Modding Porsche turbos
Modding Porsche turbos
Author
Discussion

dvshannow

Original Poster:

1,650 posts

164 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Now the 991.2 lineup is all turbo it’s possible to decently tweak the carerra range

Looks like base car is the most tuneable but even the GTS with it’s bigger turbos can get 520-30 bhp putting it in the same some as full fat turbos performance wise while keeping RWD

Prob is not many people seem willing to play around with these cars as still quite new

Are they many on here who have tried it and what has been the experience? Things I’m wondering

Base cars tend to dyno higher than specs anyway is there any clean before after data?
To what extent is the remap done - how does a tuner get to 520-30 as the reasonable amount , could they get a lot more but are restraining themselves or all maxing out and using the ECU limits to avoid doing anything too stupid?
The chassis I think is more than capable of the additional power , how about the gearbox , how diff is the Turbo S PDK vs the GTS?
Any idea of the real world gains don’t see much comparing a remapped GTS to other?
I know potential warranty issues are there that’s ok but want to be sensible

Twinfan

10,125 posts

132 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I think the cars are too new for many people to have done what you're asking. Throwing away a Porsche warranty, which can now be extended up to 15 years, and making your car much harder to sell/trade in is a big decision and it won't be taken lightly.

It would be 'cheaper' to buy a Turbo or Turbo S rather than a GTS if you're after more power.

CarreraLightweightRacing

2,013 posts

237 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
Rather than play the numbers game and manipulate emissions tests via forced induction engines which are actually less likely to return favourable emissions in real world driving, like these cars should be driven; I'd rather Porsche got back to the defining principles of what a Sports Car should be: Drop 150bhp along with 300-400kg, fit a zingy N/A engine and concentrate on feel, sound, feedback...
They could even map it to lean right off at light throttle setting to circumnavigate the CO2 police.
Shame there are so few manufacturers left that consider the more purist elements for this type of car.
Right I'm off in my lag-free world to comb my beard in peace! smile

dvshannow

Original Poster:

1,650 posts

164 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
CarreraLightweightRacing said:
Rather than play the numbers game and manipulate emissions tests via forced induction engines which are actually less likely to return favourable emissions in real world driving, like these cars should be driven; I'd rather Porsche got back to the defining principles of what a Sports Car should be: Drop 150bhp along with 300-400kg, fit a zingy N/A engine and concentrate on feel, sound, feedback...
They could even map it to lean right off at light throttle setting to circumnavigate the CO2 police.
Shame there are so few manufacturers left that consider the more purist elements for this type of car.
Right I'm off in my lag-free world to comb my beard in peace! smile
That’s slightly off topic...I do agree they could certainly make a better lightweight car than the alpine - however the alpine itself does not look half bad and now there’s a viable car on sale with those principles

But does not change my question about the GTS - I am very happy with the way it handles and like to tinker around

Twinfan

10,125 posts

132 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
dvshannow said:
But does not change my question about the GTS - I am very happy with the way it handles and like to tinker around
Have fun if you go ahead, but I think you'll be in the minority and throwing many thousands of pounds away...

CarreraLightweightRacing

2,013 posts

237 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
dvshannow said:
CarreraLightweightRacing said:
Rather than play the numbers game and manipulate emissions tests via forced induction engines which are actually less likely to return favourable emissions in real world driving, like these cars should be driven; I'd rather Porsche got back to the defining principles of what a Sports Car should be: Drop 150bhp along with 300-400kg, fit a zingy N/A engine and concentrate on feel, sound, feedback...
They could even map it to lean right off at light throttle setting to circumnavigate the CO2 police.
Shame there are so few manufacturers left that consider the more purist elements for this type of car.
Right I'm off in my lag-free world to comb my beard in peace! smile
That’s slightly off topic...I do agree they could certainly make a better lightweight car than the alpine - however the alpine itself does not look half bad and now there’s a viable car on sale with those principles

But does not change my question about the GTS - I am very happy with the way it handles and like to tinker around
My post wasn't aimed at you as such OP, it was more a case of this topic garners up these thoughts. With the Alpine being a Turbo it still misses the point just like the Alfa C4 (which to my mind was a fantastic missed opportunity to use a lovely little musical, lightweight 1.8l NA lump)... Even Lotus are getting heavy now and they rely on fairly ordinary engines but again throw SC into the equation.
Shame but it is the way of today.

The GTS is a great car and the potential gains throughout the 911 line up are certainly there. Don't get me wrong, I once owned a 1.8l turbo pushing out 640bhp so fully get this argument, I just feel that with every manufacturer singing the same song now, it gets a bit boring. I just wish Porsche could be a little more leftfield and get back to its roots.

Edited by CarreraLightweightRacing on Monday 4th March 09:15

IMI A

9,960 posts

229 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I suggest you actually visit a 9e or Litchfield and meet Ken or Iain who run those firms. Techart worth considering too as instead of flashing like 9e and Litchfield they use a piggy back ECU and take over the warranty.

With firms like the ones I’ve mentioned reliability is more important than headline numbers or crazy performance stats.

Lots of other firms out there but as your questions highlight lots of them do no proper R&D and do not consider the long term reliability of the car they are tuning.

Personally I think all a GTS needs is a free flowing exhaust like an akrapovic

Grantstown

1,348 posts

115 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I'm certainly going to consider getting the Litchfield remap, exhaust mods, suspension/steering mods when I get past the 2 year service. I think it'll become much more common to do this to optimise a car that'll be mainly for the road. The mindset would have to be one of keeping the car for a good period of time and being prepared to write a big cheque should the worst happen.

GT3ZZZ

1,007 posts

198 months

Monday 4th March 2019
quotequote all
I have a 2018 991.2 Carrera T, tuned by 9e with a full Kline exhaust system (200 cell cats) and its making 490 WHP so 540-550 PS at the crank.

My car has its own tune, developed via Vbox and laptop with an iterative process of driving, analysing and tuning rather than an off the shelf map or piggyback. It was transformed when I got it back, felt it was towing a few caravans before compared to now.

The intercoolers are the limiting factor on 991.2 as the airflow is poor (raise the wing to improve) but 9e have some better ones with aerospace cores in the pipeline. Fitting these along with an upgraded Sachs clutch and GTS sized turbos or bigger should see 600PS+. There's more there without these but Ken was being kind to my manual box in its OEM state

Edited by GT3ZZZ on Monday 4th March 19:09

dvshannow

Original Poster:

1,650 posts

164 months

Tuesday 5th March 2019
quotequote all
Will give ltchfield and 9e a call 9e seem to suggest more gains but change more and switch the plugs not sure how much impact the plugs have

Really need to call as the GTS seems to be on as an afterthought on the sites quoted original power being same as the S for example