Oil Consumption of Modern Petrol Cars
Oil Consumption of Modern Petrol Cars
Author
Discussion

ToothbrushMan

Original Poster:

1,772 posts

143 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Just read the piece about buying an R56 Mini which touched on something that got me thinking.

The article stated that the Mini can use up to 1 litre of oil every 1,000 miles. What up to 12 litres of oil a year?

Now maybe I am missing something but is that level of consumption really bad/expensive cost? I am sure it doesnt only apply to oldish or highish miles cars but even new ones.

Growing up with old cars from the 90s/00s you get a service done with fresh oil and provided the motor was in good fettle with no leaks you wouldnt really need to top up for ages. certainly not a litre every 1000 miles which is no miles these days.

whats the science behind such high consumption of oil - usually drinking oil is a sign of a badly worn engine that might need rings or valve stem oil seals etc.
is the engine "burning" that oil and if so why isnt that burning of oil classed as a sign of a mechanical problem which you normally would when consumption is high. Is 1 litre per 1000 miles not classed as high these days ? To me it sounds really bad.

Plenty of threads abound on more recent cars such as Mk7 Golf etc.

RicksAlfas

14,146 posts

262 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
It's to cover themselves when the owner doesn't check the oil. Alfa Twin Sparks had the same wording on a sticker on the inside of the windscreen. It's unlikely they will use this amount of oil, but it's possible. VW diesels used to like a drink of oil too, especially on long life stuff. They sell 1 litre top ups in a bag and there is a special place in the boot to velcro it in. They think of everything those VW guys... biggrin


RicksAlfas

14,146 posts

262 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
ToothbrushMan said:
The article stated that the Mini can use up to 1 litre of oil every 1,000 miles. What up to 12 litres of oil a year?
Off topic, but this bit made me laugh for some reason.
hehe

Other annual mileages are available!

jagnet

4,299 posts

220 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
ToothbrushMan said:
Growing up with old cars from the 90s/00s you get a service done with fresh oil and provided the motor was in good fettle with no leaks you wouldnt really need to top up for ages. certainly not a litre every 1000 miles which is no miles these days.

whats the science behind such high consumption of oil - usually drinking oil is a sign of a badly worn engine that might need rings or valve stem oil seals etc.
is the engine "burning" that oil and if so why isnt that burning of oil classed as a sign of a mechanical problem which you normally would when consumption is high. Is 1 litre per 1000 miles not classed as high these days ? To me it sounds really bad.
It's mostly down to reducing engine friction with slightly less tight piston rings. See John Cadogan's video: https://youtu.be/xa1kqSo3aeM

kambites

70,026 posts

239 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
A lot of modern petrol engines use oil. The cost is negligible; the problem is anything which requires people to do any sort of maintenance between services often wont get done so such engines often end up being run on low oil which damages them.

Our Octavia is a case in point. When we bought it at about 5 years old it had a slight knock from the bottom-end (which I annoyingly didn't notice on the test drive). It's now 13 years old and hasn't got any worse so I'm convinced the original owner must have run it low on oil at some point. The consumption itself doesn't bother me in the slightest, it costs maybe £20 a year extra in oil (ours uses something like 1 litre per 3000 miles) and takes ten minutes once a month to check the level and top it up if necessary.


Edited by kambites on Thursday 31st January 10:42

bmwmike

8,052 posts

126 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
As said above, they basically make the engines half worn out from the factory. Well not exactly but the gaps etc are bigger so the friction is lower. I always wondered why burning oil doesn't increase emissions though...

kambites

70,026 posts

239 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
bmwmike said:
As said above, they basically make the engines half worn out from the factory. Well not exactly but the gaps etc are bigger so the friction is lower. I always wondered why burning oil doesn't increase emissions though...
It does, but the amount of particulate matter produced by burning a litre of oil over thousands of miles is negligible compared to that produced by burning the fuel itself.

cb31

1,266 posts

154 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
kambites said:
A lot of modern petrol engines use oil. The cost is negligible; the problem is anything which requires people to do any sort of maintenance between services often wont get done so such engines often end up being run on low oil which damages them.
Edited by kambites on Thursday 31st January 10:41
I agree but it isn't as simple to check the oil anymore. I used to run the engine a few minutes and pull out the dipstick, see where it was between the lines, job done.

Last time I had to get the manual out and then dig through multiple menus as there is no longer a dipstick. End result is it doesn't get checked very often and I will rely on an oil warning level being shown. Never seen one yet and to be honest it is not my pride and joy so don't really care. I imagine most people have similar viewpoints, this site is an edge-case.

kambites

70,026 posts

239 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
cb31 said:
I agree but it isn't as simple to check the oil anymore. I used to run the engine a few minutes and pull out the dipstick, see where it was between the lines, job done.

Last time I had to get the manual out and then dig through multiple menus as there is no longer a dipstick. End result is it doesn't get checked very often and I will rely on an oil warning level being shown. Never seen one yet and to be honest it is not my pride and joy so don't really care. I imagine most people have similar viewpoints, this site is an edge-case.
Surely cars without physical dipsticks all have low oil level warning lights?

J4CKO

44,954 posts

218 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Its tradition, Minis always used oil, at least the new ones dont coat the road as well.

I did have a theory that the VW PD engines got such high MPG as they used to use some of their engine oil to bump up the mpg, ours seemed to and people do call them oil burners.

Triumph Man

9,193 posts

186 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
What's irritating is that in a car such as the afore mentioned MINI, there is no low oil level alarm/light (in this case a 2011 Countryman Cooper S). Yes, there is a dipstick, but it's the world's worst dipstick to read! Plus it has to be read "hot" which is a can of worms at the best of times. My M54 engine in my 530i is similarly oil thirsty, but I just check it every fuel stop and it actually has little notches and a flat face so reading that dipstick isn't completely awful.

By contrast, my good old 520i with its M50 engine uses barely a drop between services.

Edited by Triumph Man on Thursday 31st January 11:19

oldaudi

1,515 posts

176 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Well, Ive got an App now, thats what the world has come to. An app I can check at my desk to see how much oil Ive got. I can also use it whilst sat in the car because its quicker than going through the cars menus to find it. Theyve spent more time making software so they can remove my dispstick

Mercutio

283 posts

180 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
I remember when Audi had issues last decade with the TFSI engine and excessive oil consumption, that this was due to a design intended to improve MPG and emissions ratings?
I’m wondering if the same perhaps is the case for other modern engines which use more oil than our old faves from 20 years ago

SilverHarrier

217 posts

182 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Our old Grande Punto 1.4 petrol used to use a litre every 4-5k miles, I always thought that was quite excessive as it only took about 3.3 litres for oil and filter change. Don't think there was anything wrong with it- bought at 12k and sold at 55k without any trouble, never leaked or smoked.. Changed the oil and filter just before I sold it and gave the buyer the can with the remaining oil and told him to check and top up regular, nearly cost me a sale! Had to then convince him it was ok..

Also, always amazes me just how low some cars can run without seizing, can remember a mate had a Nova 1.3 SR about 20 years ago, he pulled up with an awful top end rattle one day, said it had been getting worse for a few days. He hadn't thought to check his oil (for months).
Checked it and nothing on dipstick, drove him to the garage and he bought a litre, put it in and it barely registered. Had to go back for more- it took about 2.5 litres to come up to level. Cam rattle quietened down too with no lasting damage which was also surprising.


Willy Nilly

12,511 posts

185 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
My petrol car hasn't used any oil in the last 5 years.

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

209 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
My old VX220 burnt 1l every 1000 miles, never any smoke or leaks, just add a dab every fuel stop and was never a problem.

RicksAlfas

14,146 posts

262 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
Mercutio said:
I remember when Audi had issues last decade with the TFSI engine and excessive oil consumption, that this was due to a design intended to improve MPG and emissions ratings?
I’m wondering if the same perhaps is the case for other modern engines which use more oil than our old faves from 20 years ago
One of the problems VW had was the introduction of long life oil. The first owners of the cars drove them gently and the engines never bedded in properly. 60,000 miles later (usually another owner down the line) and the engines were drinking oil. It was hit and miss though. The first owner might have thrashed the nuts off it and those engines were OK as they had run in, but if the first owner was a retired Mum who pottered to the shops and back, the engine had no chance.

xjay1337

15,966 posts

136 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
I've owned

Corsa 1.4
Golf Mk5 1.9 TDI (tuned to 220hp)
Golf Mk5 GTI (tuned to 260hp)
VW Scirocco 2.0 TDI (tuned to 400hp)
Seat Altea (tuned to 170hp)
Fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost 140 (stock)
BMW m135i (stock)

None of these cars use any oil worth mentioning (maybe a 500ml top up in between services).

But even if so does it really matter? You should be checking oil weekly and if anything means you are getting more fresh oil... biggrin

Edited by xjay1337 on Thursday 31st January 14:09

STe_rsv4

1,026 posts

116 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
I had an e46 330ci that used a litre of oil every 750 to 1000 mile. The engine itself sounded fine and ran OK, but when you filling up with oil and petrol at a ratio of 1:4 it became a bit tiresome and it soon went the journey

Limpet

6,596 posts

179 months

Thursday 31st January 2019
quotequote all
My M140i has no dipstick, and the oil is checked (with the engine running) through an iDrive menu. It takes about a minute to measure the reading. It's never budged off Max, so it either the engine doesn't use oil, or the system lies.

The N47 diesel in the MINI has a conventional dipstick, and this drops from Max to about half way over 10,000 miles or so. Negligible use.

Our old PD130 Golf used to use about half a litre between 9000 mile services.

I can only recall having one car that guzzled oil and that was a 1.9 diesel Polo. From max to min on the dipstick only took about 2,500 miles. We bought it off a family member who'd owned it from new, and it had never been any different.