Mirrorless suggestion with Best Out of camera JPEG's?
Discussion
Currently I use my pixel phone for photos as I'm yet to find a camera that can beat it in good light for what I'm doing with 0 post-processing from my side, but I need to as the pixel isn't perfect in other things and slows me down due to the non-swappable batteries.
Here are 2 sets of photos taken with pixel and a very decent Nikon + very decent Prime lens..
https://imgur.com/a/eY4kAig
The images are taken at the same time/in the same good light, the images with pixel are very sharp , everything in good focus, the colours are very pleasing and I like the images very much. with the dslr they are just meh...I know my skills aren't top-tier, but I realize in photography the way the photos are processed is much more important than the sensor itself, I'm looking for a camera that can do it the best and get the best result with its own processing.
Both are straight out of camera JPEG's on auto.
I DO NOT have the time required to post-process 1000/pictures day when pixel does it on auto and gives great result instantly with no faff involved or wresting with a dslr to get it to focus on the item I exactly want when the pixel does it with a simple touch on a screen.
I want to find a camera that can perform like my google pixel phone or even better, but it would be an actual camera with swappable batteries!
Also I DO NOT want the crazy Bokeh thing in my pictures some people like so much, I need a camera to which I can tell easily to get in focus lots of objects at the same time (like in those pictures I posted as I mostly shoot pictures like that with lots of objects that all need to be in good focus/detail)
I heard the Fujis get good JPEG's straight out of the cameras?
I see the x-t100 is super super cheap , fairly new model ,touchscreen for focusing and has more or less the same image quality as much more expensive x-t2/x-t3 ? I have no idea about the images you can get from them tho on auto as I have never had Fuji cameras and I just heard about that model an hour ago.
Can anyone suggest me something that would fit my needs?
Is there anything much better than the x-t100?
I have had sony a6000 and a5100 , while on paper they look good in reality they are just like a dslr- plain looking /Meh... photos straight out of the camera if you don't post-process them.
I do not have a budget, as I use the thing everyday and if it will save me time it will pay off it itself.
The x-t100 happens to have all those features, but also is very cheap so that's a bonus I guess.
Here are 2 sets of photos taken with pixel and a very decent Nikon + very decent Prime lens..
https://imgur.com/a/eY4kAig
The images are taken at the same time/in the same good light, the images with pixel are very sharp , everything in good focus, the colours are very pleasing and I like the images very much. with the dslr they are just meh...I know my skills aren't top-tier, but I realize in photography the way the photos are processed is much more important than the sensor itself, I'm looking for a camera that can do it the best and get the best result with its own processing.
Both are straight out of camera JPEG's on auto.
I DO NOT have the time required to post-process 1000/pictures day when pixel does it on auto and gives great result instantly with no faff involved or wresting with a dslr to get it to focus on the item I exactly want when the pixel does it with a simple touch on a screen.
I want to find a camera that can perform like my google pixel phone or even better, but it would be an actual camera with swappable batteries!
Also I DO NOT want the crazy Bokeh thing in my pictures some people like so much, I need a camera to which I can tell easily to get in focus lots of objects at the same time (like in those pictures I posted as I mostly shoot pictures like that with lots of objects that all need to be in good focus/detail)
I heard the Fujis get good JPEG's straight out of the cameras?
I see the x-t100 is super super cheap , fairly new model ,touchscreen for focusing and has more or less the same image quality as much more expensive x-t2/x-t3 ? I have no idea about the images you can get from them tho on auto as I have never had Fuji cameras and I just heard about that model an hour ago.
Can anyone suggest me something that would fit my needs?
Is there anything much better than the x-t100?
I have had sony a6000 and a5100 , while on paper they look good in reality they are just like a dslr- plain looking /Meh... photos straight out of the camera if you don't post-process them.
I do not have a budget, as I use the thing everyday and if it will save me time it will pay off it itself.
The x-t100 happens to have all those features, but also is very cheap so that's a bonus I guess.
Gassing Station | Computers, Gadgets & Stuff | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff