TT v RX8 v Crossfire or Alternative
TT v RX8 v Crossfire or Alternative
Author
Discussion

PeetBee

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

276 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Looking to get rid of my old Passat estate in the next couple of months and fancy something a bit different.
Trouble is, I only have a budget of £4k, need 4 seats, a bit of boot space and would also prefer an auto.

Top of my list is a mk1 TT, I used to have a 225 and enjoyed it, although I was thinking of the V6 this time.
I've always liked the look of the RX8, although am a little scared of the rotary engine and I don't think it's available as an auto.
Then finally the Crossfire. Not as pretty as the other two, but seems to tick most of the boxes.

Any other cars in a similar vein that I should consider? (Nissan 350Z seems to be out of my price range)

Only having owned one of the cars on my list before, has anyone else had experience of the others and how they compare?

Thanks smile


Nickp82

3,766 posts

114 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Whilst I would normally wholeheartedly recommend an RX8, the auto was only available overseas and so any available here are imports. This is not a bad thing in itself but I believe the auto does detract from the pleasure somewhat being an old-school four-speeder

S54Love

155 posts

105 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
In terms of 4 actual seats, I don't think anything will beat a RX8 in terms of practicality. Its 4 seats will actually fit 4 people, iirc.

Phil Dicky

7,193 posts

284 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Please please please not the Crossfire...RX8 with buggered engine then get Rotary Revs to work their magic.

Valgar

850 posts

156 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Out of those choices the RX8 would seem best, either budget for a rebuild straight away or factor it in.

Also consider the lack of fuel economy.


Gav147

983 posts

182 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
PeetBee said:
Top of my list is a mk1 TT, I used to have a 225 and enjoyed it, although I was thinking of the V6 this time.
A lot would say the 225 is the better car/engine of the two (V6 TT that is), barring the engine noise....

ReaperCushions

7,301 posts

205 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
Phil Dicky said:
Please please please not the Crossfire...RX8 with buggered engine then get Rotary Revs to work their magic.
Any reason? or are we awaiting the Clarkson crapping dog comment / picture?

ZX10R NIN

29,851 posts

146 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
I'd say go for the RX-8

steve-5snwi

9,867 posts

114 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
I wouldn't say the TT is a 4 seater, how about a CLK ?

Fastdruid

9,272 posts

173 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
RX-8 is/was available as an auto (primarily for the American market) but I don't think available as a UK option and I doubt many came over here as an auto. That said while I'm a fan of the RX-8 if you could find one with an auto I'd run a mile...

anonymous-user

75 months

Friday 16th February 2018
quotequote all
How about an Alfa GTV or a GT

Phil Dicky

7,193 posts

284 months

Saturday 17th February 2018
quotequote all
ReaperCushions said:
Phil Dicky said:
Please please please not the Crossfire...RX8 with buggered engine then get Rotary Revs to work their magic.
Any reason? or are we awaiting the Clarkson crapping dog comment / picture?
Work colleague has one, looks aside its slow, heavy and costs them a fortune in fuel, very, not very pleasant inside, I struggle to see how they sold any.
Audi or RX8 will provide far more thrills

MOTK

335 posts

155 months

Saturday 17th February 2018
quotequote all
steve-5snwi said:
I wouldn't say the TT is a 4 seater
At least it kind of has 4 seats, the crossfire on the other hand... nono

JonChalk

6,469 posts

131 months

Saturday 17th February 2018
quotequote all
As long as you don't, I repeat don't, choose the Crossfire, you'll be fine.

Even though it was based on a Merc, even that wasn't a good one, Chrysler then built it down to a 90s American car build standard.

It got pretty universally slated even when new.

PeetBee

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

276 months

Sunday 18th February 2018
quotequote all
Thanks for replies, don't know why I got mixed up thinking the crossfire was a 4 seater, that's off the list wobble

RX8 seems a popular choice!
Shame about the auto option (that'd stop Mrs Bee borrowing it much)

Good shout about the GTV, I'd forgotten about them. V6 engine available in that too!

CLK, looks a bit normal next to the others, but I guess would be the more sensible option.

The rear seats are for the occasional journey when the 3 of us go off together (12 year old son relegated to the back then) he likes the look of the RX8 too, but is fuel economy that much worse than the other cars mentioned?

Fastdruid

9,272 posts

173 months

Sunday 18th February 2018
quotequote all
PeetBee said:
The rear seats are for the occasional journey when the 3 of us go off together (12 year old son relegated to the back then) he likes the look of the RX8 too, but is fuel economy that much worse than the other cars mentioned?
Yes.

Lets put it another way, we bought a Mazda 6 MPS to replace the RX-8 when child #2 came along. It averages 18-19mpg. This is a big improvement on the RX-8 rofl

Admittedly part of the issue I always found with the RX-8 (and tbh with the MPS) is an utter inability to drive it economically. I'd start off with the best of intentions but before long it'd end up with a beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep and having fun again. smile

Also uses oil, not a significant amount but if you're used to cars that never burn a drop it'll be a shock. I checked ours once a month.

ZX10R NIN

29,851 posts

146 months

Sunday 18th February 2018
quotequote all
PeetBee said:
Thanks for replies, don't know why I got mixed up thinking the crossfire was a 4 seater, that's off the list wobble

RX8 seems a popular choice!
Shame about the auto option (that'd stop Mrs Bee borrowing it much)

Good shout about the GTV, I'd forgotten about them. V6 engine available in that too!

CLK, looks a bit normal next to the others, but I guess would be the more sensible option.

The rear seats are for the occasional journey when the 3 of us go off together (12 year old son relegated to the back then) he likes the look of the RX8 too, but is fuel economy that much worse than the other cars mentioned?
The CLK's are good cars & a lot of fun (I should know I have owned a fair few) but the RX8 is more fun but maintenance heavy.

PeetBee

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

276 months

Monday 19th February 2018
quotequote all
Fastdruid said:
It averages 18-19mpg. This is a big improvement on the RX-8 rofl
Eeek!

ZX10R NIN said:
The CLK's are good cars & a lot of fun (I should know I have owned a fair few) but the RX8 is more fun but maintenance heavy.
Thanks, always interesting to hear of other options smile

GreatGranny

9,519 posts

247 months

PeetBee

Original Poster:

1,036 posts

276 months

Wednesday 21st February 2018
quotequote all
GreatGranny said:
3 series?
Another good call, but I'm starting to struggle with the idea of 'but they're just two door saloons'.getmecoat
Feel free to teach me the error of my ways!