72mm plenum vs act twin carbon plenum .
72mm plenum vs act twin carbon plenum .
Author
Discussion

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Im trying to work out if its an upgrade .
There is one for sale at the moment .

How much extra air will the twin pull in ?

RobXjcoupe

3,390 posts

113 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
I think it’s not extra power but just slightly quicker throttle response.
Pi times r squared will work out the throttle area. Then compare the two to work out the percentage increase in throttle opening area smile

trev4

747 posts

184 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
There is another option, Mat Smith has modified a standard plenum to take a 90mm throttle body, I am toying with having one fitting to mine when he fits the Emerald system after Christmas.

mk1fan

10,830 posts

247 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Twin throttle, I assume, would provide a better flow of air across the trumpets rather than one central supply.

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
trev4 said:
There is another option, Mat Smith has modified a standard plenum to take a 90mm throttle body, I am toying with having one fitting to mine when he fits the Emerald system after Christmas.
Phazed tried that and the result was less power .

phazed

22,447 posts

226 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03 said:
trev4 said:
There is another option, Mat Smith has modified a standard plenum to take a 90mm throttle body, I am toying with having one fitting to mine when he fits the Emerald system after Christmas.
Phazed tried that and the result was less power .
Good memory Daz.

That was on my 4.6. What you ddin't know is that we found during a leakdown test after was that I had a lot of valve leakage going on.

I had the heads refurbed but went back to a single plenum without refitting the bigger throttle bodied plenum............ anything is possible.

As for increased performance with a twin? You have great results with your single do I doubt that there is much more to be had but as said, throttle response should be better.

My 5.5 has a triple and response is instant, you have been in my car on track if you remember.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fa5oKqEgkME

Tallpauls500

25 posts

130 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Hi, if you don't mind me asking where is the twin carbon plenum up for sale? as I've being toying with this upgrade for a while now..

Mr Haribo

318 posts

211 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Daz, If you buy the double it will always be second best to the triple ........

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Fleabay

Dominic TVRetto

1,405 posts

203 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
You just got to make sure the overall diameter will not be too large for your flow (in laymen's terms) - or as I understand it gas speeds will drop with undesirable consequences on VE and therefore torque and consequently power. And obviously not too narrow.

So you need to calculate what the optimum diameter will be for your capacity/revs and make a decision from there regarding the specifics of the various options on offer, I would have thought...

Edited to add: I assume the maximum flow characteristics of the intake manifold will have a bearing on it too, as they appear to be the main restriction once you have nicely ported heads as you do.

Edited by Dominic TVRetto on Sunday 24th December 22:38

phazed

22,447 posts

226 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
Interesting, it is not far from me.

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
So is it worth bothering with ?

phazed

22,447 posts

226 months

Sunday 24th December 2017
quotequote all
I really can’t say Daz.

Classic Chim

12,424 posts

171 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
Having read about Plenum capacities in the distant past isn’t the size of the Plenum itself an issue on highly tuned engines as it’s already marginal how much air it can process on a 5.0

The capacity of the Plenum rather than how much air can hit it sort of thing.

So unless your Plenum is slightly bigger your overall performance won’t change much.

Are the Act ones bigger in capacity to standard.

This is assuming nothing else is holding the induction back.

Then there’s exhaust gases that from recent reading is also holding these engines back.

I recently drove Peters car trying to keep up with him in mine and I noticed the instant go.
Thought it was just his engine and torque but I do think the throttle bodies gave high speed air flow into the Plenum and a sense of instant power.

Possibly negates the loss of torque you’d get without it on his high sucking engine.

As said above you’d ideally need to make some calculations as to how much air the intake pipe can draw before going any further!




macdeb

8,722 posts

277 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
Bigger plenum doesn't work as the extra air available is the wrong side of the throttle and can cock up the already poor response. I experimented for a while with the 'spacers' and concluded they are fit for the bin and nothing else. You want the extra air into the engine and not filling a bigger void first. As someone has already commented other factors come into play with the air flow and speed and just chucking stuff on here and there can make things worse.
Happy Christmas guys party


Edited by macdeb on Monday 25th December 14:10


Edited by macdeb on Monday 25th December 14:12

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03 said:


This looks like what I want , larger throttle , designed for a 5.2

trev4

747 posts

184 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03 said:
Isn't that what I suggested earlier.

SILICONEKID 345HP 12.03

Original Poster:

14,997 posts

253 months

Monday 25th December 2017
quotequote all
Do you have a picture of 90mm plenum ?

Classic Chim

12,424 posts

171 months

Tuesday 26th December 2017
quotequote all
So looking at the science of it

There’s no ram air effect as the filter or in Daz case filters are side onto the rushing air.

So your relying on compression and sucking the air in via your pistons.

Would a bigger air intake pipe be the first thing to change or is it accepted the standard one 65mm or whatever it is will supply enough air on a high hp engine.

Intakes simple to me, pucker up your lips and suck with a small hole, high resistance, open your chops wide and suck,,,, simples lots of air.

Air speed is very important as slowing down the air can have detrimental effects on fuel air mix so it’s not just as simple as just supplying lots of air.

I’d have thought the inlet manifold is the biggest restriction as is the valve/ Cam set up.
Bigger hp means an even higher lift cam surely.

Chilli car with a big handmade air box before the throttle bodies has big hp so maybe there’s something in it. smile






trev4

747 posts

184 months

Tuesday 26th December 2017
quotequote all
Sorry I don't have a photo of the plenum, I think chilliwiz posted a picture of Mat's engine a while back, maybe he will be able to hunt it out for you. I know he was running a 90mm bore intake from the filter to the plenum.