DB Cameras coming to a street near you
DB Cameras coming to a street near you
Author
Discussion

Charliecloud

Original Poster:

308 posts

228 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Story here:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48564995


trickywoo

14,257 posts

261 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
RJ will be worried.

I’ve always wondered how he gets away with his trademark exhaust blare in London.

Having said that he is a very good example that a noisy exhaust is a useful safety feature.

The cynic in me says it’s a computer administered money making exercise.

av185

20,464 posts

158 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Anything that gets rid of overloud farty exhaust fakery as a substitute for true performance gets my vote.

crystaltips

41 posts

109 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
This is ridiculous. Yet another example of petty-mindedness by the authorities. What about putting efforts into solving motorcycle thefts, violent crime, or just anything that affects the majority of us rather than always looking after the liberal elite. This country is slowly but surely becoming the LA we see in Demolition Man!!

I own a ‘noisy’ Ducati so I am sure I’ll be censored in time. Soon fun will be taxed.

TimmyWimmyWoo

4,364 posts

212 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
This feels like a lot of unnecessary expenditure.

We clearly just need to ban sales of loud exhausts for any regular firing order I4, any Harley and any 125cc four-stroke single.

CAPP0

20,881 posts

234 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
I know it's an easy thing to say but it does make you wonder how the brains of those in authority tick. We have the highest level of bike theft issues ever, we have the poxy moped gangs, we have someone getting stabbed every 5 minutes - and they trumpet this as a great thing.

Obviously I don't know what the reason was but the other day on the way to work I saw a bike pulled over by a bike cop. The pulled bike was a Deauville or similar, so, less likely to have had a loud exhaust/small plate/been ridden overly fast, but still, someone needed to interrupt the guy's commute.

Those in authority really don't do themselves any favours whatsoever these days. Low-hanging fruit, anyone?

srob

12,556 posts

269 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
I wonder how this will work for old bikes?

Some of ours are very loud, but they just ‘are’. That’s the way they were built in the 1920s, and it wouldn’t really be possible to make them quiet.

Unbusy

934 posts

128 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Where on earth do they find the resources and money to come up with utter stte like this?
I wouldn’t mind if they could get a grip on the real issues. As said, low hanging fruit.
I had thought I was turning into a grumpy old man but now I realise it’s not my fault when this type of thing happens.

vtr1000f

18 posts

90 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Can't happen soon enough - we have some tt riding around the local (narrow) streets every morning at around 07:15 with an offensive (to me) loud pipe fitted. When said tt sees someone to impress he's likely to rev the nuts off it whilst using the quick shifter to 'enhance' the din.


jamiehamy

360 posts

207 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all

Vanordinaire

3,701 posts

193 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
I can't see how on earth it would work. How can they prove where the noise is coming from? Someone could easily be standing next to the noise sensor with a whistle or something else noisy as you are passing the camera. A relatively quiet noise from a source a few mm from the detector would give a high reading if assumed to be a vehicle 50 metres away.
Has a whiff of bullst to me, something like the old TV detector vans, conning people into admitting to something that couldn't be proved in court.

wa16

2,423 posts

252 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
the slow creep to totalitarianism

one day, in the not too distant future, there will be a fine for laughing unless the state says it ok

in many ways, i'm glad i won't be around for a lot longer, i dread to think what life will be like in another 25 years with crap like this and we just put up with it why?

Krikkit

27,938 posts

212 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Vanordinaire said:
I can't see how on earth it would work. How can they prove where the noise is coming from? Someone could easily be standing next to the noise sensor with a whistle or something else noisy as you are passing the camera. A relatively quiet noise from a source a few mm from the detector would give a high reading if assumed to be a vehicle 50 metres away.
Has a whiff of bullst to me, something like the old TV detector vans, conning people into admitting to something that couldn't be proved in court.
Two pairs of directional microphones with a relatively tight beam would manage it no bother.

chunder27

2,309 posts

239 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Have to admit, the older I get, the less ridiculously noisy cars and bikes I can tolerate.

there really is little need for it, the vast majority of people who do it are showing off.

So for me it's not a big deal.

if you really want to be noisy and be the centre of attention do it on a track, where you will likely be fairly insignificant in yer shorts, t short and a hi viz! As they seem to be the morons doing it mostly.

Pothole

34,367 posts

313 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Obviously I don't know what the reason was but the other day on the way to work I saw a bike pulled over by a bike cop. The pulled bike was a Deauville or similar, so, less likely to have had a loud exhaust/small plate/been ridden overly fast, but still, someone needed to interrupt the guy's commute.
Still, someone needed to make a judgement based on bugger all.

CAPP0

20,881 posts

234 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
Pothole said:
CAPP0 said:
Obviously I don't know what the reason was but the other day on the way to work I saw a bike pulled over by a bike cop. The pulled bike was a Deauville or similar, so, less likely to have had a loud exhaust/small plate/been ridden overly fast, but still, someone needed to interrupt the guy's commute.
Still, someone needed to make a judgement based on bugger all.
What part of "Obviously I don't know what the reason was" did you struggle with most?

Edited by CAPP0 on Saturday 8th June 18:56

dern

14,055 posts

310 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
If it simply stops the arse being ragged off noisy bikes in residential areas I'm ok with that.

av185

20,464 posts

158 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
chunder27 said:
if you really want to be noisy and be the centre of attention do it on a track, where you will likely be fairly insignificant in yer shorts, t short and a hi viz! As they seem to be the morons doing it mostly.
Proper tracks have noise limits and if these are exceeded you are flagged then banned.

Pothole

34,367 posts

313 months

Saturday 8th June 2019
quotequote all
CAPP0 said:
Pothole said:
CAPP0 said:
Obviously I don't know what the reason was but the other day on the way to work I saw a bike pulled over by a bike cop. The pulled bike was a Deauville or similar, so, less likely to have had a loud exhaust/small plate/been ridden overly fast, but still, someone needed to interrupt the guy's commute.
Still, someone needed to make a judgement based on bugger all.
What part of "Obviously I don't know what the reason was" did you struggle with most?

Edited by CAPP0 on Saturday 8th June 18:56
Now I'm completely confused. Was that just a cool starry bra?