The future's slow, the future's EUgh
The future's slow, the future's EUgh
Author
Discussion

turbobloke

Original Poster:

117,218 posts

290 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
Today's Telegraph said:
Few issues have become more contentious than speed cameras and congestion charges. Even Labour's manifesto admits they will consider a new system for charging road-users. What no party explains is that
Brussels now plans to take control of all "road use policy" across the EU, through its proposed Road Safety Agency, including speed limits.

Furthermore, among the declared intentions of its Galileo satellite system is a plan for electronic charging for road use of EU roads, including congestion charges; and satellite-controlled automatic "speed limiters", making it impossible for drivers to break the limit even if they want to.


So the countdown has started, and Big Brother Pierre will be taking control of your car's speed on every journey from some time around 2015, technical hitches allowing. Good job we'll all be so much safer and happier then

Some of the likely mechanisms and partner(s) in crime are discussed here


TripleS

4,294 posts

272 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
turbobloke said:

Today's Telegraph said:
Few issues have become more contentious than speed cameras and congestion charges. Even Labour's manifesto admits they will consider a new system for charging road-users. What no party explains is that
Brussels now plans to take control of all "road use policy" across the EU, through its proposed Road Safety Agency, including speed limits.

Furthermore, among the declared intentions of its Galileo satellite system is a plan for electronic charging for road use of EU roads, including congestion charges; and satellite-controlled automatic "speed limiters", making it impossible for drivers to break the limit even if they want to.



So the countdown has started, and Big Brother Pierre will be taking control of your car's speed on every journey from some time around 2015, technical hitches allowing. Good job we'll all be so much safer and happier then

Some of the likely mechanisms and partner(s) in crime are discussed here


I would very much like to vote UKIP and tell Brussels to get stuffed, but I expect this would damage Conservative prospects.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

WildCat

8,369 posts

273 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
Und what happens if cars ist under long bridge or tunnel.

Und failure of the satellite or the gadgets? It does happen.

People in politics.....

Dead from neck up......

docevi1

10,430 posts

278 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
and cars which don't have a 12v electic supply, or ones which don't have any electronic ignition at all?

Yay for old cars

Flat in Fifth

48,786 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
WildCat said:
People in politics.....

Dead from neck up......

Wildy, I heard a good one today.

some unknown sensible person said:

Q: Do you know why politicians have to get on their hind legs in order to speak in Parliament?

A: Because their voices go all muffled when they sit down.

WildCat

8,369 posts

273 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
Flat in Fifth said:

WildCat said:
People in politics.....

Dead from neck up......


Wildy, I heard a good one today.


some unknown sensible person said:

Q: Do you know why politicians have to get on their hind legs in order to speak in Parliament?

A: Because their voices go all muffled when they sit down.




sadako

7,080 posts

268 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
docevi1 said:
and cars which don't have a 12v electic supply, or ones which don't have any electronic ignition at all?

Yay for old cars


Didnt you hear that they were planning to put severe restrictions on cars over 15 years old? In 2015, the only cars without ECUs will have to submit paperwork before they can be driven anywhere.

Good thing is, they are planning on using a system that cant think in the presence of a tinfoil beanie hat over the GPS antenna, and using computers that can be reprogrammed.

willmcc

758 posts

269 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
AS I understand the system they are planning here in Dubai will not control the car but will send speed updates to central system to trigger automatic fines.
Has a voice recognition system on startup as well.
While you could doubtless fool it for short periods that will soon become an offence.
I really think we are heading for a autopilot situation where especially motorways are controlled automatically and cars simply join the road and switch to autopilot,if you need to increase density of road use it is unfortunately really the only economical way.
As for the technology, you have been trusting your flight to Mallorca to autopilots for years and that is a sight more complicated, there are several sets of companies out there all keen for a bit of a very big pie and busy developing.

autismuk

1,529 posts

270 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
It won't work for five minutes.

They've been trying to do something like that on the trains (fewer "roads" , fewer "cars") for ages.

I bet ten minutes before the first speed-limiter-caused crash.

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

264 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
And how long will it be before somebody designs a hack for these black boxes that renders them useless?

I'm not really against charging for actual road use, but really, doesn't the fuel tax already incorporate this principle? And what the are we still doing being charged car tax? Why?

turbobloke

Original Poster:

117,218 posts

290 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
I'm not really against charging for actual road use
May I respectfully ask you to reconsider? Given that we motorists currently pay £46 billion to greedy gordon each year in motoring taxes and duties alone - not including income or corporation tax or NI as 'worker' drivers - yet slackjaw only spends about £8 billion at the most generous estimate on the entire transport sector, we've already paid for the goddam roads many times over! Why the hell should we pay again?

Motorists pay one seventh of all taxes yet only a seventh of our tax is spent on transport!! Worse, we're vilified and demonised and restricted and treated like criminals for what...for the privilege of paying car hating lentilist politicos through the nose!!!

greg2k

291 posts

263 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
I doubt it would work out. I assume it will only be mandatory for new cars, as fitting them into older ones will be too expensive. Then nobody would want a new car and through market forces the problem will revive itself.

TripleS

4,294 posts

272 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
willmcc said:
...you have been trusting your flight to Mallorca to autopilots for years and that is a sight more complicated...


Are you sure that is the case? It seems a doubtful claim to me. Perhaps you can explain.

Best wishes all,
Dave.

turbobloke

Original Poster:

117,218 posts

290 months

Sunday 17th April 2005
quotequote all
TripleS said:
willmcc said:
...you have been trusting your flight to Mallorca to autopilots for years and that is a sight more complicated...

Are you sure that is the case? It seems a doubtful claim to me. Perhaps you can explain. Best wishes all, Dave.
You're right to be skeptical TripleS. It's not necessary to go back too far in the flight mags to find several articles criticising the spread of automation in the cockpit and the removal of pilots from many decision making processes. This - according to the articles as well as pilots I've spoken with - is detrimental to safety due to the same boredom and de-skilling issues we're raising in the context of cars.

mad jock

1,272 posts

292 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
Sounds like a wonderful idea, typical of desk ridden twonks who don't drive or hate cars. They seem to think that technology can do anything.
Have they considered just how much computer processing power will be needed to track every single car in EUROPE? I just don't believe that it can be done. It just sounds like some anti car posturing by the likes of Transport 2000 and their European lentil munching friends.
Anyway, it wouldn't take too long for some devious mind to come up with a means of attaching your own transponder signal to another car, truck or whatever, and fool the system completely. Personally, I'd find a means of putting mine onto the head of the local SCAMERA partnership's car. Just for a laugh, of course.

autismuk

1,529 posts

270 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
TripleS said:

willmcc said:
...you have been trusting your flight to Mallorca to autopilots for years and that is a sight more complicated...



Are you sure that is the case? It seems a doubtful claim to me. Perhaps you can explain.

Best wishes all,
Dave.


Hogwash.

(i) there are far more cars than there are planes in any area/route ; the worst cases (still nowhere near) being around Heathrow & Gatwick, which are managed by people.

(ii) the pilots don't use it for complex manoouevres, simply to go in straight lines. they can disengage it in a second to avoid accidents etc.

(iii) rather more money is spent on your average 737 than your average Skoda.

Flat in Fifth

48,786 posts

281 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
I thought it was common knowledge that the Airbus A340 could be operated by a man and a dog. The dog is there to bite the man if he touches anything.

Seriously though, Select Committee on road pricing were told the technology is not there and will not be so on a national scale for a considerable time. They were told that the public will not and cannot be priced out of their cars. They were told these by their own Sec of State for Transport for goodness sake!

They chose to ignore the advice.

Wildy got it right at the beginning, dead from neck up.

turbobloke

Original Poster:

117,218 posts

290 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
Apparently the UAE is to introduce a complete package of car monitoring and control with the help of IBM, which says the system will also track gross speeding violations

Maybe it's a godsend that Brussels wants a single pan-EU satellite based system ... we also get more time to try and prevent it, not that it'd be easy.

bga

8,134 posts

281 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
turbobloke said:
Apparently the UAE is to introduce a complete package of car monitoring and control with the help of IBM , which says the system will also track gross speeding violations

Maybe it's a godsend that Brussels wants a single pan-EU satellite based system ... we also get more time to try and prevent it, not that it'd be easy.

With the help of IBM it'll likely go way over time & budget so no need to worry for a few decades

forever_driving

1,869 posts

280 months

Monday 18th April 2005
quotequote all
The controlfreaky Brusselites really need to sit down with a nice cup of tea and watch the latest season of the 24 TV show... it really shows how satellite based technology can be easily fooled and screwed with.

In all honesty, I almost want them to try and start a scheme like this, just to prove their own stupidity to themselves.