House Letting Agency - Wants me to renew, otherwise court
House Letting Agency - Wants me to renew, otherwise court
Author
Discussion

AndStilliRise

Original Poster:

2,295 posts

146 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Hope you can help.

I let out a house last year using an estate agents, this year however they are demanding that i renew my contract with them as per the terms and conditions of the first contract. Otherwise they will take me too court.

Not really sure what to do, as i dont want to go to court and don't really want to pay the £1500 they are demanding.

Any help will be greatly appreciated, thank you.

CYMR0

3,940 posts

230 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Why do they think they are entitled to £1,500?

mgv8

1,657 posts

301 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Very short post, need more info:
Who is in the property? (e.g the people they got you?)
What is the wording of the contract?
Why do you not want to renew?

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
"Hello, I would like some free legal advice about a contract but I can't be bothered to tell you what the contract says. Cheers".

Toltec

7,179 posts

253 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Are the tenants leaving or have already left or are they renewing for another year?

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Erm, what does the contract commit you to?

AndStilliRise

Original Poster:

2,295 posts

146 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
From what i can see the original contract i signed was a normal short hold tenancy. The tenants are the same ones the agent has found who have resigned.

I paid a high price as they are not managing the let, only finding me the occupants.



Zod

35,295 posts

288 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
AndStilliRise said:
From what i can see the original contract i signed was a normal short hold tenancy. The tenants are the same ones the agent has found who have resigned.

I paid a high price as they are not managing the let, only finding me the occupants.
and what arrangement did you sign up to with the agent?

bitchstewie

67,811 posts

240 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Breadvan72 said:
"Hello, I would like some free legal advice about a contract but I can't be bothered to tell you what the contract says. Cheers".
biggrin

And there we have it folks.

mgv8

1,657 posts

301 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
So it is normal that the agent that found your person will keep in contract till they leave. You would need the current tenant to leave or change your agreement with the letting agent to not pay them. The tenant renewed with the letting agent not you.

superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
OP - you don't make sense, sorry.

As a letting agent and ex solicitor I'm happy to give an insider view but you need to say why they have said their are entitled to a fee.


Lets get some basics

When did the tenancy start?
Have the tenants left? or what is their due date to leave?
Are the tenants staying on?
Have you done a private deal with the tenants the agents found or any other tenants?
What are the agents asking for?
Did you agree that the agent could let the property for a set period of time ie 2 or 3 years?


This may be what you are talking about. Ie you sign the agents Terms and conditions that you will let the property with them for 3 years ( you are committing to let it for a set period and often you get a discounted commission rate)

If the first set of tenants are leaving after 1 year you still have committed yourself to let the property out for a further 2 years and thus pay the agents commission. Some agents will offer such a low rate but will have a minimum letting period so that they can recover their commission.

At the end of the day the agents have to belong to a redress body but you must go through their internal complaints first and if not satisfied then TPO. but as mentioned best to try and clarify what's going on so we can understand it better.


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:12


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:13


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:14

PurpleMoonlight

22,362 posts

187 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
AndStilliRise said:
From what i can see the original contract i signed was a normal short hold tenancy. The tenants are the same ones the agent has found who have resigned.

I paid a high price as they are not managing the let, only finding me the occupants.
That's your lease with the tenant.

What does your contract with the letting agents say.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
That appears to be a secret.

Wings

5,970 posts

245 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
In the landmark High Court Judgment The Office of Fair Trading v Foxtons 2009, Mr. Justice Mann @ paragraph 33 stated, and I quote :-

“I should first make clear what I am not deciding, and what I am not asked to decide. I am not asked to decide, and do not decide, that renewal commissions (in the sense used in these proceedings) are always unfair. I make that clear because some of the evidence and submissions of the OFT come close to asserting a case that they are always unfair, and some of the correspondence seemed to be based on such a proposition, though Mr Nicholas Green QC, for the OFT, eventually made it clear that that was not his case. Mr Michael Kent QC, for Foxtons, opened his submissions by saying that I would eventually have to, and should, rule on renewal commission generally, but he moved away from that. I shall not decide whether or not renewal commission is always unfair to consumer landlords.” End

Link Office of Fair Trading web site;-

https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/foxtons-hidden-fees-i...

AndStilliRise

Original Poster:

2,295 posts

146 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
superlightr said:
OP - you don't make sense, sorry.

As a letting agent and ex solicitor I'm happy to give an insider view but you need to say why they have said their are entitled to a fee.


Lets get some basics

When did the tenancy start?
Oct/2016

Have the tenants left? or what is their due date to leave?
No

Are the tenants staying on?
Yes

Have you done a private deal with the tenants the agents found or any other tenants?
No other deal, but the rent is being paid to me directly. House repairs are a combination of the tenant and me.

What are the agents asking for?
A renewal of contracts.

Did you agree that the agent could let the property for a set period of time ie 2 or 3 years?
No.

This may be what you are talking about. Ie you sign the agents Terms and conditions that you will let the property with them for 3 years ( you are committing to let it for a set period and often you get a discounted commission rate)

If the first set of tenants are leaving after 1 year you still have committed yourself to let the property out for a further 2 years and thus pay the agents commission. Some agents will offer such a low rate but will have a minimum letting period so that they can recover their commission.

At the end of the day the agents have to belong to a redress body but you must go through their internal complaints first and if not satisfied then TPO. but as mentioned best to try and clarify what's going on so we can understand it better.

Hope this answers all the questions. From what i can see they want money on every "renweal of existing contracts after 12mths'. The trouble is i don't want to renew with them.

Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:12


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:13


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:14

LemonParty

618 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
The first time I rented out my first property we used an agency to do the tenant find. They charged their commission (7% I seem to remember) out of the first two month's rent, and then the remainder came to me.

If the tenants had renewed for a second year (they didn't - they moved out) then the agency would have continued to receive their 7% for the entire time the tenants were there, despite them doing bugger all to earn it.

And yes - they would have expected their commission as a lump sum.

KevinCamaroSS

13,840 posts

310 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Don't forget that if it is a standard AST you will likely be able to let the tenant move onto a rolling contract which needs no renewal, therefore no fee to agency.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
Just tell us what the fking contract says will you? Is that really so hard?

AndStilliRise

Original Poster:

2,295 posts

146 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
KevinCamaroSS said:
Don't forget that if it is a standard AST you will likely be able to let the tenant move onto a rolling contract which needs no renewal, therefore no fee to agency.
That is exactly my point. I think they are trying it on.

superlightr

12,920 posts

293 months

Wednesday 29th November 2017
quotequote all
AndStilliRise said:
superlightr said:
OP - you don't make sense, sorry.

As a letting agent and ex solicitor I'm happy to give an insider view but you need to say why they have said their are entitled to a fee.


Lets get some basics

When did the tenancy start?
Oct/2016

Have the tenants left? or what is their due date to leave?
No

Are the tenants staying on?
Yes

Have you done a private deal with the tenants the agents found or any other tenants?
No other deal, but the rent is being paid to me directly. House repairs are a combination of the tenant and me.

What are the agents asking for?
A renewal of contracts.

Did you agree that the agent could let the property for a set period of time ie 2 or 3 years?
No.

This may be what you are talking about. Ie you sign the agents Terms and conditions that you will let the property with them for 3 years ( you are committing to let it for a set period and often you get a discounted commission rate)

If the first set of tenants are leaving after 1 year you still have committed yourself to let the property out for a further 2 years and thus pay the agents commission. Some agents will offer such a low rate but will have a minimum letting period so that they can recover their commission.

At the end of the day the agents have to belong to a redress body but you must go through their internal complaints first and if not satisfied then TPO. but as mentioned best to try and clarify what's going on so we can understand it better.

Hope this answers all the questions. From what i can see they want money on every "renweal of existing contracts after 12mths'. The trouble is i don't want to renew with them.

Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:12


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:13


Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:14
ok

So the agents found the tenants, the tenants continue to rent.

What was the original terms of instructing the agents did you go for

- an introduction service? ie they find a tenant, prepare the paperwork, collect first months rent and then its up to you to collect rent and deal with maintenance? Normally a one off fee charged.

or
rent collection - as above but they collect the rent and renew the tenancy agreements. normally a % charged monthly.



Edited by superlightr on Wednesday 29th November 16:41