don't apply to them
Isn't that a bit of an exaggeration? Or isn't the rate at least a lot lower than it used to be and perhaps this behaviour is confined to the "older generation"?

agtlaw

7,409 posts

236 months

Thursday 6th April 2017
quotequote all
robinessex said:
New speeding laws - Brits OUTRAGED at new £2,500 fines coming in THIS MONTH

http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/cars/788677/sp...

NEW speeding laws will be introduced in the UK on April 24th 2017, seeing fines significantly increase and punishing certain drivers more than others.
Drivers will be charged up to 175 per cent of their wage for breaking the speed limit
Under strict new laws, drivers can now be charged up to 175 per cent of their weekly wage depending on how severe the offence is.
This means that wealthier drivers will be punished more severely, which almost half (46 per cent) of Brits believes is unfair.
The maximum fine for getting caught speeding is also increasing from £1,000 to £2,500 in a further bid to deter drivers from breaking the speed limit.

Well, that will definately cut the accident rate, wont't it ?
Reality:

Maximum fine - unchanged

Fixed penalty - unchanged

Speed awareness course threshold - unchanged

What's actually changing:

See previous threads (at least 2 running) - e.g.
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=16...

Edited by agtlaw on Thursday 6th April 22:20