Labour - Party of Wealth Creation
Labour - Party of Wealth Creation
Author
Discussion

tinman0

Original Poster:

18,231 posts

269 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/vote_2005/frontpage/4443191.stm


did anyone else choke on their cornflakes when they read this?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
The Party Of Robin Hood and his merry band of men more like.

forever_driving

1,869 posts

279 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
BLiar said:
Our mission is to improve the lives and living standards of hard-working families



funniest joke I've heard all day



>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 14th April 11:30

pesty

42,655 posts

285 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
certainly is a party of wealth creation just not in this country.

Just look at all the wealth from steal making and electronics manufacture Tony Blairs policies have created in eastern Europe.

JMGS4

8,922 posts

299 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Sickening how this bLIAR can speak about knowledge levels when in GB even spelling is poorer than with the septics.........
Party of thievery and lying more like...glad I didn't hear this over breakfast, I'd have thrown the radio out of the window!!!!

john75

5,303 posts

276 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
forever_driving said:

BLiar said:
Our mission is to improve the lives and living standards of hard-working families




funniest joke I've heard all day



>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 14th April 11:30


The altnerative is of course PM Howard with massive cuts in Public Services followed by a recession with rising crime, unemployment ect

diddyman

3,646 posts

270 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
john75 said:

forever_driving said:


BLiar said:
Our mission is to improve the lives and living standards of hard-working families





funniest joke I've heard all day



>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 14th April 11:30



The altnerative is of course PM Howard with massive cuts in Public Services followed by a recession with rising crime, unemployment ect


Absolutely, John. Can't make those Vegetable Liaison Outsource Welfare Officers unemployed, can we? They may turn to a life of crime.

Mrs Fish

30,018 posts

287 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
forever_driving said:

BLiar said:
Our mission is to improve the lives and living standards of hard-working families




funniest joke I've heard all day



>> Edited by forever_driving on Thursday 14th April 11:30



Indeed.

My brother broached this subject with the benefits agency ( I think it was, or some such other organisation) as he and his wife are hard a hardworking family with small child, my S-I-L works full time too and has to pay to put my niece in care during the day, they are not entitled to any benefits, they were told that they earn too much to be entitled to anything, he asked them what they would have to do to be entitled to anything and they said it was for families that work part-time, only one partner working or those that are on are on minimum wage.....

...so, not that hard-working then

Other than wanting to work for sanities sake where is the motivation for people to go to work in the first place if the benefits they do get come to as much as if they were working?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
We dont get a penny from the government for anything, no tax credits, child credits. We do get child benefit but thats it.

Now this is fine with me, I'm happy with that, dont see why the state should sponser my life choices.

However as I work and am above the threshold and 'er indoors works but doesnt earn (startup) we had a look what would happen if I engineered redudancy and worked for the business but didnt take an income.

A startingly £8K annual handout for starters.

Its utter utter utter madness.

Benefits; If not everyone can have them, no one should get them.

diddyman

3,646 posts

270 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Mrs Fish said:

Other than wanting to work for sanities sake where is the motivation for people to go to work in the first place if the benefits they do get come to as much as if they were working?

Cos, Mrs Fish, Labour know that these people will always vote for them as they are assured a decent "wage" for doing bu99er all.

forever_driving

1,869 posts

279 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Considering myself and other people on this board are in the process of leaving the UK, I think their slogan should be changed to "LABOUR - PARTY OF WEALTH MIGRATION"

off_again

13,917 posts

263 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Mrs Fish said:

My brother broached this subject with the benefits agency ( I think it was, or some such other organisation) as he and his wife are hard a hardworking family with small child, my S-I-L works full time too and has to pay to put my niece in care during the day, they are not entitled to any benefits, they were told that they earn too much to be entitled to anything, he asked them what they would have to do to be entitled to anything and they said it was for families that work part-time, only one partner working or those that are on are on minimum wage.....

...so, not that hard-working then

Other than wanting to work for sanities sake where is the motivation for people to go to work in the first place if the benefits they do get come to as much as if they were working?


I am afraid that this is the crux of the problem. None of the parties are actually addressing the problems that are faced by the nation as a whole. Rising house prices force more and more to work and hence pushes parents to use full-time or part-time child care.

Its actually amazing the costs of child care and can often take a hard working family of combined income of £50k+ to the limit.... hence reliance on credit and large mortgages. The "wealth creation" is just an illusion as we all earn more but have to spend more....

Like I said, none of the political parties are addressing this issue, meaning we all work harder for others to benefit (minimum wage, tax credits and other hand-outs). I have even had the discussion with my wife about whether she should work or not.... its bizzare as she can and does make good money, but its hard to make the numbers work when a tighter budget on weekly shopping can make the difference on whether it is worth it to work or not.....

Bizzare and worrying...

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
If you have more than two kids and a registered nanny (its usually cheaper to have a nanny for 2 or more kids over nursery) you can apply childcare credits to go towards paying them from the start of this year.

Perhaps something to be aware of...

mechsympathy

58,563 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
And wasn't there something in the news recently about the first fall in average take home pay in years?

Wealth creation, my ar$e.

Alex

9,978 posts

313 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
A recent survey of business leaders (the real wealth creators) suggested that 90% were disillusioned with Labour. That says everything about Labour's wealth creation credentials.

JagLover

46,739 posts

264 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
The entire focus of Labours policies has been to scr*w hardworking families.

They have benfitted-people on benefit, and single parents working part or full time.

ian d

986 posts

284 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
throughout their tenure they have been of no benefit to me financially.

wealth creation my ars#.

bruciebabe

1,126 posts

270 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
The vast majority of the wealth created by Labour has been inflation. House price inflation to be precise. The creation of new assets does not come into it. In fact infrastructure spending on, say, roads has been cut to the bone.
The way they spin they make a turd look good. If the population halved they would say how good it is and if the population doubled they would do the same. The fact is that the reason for the huge tax increases is that labour could not manage the proverbial piss up in a brewery. They have doubled the £ spend on the health service yet output is up by less than 10%. What do you expect from the gang of social workers, teachers, lawyers and opportunistic career politicians that make up the labour party?

off_again

13,917 posts

263 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
If you have more than two kids and a registered nanny (its usually cheaper to have a nanny for 2 or more kids over nursery) you can apply childcare credits to go towards paying them from the start of this year.

Perhaps something to be aware of...


Childcare credits? This isnt tax credits is it? Currently investigating the option of a nanny at the moment, but poaching from the nursery is a little hard and potentially unethical. But, since they take 20-something fully trained nursery nurses and pay them the minimum wage, make them work bank holidays and dont pay them for holidays, it should be fairly easy.....

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Thursday 14th April 2005
quotequote all
Whereabouts in the country are you?

If you work and pay a registered childminder (nannies too now) you can get some money back in the form of tax credits. Previously you couldnt use these to pay for a private nanny but now you can.

WRT poaching nursery staff. Most nursery nurses are starting out with a view to becoming nannies.

A nanny bought in from the open market will be far more skilled, generally speaking.