Accelerometers any good!
Accelerometers any good!
Author
Discussion

supaspark

Original Poster:

2,105 posts

267 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
I used the G-Tech pro today and got a decent result for the 0-60 time but are they any good! Book says +/- 1/10th second accuracy.
Anybody else used something like this!

Martin_S

9,939 posts

274 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
They are a good toy - particularly useful for setting up handling (mark out a nice big circle in Tesco's car park and check your lateral G!)and braking.

The ones I have used, however, have been significantly optimistic on accleration (...like up to 15% optimistic). They don't 'know' the actual speed of the car - they calculate it by extrapolating from repeated measurements of the acceleration, and I think the algolrithms used deliberately err on the side of flattery!

They may have got better since I last played with them, but my advice would be to use them for comparative figures only, not absolute accuracy to a tenth of a second.

GreenV8S

31,014 posts

313 months

Friday 8th April 2005
quotequote all
Wasn't impressed by my old G-Tech one, but the race-tech ones seem very repeatable and the more expensive models use GPS to avoid integration errors on long runs.

joospeed

4,473 posts

307 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
cyclone1 has one and does the santa pod runs (there again on sunday i think) .. his gtech is a couple of tenths fast over the quarter mile (like shows 12.5 on a 12.7 run), that's good accuracy i would say for a non-gps unit for 40 pounds off ebay.

I have one and love it to bits

Cyclone1

2,614 posts

275 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
For the price it's a pretty good toy.

My G-Tech was actually showing a slower time over the quarter, but a faster terminal time? But it was only a couple of tenths and 2/3mph out, which is not bad at all.

supaspark

Original Poster:

2,105 posts

267 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
Mines an ebay £40er, ran the car up 4 times accelerometer was within 2/10th's every time so even with say a 2/10th's correction the car is still sub 7 seconds (just). Not bad for a thirty year old car! I've got to play with the G's and BHP next.

cuneus

5,963 posts

271 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
Race technology AP22 is far superior to the Gtech

www.race-technology.com/WebPage2/Products/AP22/AP22Home.html

supaspark

Original Poster:

2,105 posts

267 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
cuneus said:
Race technology AP22 is far superior to the Gtech

<a href="http://www.race-technology.com/WebPage2/Products/AP22/AP22Home.html">www.race-technology.com/WebPage2/Products/AP22/AP22Home.html</a>


I spoke to them earlier this year said they could do me a deal (just down the road too) but I had to have the G-Tech for £40.

>> Edited by supaspark on Saturday 9th April 10:20

joospeed

4,473 posts

307 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
cuneus said:
Race technology AP22 is far superior to the Gtech

www.race-technology.com/WebPage2/Products/AP22/AP22Home.html



yup , looks good .. and i like my gtech so much i might invest .. but as a plaything it's three times the price of hte ebay gtechs so only for those who really want it. looks neat tho ..

cuneus

5,963 posts

271 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
Yeah when I bought it the differential was about 30 quid (the ebay Gtech's weren't around). Sold it for 80 quid and it's still going strong

supaspark

Original Poster:

2,105 posts

267 months

Saturday 9th April 2005
quotequote all
I like the idea of integrating the GPS for even more accuracy.
I'm going to input the vehicle weight today and test the BHP, I have a rolling road report so It will be interesting viewing results!