Poor Paint Match or being fussy?
Poor Paint Match or being fussy?
Author
Discussion

SiF

Original Poster:

17 posts

196 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all


The rear hatch on my 6 month old focus has been totally resprayed, through my insurance. But it doesn't appear to match very well. Is this the best that I can expect though?

I appreciate that photo angle, age, daylight, etc has an effect, and that plastic bumpers are difficult to match. But this is 2 pieces of metal, on a nearly new car, and the photo is taken on a flat section.

Thoughts welcomed having had few significant re-sprays.

Plate spinner

18,080 posts

222 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
It’ll never be perfect, but that looks pretty poor.

I’d say I want it done again and see what the insurance company will do.

dieseluser07

2,452 posts

138 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
How old is the car? I reckon the older panel just needs a polish and it should match the shinyness of the new one.

Colour looks fine its just the lacquer.

Buggyjam

539 posts

101 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Is that metallic red?

Fermit The Krog and Sexy Sarah

13,240 posts

122 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I colour match for a living (leather restoration)

Reds and browns are the hardest colours to match, but all the same that is not acceptable.

kambites

70,449 posts

243 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
The one time I've needed paintwork via an insurance claim, the new pannel was blended into all of the adjacent panels so there is no appreciable "join" between new and old. I dare say you could pick it up by measuring paint thickness but to the naked eye it's the new panel is completely indistinguishable from the rest of the car.

Plate spinner

18,080 posts

222 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Buggyjam said:
Is that metallic red?
Looks like one is and the other is flat.

Fermit The Krog and Sexy Sarah

13,240 posts

122 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
I'd say they're both metallic. The right panel needs a little more scarlet and a bit more gloss.

SiF

Original Poster:

17 posts

196 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Thanks everyone.

It is a 6 months old car in Red Rush metallic, bought 2 weeks ago (dont ask!) from Ford. The original has very few metallic flecks, but the new has numerous, and is hence noticeable. And it just looks like a different shade.

Going back to the insurer to reject, but you have confirmed what I see.

Buggyjam

539 posts

101 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
Metallics are known for being a pain in the arse. Not only do you have to match the colour as best you can in varying lighting temperatures you also have the prob with the metal within the paint. Often it’s a different density of “flakes” and they don’t lie in the same direction as the original paint. When light hits the flakes sitting in a different direction it can show up as a different shade.

That doesn’t look half close. I’d send it back for a better go. Be prepared it won’t match perfectly under all lighting. But hopefully they’ll get it close enough only you might notice (just because you know about it)

Edited by Buggyjam on Sunday 17th June 17:11

SiF

Original Poster:

17 posts

196 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
And yes, the gloss is interesting, as the original is more striking, and the new looks flatter. Accepting that angles, etc make a difference.

Buggyjam

539 posts

101 months

Sunday 17th June 2018
quotequote all
SiF said:
And yes, the gloss is interesting, as the original is more striking, and the new looks flatter. Accepting that angles, etc make a difference.
Adding to the challenges is it’s a panel to panel match so they aren’t blending