Mileage or age?
Author
Discussion

sim72

Original Poster:

4,998 posts

154 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
I'm about to buy a new car (I need an estate for a while, long story). Budget of about 5K. I've settled on which vehicle I want (I'm not going to go into which make and model because we'll be here all week with people suggesting other ones if previous threads are anything to go by).

So the question is, in the absence of any other information what would you go for out of these two?

63 plate (Feb 2014) - 152K - £4,800
61 plate (Dec 2011) - 103K - £4,500

Both of them have FSH from dealers, both have 12 months MOT, the MOT histories both look fine, they are pretty much identical in every other way (the 63 plate one is a slightly higher spec and has more toys, but nothing I'm particularly bothered about having).

MrGTI6

3,263 posts

150 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
I suspect I'm in the minority, but I'd go for the newer one.

996TT02

3,339 posts

160 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
Vote for the older one. If you keep it a few years the age difference will be diluted, whereas the mileage is what it is, and you will get a better resale. Also, 2 years difference in age is of less consequence than 50k miles of wear - potentially 5 years motoring for some people. And mentioning what it is may help with someone letting you know how well they do or don't take the miles...

Blanco92

206 posts

91 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
I’d buy the one in the best condition, after viewing and/or test drive. It’s the used car market... it’s a lottery to say the least.

After seeing them, I’m sure they’ll be something between them that would swing it for you. One will either be more tatty, or one will make some strange noises that warrant further investigation.

Admittedly, how far away they are from you will be a factor. I’d view the closest one first.

Driver101

14,451 posts

141 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
The car that is in the best condition.

At that kind of mileage there could be a lot of wear and tear to account for.

sim72

Original Poster:

4,998 posts

154 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
Blanco92 said:
I’d buy the one in the best condition, after viewing and/or test drive. It’s the used car market... it’s a lottery to say the least.

After seeing them, I’m sure they’ll be something between them that would swing it for you. One will either be more tatty, or one will make some strange noises that warrant further investigation.

Admittedly, how far away they are from you will be a factor. I’d view the closest one first.
I've seen and driven them both - they're both within 20 miles of me (the advantages of living in the Midlands with cities dotted everywhere). They were both exactly as expected to drive as well. Hence the dilemma (and this thread)!

wjb

5,100 posts

151 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
You might struggle with the high miler come sale time.

I'd go with the older/lower mileage one.

Lester H

3,814 posts

125 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
wjb said:
You might struggle with the high miler come sale time.

I'd go with the older/lower mileage one.
Aye. Non PH punters, of whom there are many, will be swayed by mileage over condition, unless clearly obvious

Wills2

27,530 posts

195 months

Sunday 2nd September 2018
quotequote all
The one in the best condition, if the newer car has just been cruising down the motorway it shouldn't show its miles and everything is 3 years younger so it's seen less weather a lot less.






DailyHack

4,058 posts

131 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
I always buy the newest car as I can, mileage is irelevant to me if the history tallies up etc.

You have seen both, can't tell them apart, I would be swayed even more so to the newer model.

Krikkit

27,722 posts

201 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
That's quite a difference in miles, I'd probably go for the lower one as it'll make it much easier to sell.

Blanchimont

4,089 posts

142 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
It depends on the specs of the car.
If the 63 car is a post facelift, and I prefer it, I would get that, as in theory the facelift should offset the loss for the miles.
However, if they're both the same, I would go to which I preferred, and which felt less "used"

Ardennes92

674 posts

100 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
Condition and history from me

Blanco92

206 posts

91 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
sim72 said:
I've seen and driven them both - they're both within 20 miles of me (the advantages of living in the Midlands with cities dotted everywhere). They were both exactly as expected to drive as well. Hence the dilemma (and this thread)!
So you still can’t make your mind up after seeing and driving both. Fair enough, I never seem to get that lucky when I’m looking at used cars!
Based on what you’ve said, I don’t think the newer one has enough pluses over the older one to swing it... so I’d buy the 2011 car, pocket the £300 saving and put that towards a proper service and/or cambelt if needed.

Jag_NE

3,276 posts

120 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
If everything is equal in terms of condition I’d take the older, lower mileage car. 50k miles is a fair bit of wear and tear regardless of duty cycle. You will never know if the 150k wasn’t doing loads of town and B road driving and the 100k one wasn’t sat in top gear on the motorway all the time, or vice versa. 50k miles is a lot of engine running hours and although 250k is certainly feasible, some stuff is highly likely to go pop along the way.

Toed64

299 posts

140 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
I think that there are a few other questions to be answered?

How long will you keep the car?

How many miles do you do? City, motorway, rural?

Are they diesel?

Are they automatic?

What are they? ...There are very few truly bad cars nowadays, but some cars really are on their last legs at 150,000 miles, some are likely to be fine for another 150,000. For me, a car with 150,000 on the clock would have to be bangernomic money.

Good luck

sim72

Original Poster:

4,998 posts

154 months

Monday 3rd September 2018
quotequote all
Thanks for all the feedback. I bought the lower mileage one today.

They were Passats, by the way. The one I bought is a 140ps manual, the more leggy one was an auto, I wasn't bothered about the box either way though.


Edited by sim72 on Tuesday 4th September 00:05

Bennyjames28

1,702 posts

112 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
That's not a huge difference in age but it's a third more mileage.

I would be going for the older one assuming service history and condition were similar.

As others have said you will definitely struggle selling the high miler, dealers won't want it, and private buyers are getting thin on the ground.

MrGTI6

3,263 posts

150 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
sim72 said:
Thanks for all the feedback. I bought the lower mileage one today.

They were Passats, by the way. The one I bought is a 140ps manual, the more leggy one was an auto, I wasn't bothered about the box either way though.
In that case you made the right choice irrespective of age/mileage. A DSG-equipped car on 150k+ would be a ticking time bomb before it threw up a ridiculous bill!

Hope you enjoy the car!

sim72

Original Poster:

4,998 posts

154 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
MrGTI6 said:
In that case you made the right choice irrespective of age/mileage. A DSG-equipped car on 150k+ would be a ticking time bomb before it threw up a ridiculous bill!

Hope you enjoy the car!
Cheers. It's been very pleasant to drive so far.