Don't you just hate tubby's
Don't you just hate tubby's
Author
Discussion

guyvert1

Original Poster:

2,156 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st May 2005
quotequote all
Impressed the hell out of a mate with my 996 C4, he loved the feel etc etc, said was fast on 'b roads' but not so fast on m/ways, which I felt too.

Well last week he picked up an S4 (2000), something like 285bhp/320lbs standard, which wasnt enough to worry mine, esp due to weight, but Friday, he invited me to AMD where he was going for a 'tune'. Once there he pulled out a new miltek exhaust and told me about chipping etc.. 4hrs later they bought his dyno out

326bhp/412lbs

All for the measly sum of £1600 all in!! and the car only cost 10k!..

I was astounded my the mid-range thump this thing had, like a wave of unlimited power, ok, its not got the best handling, but so much power for so little..

This has now seriously given me the horn for more power, but I'd be looking @ £10k on mine just to scrape the barrel of TT heaven....

Chipping seems pointless from talking to them

Oh well, I'll just have to keep leading him down the 'b roads' for now

cyberface

12,214 posts

284 months

Sunday 1st May 2005
quotequote all
The cyberface has a stupid question for you.

What the hell are 'tubby's' ???? I'm assuming that the apostrophe is misplaced, but still no idea what a 'tubby' is re: Porsches (or cars in general).

Sorry if this is a Bank-holiday-too-much-beer question...

guyvert1

Original Poster:

2,156 posts

269 months

Sunday 1st May 2005
quotequote all
Its a nick name for Turbo cars

PS. S4 is the Audi S4

>> Edited by guyvert1 on Sunday 1st May 23:04

cyberface

12,214 posts

284 months

Sunday 1st May 2005
quotequote all
Aha - definitely a stupid question then

Definitely agree - turbo tuning can be a tad irritating for those of us with nicely tuned N/A motors - a bit more boost and a big slug of extra fuel to prevent detonation can give monster power increases (and, more importantly, torque) - whereas N/A cars need expensive rev-extending and breathing gear to make power gains.

However, out of the cars I've owned, none of the turbo engines have been the most satisfying. Turbo lag really takes the shine off the sheer mental performance they are capable of, for me at least.

I guess the big-dollar serious kit like some of the 911s on PH (the Ruf cars of GuyR and AdamT, UV's boost monster and DeR's car first spring to mind) must give the dual benefits of large capacity *and* turbo... but it doesn't come cheap

I really love my half-way house of the 993 with an Eaton supercharger - I doubt I'll even be able to push it to original 993 turbo power (408 bhp?) but hell, there's no lag and it's great on the road...

diver944

1,854 posts

303 months

Sunday 1st May 2005
quotequote all
I was of exactly the same opinion as Cyberface until I got my own Turbo. Mine is a child of the 80's so does have lag as standard, but is easily reduced with a few well spent £££s. You soon learn to alter your driving style, and be in the correct gear neccessary for intstant boost if needed. Alternativley a lazy Sunday afternoon dawdle can be taken totally off boost, so in effect you have two different cars.

I can't compete with the monster torque of that AMD S4 upgrade, but my own £8k 944T went from 250bhp/250lbft to 315bhp/337lbft with just a £400 spend. Much better value than the £1600 for an extra 40bhp

BCA

8,651 posts

284 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
You are just driving properly engineered cars...

The experts can now remap Cerbera 4.5's to produce similar gains for £1000... mind, it'd be nice if they had originally bothered to atleast set some decent mapping!! its that far out that an NA car can jump from running like a dog at 330 odd break, to being nearer 390!

BAH. Sometimes I wonder if we'd be better off with a GT3.

guyvert1

Original Poster:

2,156 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Crikey driver944, thats some proper power !, I lack torque having 'only' around 280 , my old 540 had 320lbs... AMD reckoned if I had a 'nice' engine I'd see 15bhp/lbs !...

As for lag, he got some shiny 'things' he connected to the hoses, dump valves I think

Thunderfoot

402 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Is mapping a NA 996 really a waste of time? I've toyd with the idea of taking my 3.4 C2 along to Ray West. He said a 20-25bhp gain would be possible through remaping and installing a larger throttle body.
More importantly, the mid range grunt is transformed, which to be honest is the only area I feel the 3.4 is lacking. For around £800 this is pretty good value.

guyvert1

Original Poster:

2,156 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
AMD's comes in @ £550+VAT for the chip/map + r/road, which does seem cheap, they said they've done very few. I'm trying to get a copy of the dyno from last C4 they did...