Discussion
We had a 2.0TFSi for the best part of 5 years (was a 59 plate) & it was a fantastic car. That said, the fuel consumption as mentioned above was woeful & rarely exceeded 30mpg. Our's was S-Tronic & pretty much fully loaded with options.
The B&O is excellent for an in car system, however the Pano roof was always a bug bear as for the whole time we had it their were constant creaks & rattles which could only ever be fixed temporarily with a greasing & the noises very quickly returned.
The B&O is excellent for an in car system, however the Pano roof was always a bug bear as for the whole time we had it their were constant creaks & rattles which could only ever be fixed temporarily with a greasing & the noises very quickly returned.
Yup, I have an A5 2.0T quattro at the moment (same engine, drivetrain, blah blah but less weight) and get 32 on my commute, driving pretty sensibly. It's a lovely smooth, quiet, and torquey thing, but the economy is pretty crap.
Late Q5s are very well sorted in quality terms and I'd look out for heated seats, B&O, and decent wheels as they look weird on little standard ones.
3.0 V6 TFSI isn't noticeably worse on fuel, surprisingly.
Late Q5s are very well sorted in quality terms and I'd look out for heated seats, B&O, and decent wheels as they look weird on little standard ones.
3.0 V6 TFSI isn't noticeably worse on fuel, surprisingly.
Gassing Station | Audi, Seat, Skoda & VW | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff