Does she have to pay it back?
Does she have to pay it back?
Author
Discussion

wedge girl

Original Poster:

4,688 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
When my friends Mum died last year, there was a life insurance policy which my friend paid the premiums on, although there is no record of this, as she always gave her Mum £300 cash.

Probate was granted and the Life Insurance has sent her a cheque.

She has spent this money, believing it to be hers, but now her Sister is claiming she wants a third, having previously agreed 'verbally' that she didn't want the money from the life policy, just the monies due from the rest of the estate.

Does my friend have to pay this money back into the estate, she didn't take any Legal advice at the time, because the Solicitors she approached wanted a high percentage of the estate as a fee.

She is now receiving threatening letters from her Sisters Solicitors making all sorts of demands.

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I take it the sisters don't get on very well, then?
Sad.

Vee-X

3,318 posts

286 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
did sister pay into the life assurance as well then?
there by kind of due her equal share of what was paid in

wedge girl

Original Poster:

4,688 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
The Sister didn't even come to the Funeral, my friend nursed her Mum through the final few weeks, day and night.

wedge girl

Original Poster:

4,688 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Vee-X said:
did sister pay into the life assurance as well then?
there by kind of due her equal share of what was paid in


No, Sister has had no contact with any of the Family for many years.

simpo two

92,707 posts

294 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
What does it say in the policy small print?

Normally I think a policy pays into the Estate which is then sorted out as per the Will (but I may be wrong).

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Of my patch a little but was the policy written in trust for your friend or just in the name of the deceased? if the latter i am afraid she might be up said gum tree. In any even the sister is likely to try to reclaim her legal fees from the estate funds meaning that these will be further depleated anyway.

When there's a death there's always one money grabbing :sigh:

wedge girl

Original Poster:

4,688 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Just in the name of the deceased, she fell ill so quickly after her husband died, nothing was put in writting, just verbal agreement that my friend would be the sole beneficiary of the life policy.

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I would guess that in the absence of any records / written agreements, the payout from the insurance "belongs" to the estate and as such officially should be divvied up among the beneficiaries as agreed amongst themselves.

Who acted as the executor of the estate? Don't they get a say?

I would suspect that the sister didn't realise the value of the policy (presumably reasonably high if the premium was £300pcm?) and now is kicking herself for missing out!

Perhaps a "fairer" arrangement would be for your friend to take the equivalent of the total payments she made into the policy and then divide the remainder (if there's anything left).

wedge girl

Original Poster:

4,688 posts

268 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
She appointed all three siblings as Executors, they all agreed my friend should act as chief executor, and probate was granted on this basis.

The insurance company issued a cheque payable to my friend, and she paid it into her own account, not the 'executor' account.

The estate has not been settled yet as there is still a house to be sold.

vixpy1

42,699 posts

293 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
I thought at least one executer had to be not in the will?

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
vixpy1 said:
I thought at least one executer had to be not in the will?

Nope. Don't think so.

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
wedge girl said:

The insurance company issued a cheque payable to my friend

Odd
wedge girl said:

and she paid it into her own account, not the 'executor' account.

Understandable, but probably not the best idea as it turned out.
wedge girl said:

The estate has not been settled yet as there is still a house to be sold.

Oh, right. In that case, I guess there's time to sort it all out then (assuming the house is worth enough to cover it if things don't turn out the way she hopes)?

As there are 3 beneficiaries/executors, presumably the other sibling was a party to and remembers the verbal agreement re the insurance policy? Surely if 2 out of 3 executors sing the same tune the awkward 3rd would have trouble claiming otherwise?

saf

448 posts

269 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
rude-boy said:


When there's a death there's always one money grabbing :sigh:


Never a truer word said or written still ongoing here after 4.5 years.

HarryW

16,025 posts

298 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Without knowing the characters involved it is hard to say but it does smell a bit fishy to me, not sure I'd be giving £300 a month to an 'auntie', and she has 'spemnt' the money already Is there anything in writing to prove she actually paying this .
I'm no solictor but I would get legal advice soonest .
AFAIK the monies belong to the estate. In the abscence of a will there is a strict pecking order; spouse, children, siblings, parents etc finally the State. The monies are divided equally to them, there is a chance she may have to return the money IMHO. That or forego some monies lateron. Get proper advice.

Harry

>> Edited by HarryW on Wednesday 4th May 17:28

pdV6

16,442 posts

290 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
Edited just for you, Harry!


>> Edited by pdV6 on Wednesday 4th May 17:33

HarryW

16,025 posts

298 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
pdV6 said:

HarryW said:
your friend appears to be none of the above there is a chance she may have to return the money


Original post said it was her mum, I believe.

Realised that and edited my post straight away but some........has quoted it in the 30's it was up .

harry

rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
If she is an exec then there must be a will - She is most likely the sole exec but on the Grant of Probate it will say something to the effect of HER NAME followed by "power reserved to other execs" Hence the cheque would be in her name, as exec.

(If she has Letters of Administration then she would be a Personal Representative iirc.)

Sounds like she needs to take proper advice from a Probate Solicitor. Look for the initals TEP after their name if I were you (Trusts and Estate Practicioner)

From the little info. here I am getting the feeling that she might end up having to pay 1/3 out to each sister or come to a deal, outside the estate, with the sane one and only pay the 1/3 due to the grasper.

Bit silly paying out to herself anyway, should have gone into the estate and then been sorted out. Would have been one heck of a payout with £300 PCM premiums I would have thought.

(sorry no time to spell chuk)

parrot of doom

23,075 posts

263 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
When I die, I'm leaving funds in reserve to counter-sue anybody who tries to grab my cash.

love machine

7,609 posts

264 months

Wednesday 4th May 2005
quotequote all
parrot of doom said:
When I die, I'm leaving funds in reserve to counter-sue anybody who tries to grab my cash.


Having witnessed the family seagulls come for the pickings of my uncle, I shall say in my will, any quibbling and the quibbler gets zilch. I would rather give it to lefthanded lesbian trombonists than family jackals.