Contract offer withdrawn before papers sent - legal status?
Discussion
I was offered a contract (public sector) for a job starting in the new year and then two weeks later (that is today) told the company now had new managers who had decided I was not needed.
Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
A lot of contracts have a clause saying they can be cancelled before the start date without notice or penalty - given you haven’t even signed anything I doubt you have any recourse.
Never stop looking until it’s signed and even then be wary!!!
EDIT - my assumption is that you are a contractor / consultant
Never stop looking until it’s signed and even then be wary!!!
EDIT - my assumption is that you are a contractor / consultant
Edited by Toaster Pilot on Thursday 16th November 20:45
The existence of a contract does not depend, save in some limited contexts, on a written agreement. Nor is acceptance dependant on starting a job. It is impossible to say whether or not the OP made an enforceable agreement because he hasn't told us sufficient facts.
The two year point mentioned above is not relevant to someone who is offered work as a contractor rather than an employee, and is in any event only relevant to the statutory right to claim unfair dismissal. It does not bear on the right to notice of termination of a a contract.
Contract law and employment law are not two separate things. Every employment relationship is based on a contract.
The two year point mentioned above is not relevant to someone who is offered work as a contractor rather than an employee, and is in any event only relevant to the statutory right to claim unfair dismissal. It does not bear on the right to notice of termination of a a contract.
Contract law and employment law are not two separate things. Every employment relationship is based on a contract.
For some reason, many people are keen to be amateur lawyers. In theory that's a good thing, and a sensible education system would teach people about the constitution, the legal system, and basic points about contracts and so on, but in the internet pub people just blurt out the sort of 100% wrong stuff that you can see on this thread.
As an example:-
He goes on -
Black_S3 said:
... no contract signed so no chance of contract law being relevant...
That shows complete ignorance of the law of contract. It is a common error to assume that all contracts must be written, but a moment's thought about real life indicates that this can't be so.He goes on -
Black_S3 said:
Maybe something in employment law if you had an offer in writing -
That not only assumes that employment law isn't (as it is) a subset of contract law (with some statutory add-ons), but also talks about a written offer - in other words something that could found a contract, so the thinking is confused. I suppose that people mean to be helpful, but it's a bit like someone standing by as a doctor tries to set a broken leg and offering advice based on zero knowledge and relevant experience. Breadvan72 said:
The existence of a contract does not depend, save in some limited contexts, on a written agreement. Nor is acceptance dependant on starting a job. It is impossible to say whether or not the OP made an enforceable agreement because he hasn't told us sufficient facts.
The two year point mentioned above is not relevant to someone who is offered work as a contractor rather than an employee, and is in any event only relevant to the statutory right to claim unfair dismissal. It does not bear on the right to notice of termination of a a contract.
Contract law and employment law are not two separate things. Every employment relationship is based on a contract.
With the words 'public sector', 'company', 'job' and 'contract' in the OP it's surely not possible to figure out what 's going on here at all?The two year point mentioned above is not relevant to someone who is offered work as a contractor rather than an employee, and is in any event only relevant to the statutory right to claim unfair dismissal. It does not bear on the right to notice of termination of a a contract.
Contract law and employment law are not two separate things. Every employment relationship is based on a contract.
Been a contractor for years and I have experienced this before, last time was in the public sector oddly enough ( Budget cuts 4 weeks before start date). You can't do owt about it. Even if you have a signed contract if you haven't even got you foot in the door it can still be cancelled and even having you foot in the door your contract can be cancelled usually within 24 hrs.
Unless you got your contract directly and not through Capita for example most agency won't pay unless they get paid ( I bet you opted out as well didn't you - most do, myself included). There will be a clause in your contract to state this anyway, there usually is.
Contracting can be financially rewarding but you have ZERO job security.
jobserve.com is where you want to be now.
Unless you got your contract directly and not through Capita for example most agency won't pay unless they get paid ( I bet you opted out as well didn't you - most do, myself included). There will be a clause in your contract to state this anyway, there usually is.
Contracting can be financially rewarding but you have ZERO job security.
jobserve.com is where you want to be now.
Edited by Never you mind on Friday 17th November 14:20
jondude said:
I was offered a contract (public sector) for a job starting in the new year and then two weeks later (that is today) told the company now had new managers who had decided I was not needed.
Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
What did the job offer say, and what was your response to it?Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
Sheepshanks said:
Never you mind said:
Contracting can be financially rewarding but you have ZERO job security.
Is it much different in practice for employees?
ked! Amateurish said:
jondude said:
I was offered a contract (public sector) for a job starting in the new year and then two weeks later (that is today) told the company now had new managers who had decided I was not needed.
Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
What did the job offer say, and what was your response to it?Just wondering has any contract law been broken here, or as I did not actually receive the worded papers and sign is it just tough?
(Here in the UK)
Hi mate, good news, the DWP/DVLA/HMRC want you at x per day. I'll get the paper work over as soon as possible. Usually takes weeks though so start won't be till next year.. Anyway, congratulations. See ya.. Douche bag agent.
Edited by Never you mind on Friday 17th November 14:55
Would the doctrine of Promissory estoppel help the OP? Assuming he’s done something to reply on the offer such as quit a job...
On the face of it, it looks like it might apply, but I understand it is used as a shield and not a sword.
Would be interested to hear a legal eagle as I’m winging it here.
On the face of it, it looks like it might apply, but I understand it is used as a shield and not a sword.
Would be interested to hear a legal eagle as I’m winging it here.
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


