Pork Ribs past Use-By Date
Discussion
Are they the precooked variety? If so then they will be pasteurised so have a very long shelf life, months and even years on some products. Being a few days over is a fraction of that life which will have a large safety margin anyway.
If they are raw then I wouldn't risk it and chances are any sniff test would be mitigated by the smell of the marinade.
If they are raw then I wouldn't risk it and chances are any sniff test would be mitigated by the smell of the marinade.
skilly1 said:
No way I would eat pork 4 days over - 1-2 maybe.
What a fanny, really!?!This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

RC1807 said:
skilly1 said:
No way I would eat pork 4 days over - 1-2 maybe.
What a fanny, really!?!This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

RC1807 said:
What a fanny, really!?!
This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.
He did not say they were pre-cooked ….This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

RC1807 said:
What a fanny, really!?!
This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.
That is grim.This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

RC1807 said:
What a fanny, really!?!
This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.
Hint... best before means safe but might taste like crap.This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

Use By as per the OPs post means like to be unsafe to eat after.
21TonyK said:
RC1807 said:
What a fanny, really!?!
This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.
Hint... best before means safe but might taste like crap.This is the reason so much food gets wasted when there's usually nothing wrong with it at all.
Last year I opened a packet of ate a packet of chicken slices that were 4 MONTHS after "best before", and they were fine. Scoffed the lot. No ill effects.

Use By as per the OPs post means like to be unsafe to eat after.
Use by and best before are two totally different things
Gassing Station | Food, Drink & Restaurants | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



t yourself dry