RE: German MPs call for smoking ban
RE: German MPs call for smoking ban
Wednesday 4th May 2005

German MPs call for smoking ban

No puffing while driving, say legislators


First phones, now smoking
First phones, now smoking
Banning things is becoming addictive. According to news agency Reuters, German lawmakers want to ban smoking while driving on the grounds that it's dangerous.

"The dangers of causing an accident rise drastically when you smoke and drive," said Peter Danckert of the ruling Social Democrats. "I want a complete ban on smoking for drivers."

Following the passage of legislation in Germany of a law outlawing the use of cell phones for drivers, Katherina Reiche of the opposition Christian Democrats agreed, saying, "Cigarettes are just as much of a distraction as cell phones," she said. "We need a new law banning it with fines."

Meanwhile, German motoring club ADAC spokesman Rainer Hillgaertner said, "Eating chocolate bars, bananas or fish sandwiches while driving is also dangerous."

Of course, the safest thing to do in a moving car is nothing but drive. But how far can legislators go? In the end, it's going to come down to a political judgement -- and it's unlikely that there's public support at the moment for going much further than banning mobile phone conversations.

Author
Discussion

softwaresorcerer

Original Poster:

437 posts

271 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Absolutely.

Having been a passenger in a car when the driver dropped his personal stick of fire I can vividly recall the total shift of concentration he made, from driving the car to retrieving the cigarette. Had I not grabbed the wheel, we would have crashed. Bit more distracting than a mobile dropped in the lap.

Don

28,378 posts

306 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.

I despair, I really do.

There have always been smokers who carefully select their moment. Wait until the road ahead is straight and clear, and then, perfectly responsibly, spark up. They carefully smoke whilst only taking both hands off the wheel when absolutely necessary, and flick the ash carefully into an ashtray. In an emergency they would concentrate on that first - get stopped - and then find and extinguish the cigarette if they had dropped it.

The risks in the above are clearly very, very minimal.

Then there are the total numpties that drive with their heads in the clouds. Whether or not it clouds of their own smoke is irrelevant. These people will drink hot coffee with one hand whilst failing to steer around tight corners in the town centre.

Because of the irresponsible twits - the rest of us have to suffer bans on things which *can* be perfectly safe.

I don't smoke - but I'd like to be able to use my goddamn phone. I'm smart enough to work out when its OK and when its not.

john75

5,303 posts

269 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I would welcome it I was was driving in the UK many years ago when my passenger decided to through the fag end out the window.

It blew back into the back seat and set fire to soem papers glad I had a bottle of cider to put it out with to hand otherwise bye bye car.

QED

7 posts

251 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I wonder if they used actual statistics to conclude that eating fish sandwiches while driving is more dangerous than eating ham sandwiches for instance. Or maybe it's a German thing to eat fish sandwiches while driving !

shoestring7

6,172 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Penti Arikkala tells a story.

He used to race when he was younger but found it easy and really boring. During one long distance race he lit up while driving. He got away with it until the evening when a marshall spotted the red glow.

He was black-flagged, and got a telling off. The marshall told Penti that it was really very dangerous, to which he replied "But I usually only smoke 5 a day!".

SS7

Vee-X

3,317 posts

279 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
A cigarette was flicked out whilst i was on a push bike, butt landed against my chest and due to the high level of nylon in the outfit i had on at the time, i went from dressed to riding home very fast in a matter of moments, amusing you think, looking back apart from the sticky molten mass of burning nylon embedding itself into my chest it was really

that and the general issues with litter it all causes.

anonymous-user

76 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Don said:
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.
Absolutely. And to my mind, specifically outlawing individual activities such as using a mobile phone or smoking, you risk leading the public to believe that anything not specifically legislated against is therefore perfectly legal and safe.

Don

28,378 posts

306 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
QED said:
I wonder if they used actual statistics to conclude that eating fish sandwiches while driving is more dangerous than eating ham sandwiches for instance. Or maybe it's a German thing to eat fish sandwiches while driving !


His point was, surely, to ridicule the banning of a specific activity - that can lead to numpty driving instead of, rightly, prosecuting people for acts of "driving like a numpty".

Driving like a numpty is already illegal.

Don

28,378 posts

306 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Vee-X said:
A cigarette was flicked out whilst i was on a push bike, butt landed against my chest and due to the high level of nylon in the outfit i had on at the time, i went from dressed to riding home very fast in a matter of moments, amusing you think, looking back apart from the sticky molten mass of burning nylon embedding itself into my chest it was really that and the general issues with litter it all causes.


Yes yes yes. But now we are not talking about smoking whilst driving. We are talking about:

1) Driving without due consideration for other road users (like chucking butts out of the car) - which is already illegal.

2) Littering. Also already illegal.

klassiekerrally

2,543 posts

277 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Don said:
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.


Same over here in The Netherlands. Nevertheless there were some (probably bored) politicians who made up the law against non-hands-free calling.
Stupid fools. They should all go to work and do something useful!

Bodo

12,460 posts

288 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Don said:
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.

I despair, I really do.

There have always been smokers who carefully select their moment. Wait until the road ahead is straight and clear, and then, perfectly responsibly, spark up. They carefully smoke whilst only taking both hands off the wheel when absolutely necessary, and flick the ash carefully into an ashtray. In an emergency they would concentrate on that first - get stopped - and then find and extinguish the cigarette if they had dropped it.

The risks in the above are clearly very, very minimal.

Then there are the total numpties that drive with their heads in the clouds. Whether or not it clouds of their own smoke is irrelevant. These people will drink hot coffee with one hand whilst failing to steer around tight corners in the town centre.

Because of the irresponsible twits - the rest of us have to suffer bans on things which *can* be perfectly safe.

I don't smoke - but I'd like to be able to use my goddamn phone. I'm smart enough to work out when its OK and when its not.
Well said, Don!

Car53

35 posts

251 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
how many stupid people do we really want to keep alive?

z_chromozone

1,436 posts

271 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
john75 said:
I would welcome it I was was driving in the UK many years ago when my passenger decided to through the fag end out the window.

It blew back into the back seat and set fire to soem papers glad I had a bottle of cider to put it out with to hand otherwise bye bye car.


How would banning drivers from smoking help in that case


As a smoker I never felt the need to smoke in the car at any time after the initial novelty had worn off ca. 17 years of age. But, what else are they going to ban, changing the radio, turning the lights on, using your windscreen wash with lots of flies stuck to the window (excessive smearing of flying debris at speed resulting in reduced vision) FFS talking to passengers should also be banned, in fact driving is too dangerous to allow full stop.

Z

softwaresorcerer

Original Poster:

437 posts

271 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Don said:
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.

I despair, I really do.

There have always been smokers who carefully select their moment. Wait until the road ahead is straight and clear, and then, perfectly responsibly, spark up. They carefully smoke whilst only taking both hands off the wheel when absolutely necessary, and flick the ash carefully into an ashtray. In an emergency they would concentrate on that first - get stopped - and then find and extinguish the cigarette if they had dropped it.

The risks in the above are clearly very, very minimal.

Then there are the total numpties that drive with their heads in the clouds. Whether or not it clouds of their own smoke is irrelevant. These people will drink hot coffee with one hand whilst failing to steer around tight corners in the town centre.

Because of the irresponsible twits - the rest of us have to suffer bans on things which *can* be perfectly safe.

I don't smoke - but I'd like to be able to use my goddamn phone. I'm smart enough to work out when its OK and when its not.


Agree with all of that, except the fictitious smoker who can calmly stop the car before removing the burning fag from his leg. Can't be done.

What has bugged me most about all this 'ban the mobile' malarky, is that all the other equally dangerous activities various people have pointed out here are absolutely NOT banned, so we have a typically unbalanced law. If we had no cigarettes and you were to suggest that a driver should be able to carry a burning stick, everyone would laugh. Plenty of tax revenue in letting people carry on smoking though - not much in mobiles.

kooper

397 posts

298 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I would say it's far more distracting trying to operate a sat nav system (or an i-drive) than smoking whilst driving.

Have any of these German safety experts tried to switch the air con off on a new Astra, whilst driving safely - almost impossible.

Try doing it whilst eating a fish sandwich ... or smoking ...

beano500

20,854 posts

297 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Did someone once ban using a mobile 'phone while driving?

It'd be news to most of the drivers round these parts......

Plotloss

67,280 posts

292 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Nice idea but the UK has far greater motoring ills to consider first.

On that basis alone I can see us following suit within the month.

eein

1,549 posts

287 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
LexSport said:

Don said:
We, in the UK, already have legislation which addresses this. Not being in control of your vehicle is an offence: "Careless Driving". There is *no need* for additional legislation banning specific things - its already illegal to scratch your own balls whilst driving - if you do it to the extent it affects your safety and that of others.

Absolutely. And to my mind, specifically outlawing individual activities such as using a mobile phone or smoking, you risk leading the public to believe that anything not specifically legislated against is therefore perfectly legal and safe.


I agree that no new laws are required as we are already covered under the dangerous driving law. However, I would like to see amendments to the dangerous driving law to provide more detail on what is and is not accepted as dangerous.

However, as with all these things, there needs to be proper enforcement.

Oh and a consideration for all those suggesting that touching the radio, etc is as dangerous, consider that this is generally a momentry action (astra air con excepted) whereas smoking is a prolonged 'distraction'/protential danger.

cotty

41,783 posts

306 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
softwaresorcerer said:
Bit more distracting than a mobile dropped in the lap.


depends if its set to vibrate

cotty

41,783 posts

306 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
z_chromozone said:
what else are they going to ban


If someone suggests that all cars should be auto so you wont have to take your hand off the wheel we should go round and give them a good shoeing