Contractor - thinking about doing an Agile qual
Contractor - thinking about doing an Agile qual
Author
Discussion

HannsG

Original Poster:

3,135 posts

157 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
Hi guys,

CIMA qualified accountant with 11 years post qual, done PRINCE2 Practitioner, but I am finding myself working now on huge transformation programmes. Mainly IT and Strategy focused. Especially since I started contracting.

Currently a senior BA and I might do BCS Foundation.

But is Agile worth investing in? It really seems the go to nowadays and increasingly its becoming more of a Buzzword. Especially in utilities.

SAFe? Seems like a good one and interesting.

Anyone have experience of doing it? I am loathe to do PRINCE2 Agile as I do not think it is rated.

Could always do APM?

God knows. Not looking forward to studying.

Ynox

1,749 posts

202 months

Thursday 7th February 2019
quotequote all
SAFe is a pile of crap and a pain. Not a fan of it.

I've done a couple of scrum courses in my time and use it on a daily basis. It's ok, but a lot of people get _very_ evangelical about it and forget that it's merely a tool to help us get to our end goal. I get annoyed when it seems as if a perfect burndown chart is more important than fixing live production issues, but maybe I'm a bit old school!

As a contractor it may be worth it, if nothing else to help you get through the initial CV screening by recruiters.

Never you mind

1,507 posts

135 months

Friday 8th February 2019
quotequote all
You need to be an Agile coach these days. I still think it's a load of bks but it seems to be a thing. There is something like 7 principles to being an Agile coach, seems to be a bit "new agey", empowering, facilitator, counsellor etc etc ... They are replacing Scrum masters with these hipster types at my current work place. I.T ain't what it used to be.





anonymous-user

77 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
I started with DSDM back in ‘95, started coaching early 2000s with XP and became a scrum master in 04. It’s not new.

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 9th February 01:27

AW111

9,674 posts

156 months

Saturday 9th February 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I have spent most of my working life in small teams (5 or less), and most of what I've read on 'agile' is just repackaging common small-team behaviour, eg. close overlap between spec/dev/test/deploy, fast response to changing requirements, etc. I can see it being more relevant to larger organisations.

Notshortnottall

606 posts

207 months

Sunday 10th February 2019
quotequote all
Tbh I'd just learn the lingo so you know what's being talked about.

In my experience, anything 'Agile' is just a bdisation of working practices to suit whatever is going wrong with the project at the time i.e. "why hasn't the widget been delivered to plan - ahh, 'cos we're Agile"