My TwinTower Pushing 750nm Torque

[Iddz]

The initial message was deleted from this topic on 05 June 2018 at 09:44

[E-bmw]

Surely if it is rated to 700nM that is only a problem if you put more than that through it?

So if (For arguments sake) 700+nM on yours is above 4k rpm & you stay below that, then you aren't eclipsing the max torque figure?

So, either do that or get it remapped again to have less than that on coming from the engine, as an engine can be mapped both up & down.

[Wills2]

750nm! OMG hold the front page......


Jesus wept.

[Pica-Pica]

E-bmw said:

Surely if it is rated to 700nM that is only a problem if you put more than that through it?

So if (For arguments sake) 700+nM on yours is above 4k rpm & you stay below that, then you aren't eclipsing the max torque figure?

So, either do that or get it remapped again to have less than that on coming from the engine, as an engine can be mapped both up & down.

Torque output with turbos is not especially rev related. In a standard *35d the torque will be evident between about 1500 to 4000 rpm. So presumably the re-map will also be from 1500. The extra power may come partly or fully from this torque increase, but also from an extended higher end rev range.
We need to see a torque v rpm chart to fully comment. (It is Nm, not nM)

[E-bmw]

Pica-Pica said:

E-bmw said:

Surely if it is rated to 700nM that is only a problem if you put more than that through it?

So if (For arguments sake) 700+nM on yours is above 4k rpm & you stay below that, then you aren't eclipsing the max torque figure?

So, either do that or get it remapped again to have less than that on coming from the engine, as an engine can be mapped both up & down.

Torque output with turbos is not especially rev related.

I know it isn't, I was just using the correlation as an easy way of explaining my point.

[Exige77]

OP, Just out of interest, which really fast cars have you “taken out” ?