Polic Health and Safety Insanity.
Polic Health and Safety Insanity.
Author
Discussion

autismuk

Original Poster:

1,529 posts

270 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Let me see. Our BiB have to face violent and sometimes armed criminals. They sometimes have to deal with life threatening situations. They have to mix in with drunk thugs on Saturday night.

Health & Safety don't seem bothered about that..... but ....

"A POLICE station flagpole will be taken down - after it was ruled that it was too dangerous for an officer to hoist the flag.

The flagpole at Woodbridge police station is fixed to the building and for many years a flag has flown on official occasions.

Flying the flag is a simple operation and involves an officer putting his hand out of the window and hoisting the flag - but health and safety issues have ruled that this is now too dangerous a task for officers."

So, what's the point of having the Police ? If *this* is too dangerous, they clearly aren't going to be able to tackle criminals, do high speed chases etc. or do *anything* other than sit in an office wrapped in bubble wrap.

I despair, I really do. What is this country coming to ?

hedders

24,460 posts

277 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Thats probably just an excuse to get rid of the flag.

Now they don't have to worry about upsetting anybody

GKP

15,099 posts

271 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Crikey! What sort of flag were they flying?

hedders

24,460 posts

277 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Probably something really offensive, like a British one.

granville

18,764 posts

291 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Lunacy.

Just like the H&S Executive itself.

The same mindset that is behind speed cameras, speed humps, speed limits and movement of personel generally.

The fundamental problem with this kind of organisation is that you are literally encouraging interfering busy bodyitus and the promotion of rules for the sake of rules.

Having to designate a member of staff as some kind of monitor for hazardous toiletry and wash area cleaning products is clearly insane but typifies the brand of stultifying preventatism which in istelf charaterises the breed of feckless dunces who legislate and then execute much of this pointless claptrap.

Communist dogs, you see, damn their eyes!

>> Edited by derestrictor on Monday 2nd May 12:33

MilnerR

8,273 posts

288 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Health and safety at work contains some of the most cretinous legislation ever passed. However, having seen some of the lab accidents that have occured due to complete shitwittedness its easy to see how this legislation came about. Its the same in every walk of life, you always have to legislate for the lowest common denominator. Personally i think we should let the lowest common denominator fall out of windows etc and thus deepen the gene pool a little.......

granville

18,764 posts

291 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
MilnerR said:
Personally i think we should let the lowest common denominator fall out of windows etc and thus deepen the gene pool a little.......


A bottle of something suitably unspeakable for this man! Bravo!

'King Deadly

196 posts

267 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Devil's advocate mode firmly engaged...

In the States, fat people have sued McDonald's, for making them fat. Smokers have sued the fag makers for giving them lung cancer. Women have cooked their dogs in microwaves trying to dry them out, then sued the microwave manufacturers for not fitting warning labels against this.

What America gets, we get eventually.

Maybe all this H&S crap is not to protect us from ourselves, but to protect Themselves from litigation.

Maybe that's what speed cameras are all about? Nothing to do with road safety, but to pre-empt the first case of a driver crashing while exceeding the speed limit, then suing the Government for not stopping them from speeding.

Maybe its all our own fault?

superflid

2,254 posts

295 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
I consider The Health and Safety mob to be on exactly the same level as the scamera pratnerships, their hardest job being self-justification.

Total arse.

spaximus

4,365 posts

283 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
Sorry it is all about lunatics running the world. I am all for safe working enviroments but the issue of COSHH, now do we really need someone to tell us bleach should not be drunk, and have a sheet if this happens to take to the hospital.
And the new one is Stress assesments for everyone, how the hell do you do that, I have staff who thrive on the urgency that others call stress. Now given that the HSE want a universal method.
Employing people in this enviroment is getting harder every day and when all the jobs have been sent abroard the HSE will be happy no accidents.

rich 36

13,739 posts

296 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
was this it,


perchance

>> Edited by rich 36 on Monday 2nd May 18:40

streaky

19,311 posts

279 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
hedders said:
Probably something really offensive, like a British one.
hedders - to be pedantic, there is no such thing. There is the Union Flag (know as the Union Jack only when flown at the jack-staff of a ship) and there are national flags ... here's mine: - Streaky

silverback mike

11,293 posts

283 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
hedders said:
Probably something really offensive, like a British one.




You jest....

We put a St. Georges cross in our happy bus (public order type with grilles and nasty bullbars etc etc) The flag was in the rear window.

The public complained stating that it was not indicative of the community, and as a result we had to remove it.

WE LIVE IN ENGLAND

>> Edited by silverback mike on Monday 2nd May 21:54

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

264 months

Monday 2nd May 2005
quotequote all
H&S has some poor aspects, but generally speaking the legislation is well worth the hassle.

What most people may see as common sense, other people see as a burden - and its those people who generally cause the accidents.

Perhaps if the police station in question changed the flag thing from a duty, and made it informal (ie not necessary), volunteers would take it upon themselves to perform the task, and thus get around the H&S complaints.

superflid

2,254 posts

295 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
Oh no! Can't do that.

According to the Safety Nazi's, if you see someone doing something which could be unsafe you could be held liable for not warning them not them to do it should an accident happen.

I hope that Plod doesn't read your post and go ahead, if he falls out they might make you liable for suggesting it.

Obviously, the second part of that is a joke.












I think..........




It's mainly self-justification and bollox. Take the new rules for "Working at height".
There used to be written standards laid down exactly what was needed above a set height. Now, whatever the height, as long as a fall could cause injury (falling over can. ) a written assesment has to be made beforehand and a plan laid out for each set of circumstances.

In hindsight, maybe the flag-raising is covered by the new "Height" regs.

Boston has had a St. Georges day parade through the town by the Scouts for many years.

Not this year, probably never again.

Cancelled "Due to Health and Safety reasons".

Not just the Scouts it seems

streaky

19,311 posts

279 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
silverback mike said:
hedders said:
Probably something really offensive, like a British one.
You jest....

We put a St. Georges cross in our happy bus (public order type with grilles and nasty bullbars etc etc) The flag was in the rear window.

The public complained stating that it was not indicative of the community, and as a result we had to remove it.

WE LIVE IN ENGLAND
- Streaky

DL23

44 posts

275 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
hmmm....

this morning, a 17 page booklet appeared on my desk, entitled "working with VDUs". No prizes for guessing which body of people prepared it.



steff

1,421 posts

293 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
DL23 said:
hmmm....

this morning, a 17 page booklet appeared on my desk, entitled "working with VDUs". No prizes for guessing which body of people prepared it.





No doubt full of helpfull insights such as do not try to eat the vdu when it is switched on....

Fer

7,773 posts

310 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
steff said:

No doubt full of helpfull insights such as do not try to eat the vdu when it is switched on....


And cooking instructions for when it is not?

granville

18,764 posts

291 months

Tuesday 3rd May 2005
quotequote all
spaximus said:
...the new one is stress assesments for everyone, how the hell do you do that, I have staff who thrive on the urgency that others call stress?...Employing people in this enviroment is getting harder every day and when all the jobs have been sent abroard the HSE will be happy, no accidents.


Perfectly accurate, valid sentiments.

Kenneth Flidiccius is bang on the money: HSE cretinology is bourne of the same putrid semgma as that which inspires the hateful dogs who swear fielty to The Church of Scamerology.

They are pointless, jobsworthy no-marks and represent the anti entrepeneurial edifice currently holding sway at the socialists' behest to entirely undo the small-medium sized private sectors, wherein the majority of employment and wealth creation exists.

Like Transport 2000, HSE is a cultural manifestation of sociological angst amd inadequacy, an almost masturbatory outlet for ranks of lower middle class yobbos to vent their pitiful, envious spleens against that which embrace rather than rejection would otherwise see Albion rise on high, rather than snivel apologetically in the embers of our post imperial glory.

Miserable, grunting w@nkers.

(Actually, that's a good point, if I do say so myself - have you ever come across an HSE type gimp without a humour or personality bypass?)

GRRRrr!!!

You tell 'em, Digby!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4506175.stm