The Ambiguity of Social Media Censorship
The Ambiguity of Social Media Censorship
Author
Discussion

StevieBee

Original Poster:

15,336 posts

285 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
I'm not a Social Media fanboy by any means but use various platforms professionally and it does have some handy uses which keeps me in the loop. But a couple if incidents recently sparked an ironic contradiction in terms of what is and isn't acceptable.

A few weeks back, I was in Cyprus for work and ended up in a Karaoke bar (Whiskey Joes, Kyrenia - highly recommended!) with some colleagues whereupon, emboldened by EFES and others, I completely mullered Ian Dury's Hit me With Your Rhythm Stick; a moment captured on video by my OH who was also tagging along. At the request of those that were not there, an attempt was made to post it on Facebook who kicked it off due to copyright infringement.

Next...

A few months back, I was invited to join a Facebook Group pitched as a place for men to banter, share man jokes and the like. Started off fine and typical of what you'd expect; rude jokes, the odd boob, bum, etc. Then this new chap turns up and starts posting some truly horrendous videos; workers falling to their deaths from high buildings with the impact shown, some bloke getting shot in the face at point blank range. Really, really horrible stuff. Someone else in the group who I know personally reported these to Facebook but because the videos had a warning screen and the option not to watch, no action was taken though the bloke posting them has been removed from the group.

So there you have it - badly rendered versions of songs: Not acceptable. Videos of people getting killed: Acceptable.


eybic

9,212 posts

204 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
It is ridiculous. I've reported Marketplace posts before that clearly break rules but nothing is done, what makes it worse is that your options are very limited in terms of reporting.

Silverbullet767

11,299 posts

236 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
So there you have it - badly rendered versions of songs: Not acceptable. Videos of people getting killed: Acceptable.
Badly rendered versions of songs, possible copyright infringement and possible loss of income for the label involved. Video of people getting killed? No money in that I'm afraid. Watch away. It's all about the money, horrible but true.

J4CKO

46,839 posts

230 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
Silverbullet767 said:
StevieBee said:
So there you have it - badly rendered versions of songs: Not acceptable. Videos of people getting killed: Acceptable.
Badly rendered versions of songs, possible copyright infringement and possible loss of income for the label involved. Video of people getting killed? No money in that I'm afraid. Watch away. It's all about the money, horrible but true.
Yeah, how many folk are going to get SteviesBees rendition for free in place of the studio original ?

And who posts videos of people getting killed ? needs help.

rodericb

8,881 posts

156 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Here's how they might respond: https://youtu.be/yUx6YLzGXbY It's a Tim Pool video about social credit and how it could end up in western countries.

Spare tyre

12,567 posts

160 months

Thursday 23rd May 2019
quotequote all
The copyright thing is automated, so no effort (£££) required to police