Tory plans to combat Yobs
Tory plans to combat Yobs
Author
Discussion

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Tory proposals to tackle yob culture.

1. If a member of the household has been convicted three times for unruly behaviour the local authority can stop paying housing benefit.

1. Parents of 'persistently yobbish children' will be sent to prisons at weekends.










Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Both of those proposals are a cost to society.

What would be far better IMO is failure to comply was punished by sending them to unpaid work so society gets something off scum rather than continuing to finance it.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Both of those proposals are a cost to society.

What would be far better IMO is failure to comply was punished by sending them to unpaid work so society gets something off scum rather than continuing to finance it.


How is the first proposal a cost to society?

billb

3,198 posts

294 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
wont they just nick more to make up for the benefit shortfall?!

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
They lose housing benefit so cant pay their rent.

You really expect society to turf families out onto the street?

Its a nice concept but it wont happen and a lot of paper shuffling will occur for nothing. Therefore its ultimately a cost.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
They lose housing benefit so cant pay their rent.

You really expect society to turf families out onto the street?

Its a nice concept but it wont happen and a lot of paper shuffling will occur for nothing. Therefore its ultimately a cost.


Yes

They will be transferred to B&B accomodation-we have to start getting real Plotloss this is a step in the right direction.

JMGS4

8,922 posts

299 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Both of those proposals are a cost to society.
What would be far better IMO is failure to comply was punished by sending them to unpaid work so society gets something off scum rather than continuing to finance it.


No cost to society if they're on a chain-gang sweeping roads or breaking rocks, well done Howard!!!

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
B&B at whose cost?

If they dont have any money, who will pay for it?

US

Its cretinous thinking by Howard, if this is his basis for election he isnt going to get elected.

billb

3,198 posts

294 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
B&B at whose cost?

If they dont have any money, who will pay for it?

US

Its cretinous thinking by Howard, if this is his basis for election he isnt going to get elected.


agreed its like so their parents will be in prison at weekends so surely the kids will be out on their own causing even more trouble? v poorly thought through the whole thing

M@H

11,298 posts

301 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
..clutching at straws and missing the point. Why can't they come up with something even half decent.

MilnerR

8,273 posts

287 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
billb said:
wont they just nick more to make up for the benefit shortfall?!


Probably, but if you follow that logic to its conclusion then the solution is to find out the value of the property the average scrote steals per month and pay them that amount as a incentive not to steal.
The entire welfare system needs overhauling and the definition of needy needs to be looked at. The first step to this is to exclude anyone who is unable to conform to basic levels of civility, imo this proposal seems very sensible.
The money saved could go into building more prisons to keep those who can't behave in a civil manner away from the rest of us.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
billb said:

Plotloss said:
B&B at whose cost?

If they dont have any money, who will pay for it?

US

Its cretinous thinking by Howard, if this is his basis for election he isnt going to get elected.



agreed its like so their parents will be in prison at weekends so surely the kids will be out on their own causing even more trouble? v poorly thought through the whole thing


Er no the Kids will stay with members of the extended family or be taken into care.

bruciebabe

1,126 posts

270 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
The real answer is Eugenics.
Sterilise the anti social low lifes and clean up the gene pool.

M@H

11,298 posts

301 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
How about giving the unruly youth (well anyone unruly actually) a swift public thrashing (It works in Japan).

That would get my vote.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
B&B at whose cost?

If they dont have any money, who will pay for it?

US

Its cretinous thinking by Howard, if this is his basis for election he isnt going to get elected.


Well then the cost will be very similar either way won't it-but I imagine the families concerned will much rather having their own place than staying B&B.

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
bruciebabe said:
The real answer is Eugenics.
Sterilise the anti social low lifes and clean up the gene pool.


Perhaps something less draconian to start with Brucie

Stop encouraging the non working classes to breed through the benefit system and see how that goes,

Bat21

658 posts

277 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
M@H said:
How about giving the unruly youth (well anyone unruly actually) a swift public thrashing (It works in Japan).

That would get my vote.


Repeal the human rights act and bring back the stocks.
Bring in compulsary community service by way of work gangs for all benefit claiments.

birdbrain

1,564 posts

268 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
JagLover said:

Er no the Kids will stay with members of the extended family or be taken into care.



Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the taxpayer also fund taking children into care?

Plotloss has the right idea. Work gang - doesn't cost us anything and forces criminals to put something back into society. I remember suggesting this a couple of weeks ago instead of just banging people up willy-nilly.

However, due to the fact it's a sensible idea, no Government will ever introduce it.

>> Edited by birdbrain on Thursday 7th April 13:33

JagLover

Original Poster:

46,737 posts

264 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
birdbrain said:

JagLover said:

Er no the Kids will stay with members of the extended family or be taken into care.




Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the taxpayer also fund taking children into care?


Yes- but if you read my posts above I didn't disagree with Plotloss that the second proposal would cost money-prisons are also expensive places.

richardthestag

1,406 posts

262 months

Thursday 7th April 2005
quotequote all
Should read

Get rid of the Human Rights act which everyone knows does more damage than good.

then....

Bring back the stocks and ducking stool contraptions

supermarkets can hand out over ripe fruit and the victims can humiliate the yobs and their parents.

crimes can be as simple as chucking empty fag pack out of a car window to antisocial neighbours.

Penatlies handed out by local court system - no appeals process.

Now that I would vote for

R