Back protection for trail riding
Back protection for trail riding
Author
Discussion

Craikeybaby

Original Poster:

11,919 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st May 2018
quotequote all
I'm looking at new hydration packs for riding, after my Camelbak Mule died and their "lifetime warranty" doesn't cover a three year old bag rolleyes I like the look of the evoc bags and trying to work out if I need a back protector or not. The choice seems to be between the Stage 12 and the FR Enduro, which has the built in back protection.

Most my riding is fairly gentle trails, with about 15 days of trail centre riding a year (not uplift). I don't wear a full face helmet, or race etc. I probably don't need back protection, but are there any downsides to having it, other than the slight increase in cost of the bag? Is the back ventilation better on the bags without back protection etc?

Has anyone got either of the evoc bags I'm looking at?

gp1699

406 posts

230 months

Thursday 3rd May 2018
quotequote all
I have the Evoc enduro backline. its great, I figured I may as well get the one with protection just incase.... cant think of any down sides to it.

the back protector is fitted to the inside of the pack and is removable so ventilation isn't really an issue.

Its very well made and the quality of the zips are excellent, storage compartments are also very well though out.

camelback have just released a pack with protection that might be worth a look too.

Craikeybaby

Original Poster:

11,919 posts

251 months

Thursday 3rd May 2018
quotequote all
Thanks, you have the one I have been looking at. Given my experience with my current Camelbak I'm not looking to get another.

joema

2,741 posts

205 months

Thursday 3rd May 2018
quotequote all
Can't hurt to have it but I would question the effectiveness of it. If the protector is not strapped properly to your back what use will it be?

Most people I know who have back injuries got them from compression type impacts, not landing on the spine. including me.

I wouldn't get too hung up on the feature.

Sa Calobra

40,993 posts

237 months

Saturday 5th May 2018
quotequote all
I've ridden for 15yrs. Techy rock gardens etc etc.

The only time I wear back protection is at bikeparkwales or the Alps.

Personally I think decent knee pads are more important.

The_Jackal

4,854 posts

223 months

Saturday 5th May 2018
quotequote all
Agree, knee and elbow pads before back.
The backpack alone will provide a little protection on its own anyway. I've rolled over mine several times.

Craikeybaby

Original Poster:

11,919 posts

251 months

Saturday 5th May 2018
quotequote all
I’ve got decent knee pads already. The question really is, are there any downsides to having back protection built in to a rucksack?

Sa Calobra

40,993 posts

237 months

Sunday 6th May 2018
quotequote all
No downsides as long as it is the right size and long enough to cover your back.

Most awful spinal injuries come from over extension or neck extension injuries i.e flopping over or landing on your head/shoulders.

I tend to ride with bottle in frame, hip pack and nothing on my back as I feel like I can move freely with no restriction and in my view more relaxed so less chance of crashing.

For rides under two hours no one needs a big or even a pack at all!

Craikeybaby

Original Poster:

11,919 posts

251 months

Wednesday 9th May 2018
quotequote all
Unfortunately my frame doesn't have a bottle cage. I do need to ride with less though, certainly on shorter local rides.