Free the nipple

[Wobbegong]

No, not a seized bleed nipple, so no need for it to be in general gassing

A friend of mine who works as a model (I say work, she travels the world and gets paid by pervs to pose nude for their amateur photography) and had posted her latest pictures to instagram and Facebook. They were taken down due to female nipples on show. She then reposted the pictures with the hashtag 'freethenipple' covering up her nips.

Anyways I had a read into it and I think they have a point. Why is it that men are allowed to expose their nipples in public/magazines/films without issue but if a woman does the same, it is seen as something of an evil sexual nature?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_the_Nipple_(c...

[Venturist]

Because men and women are different

[Piersman2]

Seriously? Never has a thread on PH been more applicable for the 'this thread is useless with pics' icon.

[MiniMan64]

For the record I have no issues with the visibility of female nipples.

[HRL]

Me neither as long as they're outties, not innies.

You know what I mean.

[Mike_Mac]

HRL said:

Me neither as long as they're outties, not innies.

You know what I mean.

Don't bring Brexit into it!!!

[98elise]

Venturist said:

Because men and women are different

What is it about women's nipples that are offensive? Are the unsuitable for children!

It's weird because most of a boob can be on show and it's fine, it's only the nipple that causes a problem.

[Smiler.]

Piersman2 said:

Seriously? Never has a thread on PH been more applicable for the 'this thread is useless with pics' icon.

Agreed, pointless thread.

[chow pan toon]

Someone I know posted a pic of a topless woman saying that she self-identified as a man, therefore under Facebook rules her nipples were now male nipples and therefore allowed

[Mrr T]

Mike_Mac said:

HRL said:

Me neither as long as they're outties, not innies.

You know what I mean.

Don't bring Brexit into it!!!

Are they hard?

[Moonhawk]

Venturist said:

Because men and women are different

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

[PurpleMoonlight]

Moonhawk said:

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

[Venturist]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Moonhawk said:

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

Boom.
Along the same lines, facial hair is acceptable on men and not on women. It's not a double standard, we're just different and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

[kowalski655]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Moonhawk said:

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

Actually, my wife loves playing with mine! ( For the record Luv, I fking HATE it)
Also women's can feed babies (although, biologically speaking,that is probably down to the plumbing they're attached to

[Sylvaforever]

That'll be that Facebook manager is Saudi Arabia you know the one who kept the baby killing on line for a day despite it being reported....

[BlackLabel]

chow pan toon said:

Someone I know posted a pic of a topless woman saying that she self-identified as a man, therefore under Facebook rules her nipples were now male nipples and therefore allowed

[Rich_W]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Moonhawk said:

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

Not sure on that. I had an ex suck mine, no matter how many times I told her it wasn't realy doing anything for me, but she was an idiot!


(and no I don't have moobs!)

[Wobbegong]

kowalski655 said:

PurpleMoonlight said:

Moonhawk said:

Actually aside from size (usually) - men's and women's nipples are biologically identical.

So what is it about nipples being attached to a woman that makes the so offensive.

Other cultures seem to have no issue with them.

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

Actually, my wife loves playing with mine! ( For the record Luv, I fking HATE it)
Also women's can feed babies (although, biologically speaking,that is probably down to the plumbing they're attached to

You can actually milk a man too. If you twiddle with them long enough/ suck them they'll produce milk.

[MitchT]

Wobbegong said:

You can actually milk a man too. If you twiddle with them long enough/ suck them they'll produce milk.

You must have a lot of spare time to have discovered that!

Joking aside, there's some irony in the notion that female nipples corrupt children when they're pretty much the first thing a baby sees and interacts with.

[Moonhawk]

PurpleMoonlight said:

Because they are sexualised in women but not in men.

Why would that be the case though?

A study conducted in 2006 found that almost 52% of men become aroused or derive sexual pleasure from having their nipples stimulated.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-...