Final drive percentages
Final drive percentages
Author
Discussion

Zoobeef

Original Poster:

6,004 posts

182 months

Monday 3rd December 2018
quotequote all
I run a 4.17 final drive which is shorter than the 3.95 standard.
I was told by the guy that wrote my mapping software to reduce the tyre circumference by 5.3% when I entered it in the software to compensate so the software was accurate.
I've just been looking at it out of interest and as far as I can work out that final drive reduction is actually a 5.57% change not a 5.3% change. Am I doing my maths correctly?

Not sure it makes a massive difference in the software calculations as it only takes another 5mm off the tyre circumference. When I got it power tested on a proper MAHA rolling road it registered 3bhp higher than the software which is pretty close anyway given the software powerruns are just calculated on the road. But if I'm correct then that change may make it even more accurate.

Mignon

1,018 posts

113 months

Monday 3rd December 2018
quotequote all
Zoobeef said:
I run a 4.17 final drive which is shorter than the 3.95 standard.
I was told by the guy that wrote my mapping software to reduce the tyre circumference by 5.3% when I entered it in the software to compensate so the software was accurate.
I've just been looking at it out of interest and as far as I can work out that final drive reduction is actually a 5.57% change not a 5.3% change. Am I doing my maths correctly?
No.

GreenV8S

30,999 posts

308 months

Monday 3rd December 2018
quotequote all
You are calculating the ratio upside down. For every 1m that the car would have moved with the original diff, it will travel 0.947m ish with the new one. That's a reduction of about 5.3%.

Zoobeef

Original Poster:

6,004 posts

182 months

Monday 3rd December 2018
quotequote all
Righto. So difference divided by the new ratio x 100.
0.22 ÷ 4.17 × 100 = 5.28

I did have that way of working but didn't know which way I was suppose to look at the sum.