Which take precedence, Will or Court Order
Which take precedence, Will or Court Order
Author
Discussion

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
Just a quick query, as i cannot find the answer on Google.

Which document would take precedence, in the event of a death.

For example, as part of an divorce from 10 years ago, a court order was in place to state that the full life insurance policy (£1M million) was to be paid to the ex wife and child, in the event of death of the policy holder. There was no Will at the time of the order being put into place.

However a Will was subsequently written within the last 2 years, which states that only 50% of that policy was to be paid to the ex wife and child, and the remaining 50% is to be split with the new partner/family of the recently deceased.

There has been no change to the actual details of the policy (as in the trustee, beneficiary). Only that there is now a Will that states that there is a 50/50 split.

Does the court order still take precedence, or the Will?

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

260 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
I would have thought its down to the Trustees of the policy, If you are on the side of the original recipient, a quick email to them might help.

Dave Hedgehog

16,335 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
as a layperson i would expect the order to stand

once made the policy was no longer the 'property' of the policy holder and so could not assign it to anyone else


will be interesting to see what the law actually says

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
The trustee of the policy is the ex-wife.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

260 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
bunchofkeys said:
The trustee of the policy is the ex-wife.
No she isn't. The trustees are the folks who actually run the company with whom the deceased was insured. They will have written instructions from the deceased as to his wishes. They can deviate from those wishes where the policy holder has remarried, but the Court Order should be shown to them.

The policy does not, and cannot, form part of the deceased estate, because it wasn't there in life. So the will should not play a part here, unless the estate is big enough to pay the bequest from, disregarding the policy. Not a lawyer, but that's the way it was explained to me on divorce.

NGee

2,952 posts

193 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
I am certainly not a lawyer and have no idea of the legal side of it all but surely it would be pretty pointless getting a court order if it could be simply over-ridden by just writting a will.
I would say the court order must trump the will - but just my opinion. (Although the law can be pretty daft at times!!)

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
On part of the form, it does state an additional trustee to be named, which is a requirement.
The details are of the ex-wife.

So from my understanding, they are the ones that could be 100% in befit of the policy; if it were not for the Will.
Yet, with the Will in place, they would also need to execute the wish of the deceased, in terms of splitting it 50/50.

However, the Court Order...

I'm guessing it's not that easy and will need to be addressed in Court.

LeoSayer

7,827 posts

273 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
From my understanding, life insurance payouts do not form part of the estate so the will doesn't affect it.

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
LeoSayer said:
From my understanding, life insurance payouts do not form part of the estate so the will doesn't affect it.
Ah, now that's an interesting point.

Yes, the payout is wrapped up in a Trust, so not part of the Estate.

super7

2,252 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
Surely the court order trumps the will..... other wise we can all just go around ignoring the court, and therefore the law of the land and make our own choices in the will?

My guess is that you'd need a variation on the court order and I doubt your ex will agree to loosing 1m!!

If you want to protect your new partner/familly you'd need to take out a new life insurance policy.

pavarotti1980

6,343 posts

113 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
super7 said:
Surely the court order trumps the will..... other wise we can all just go around ignoring the court, and therefore the law of the land and make our own choices in the will?

My guess is that you'd need a variation on the court order and I doubt your ex will agree to loosing 1m!!

If you want to protect your new partner/familly you'd need to take out a new life insurance policy.
Does this mean that potentially the OP is posting from beyond the grave?

Dave Hedgehog

16,335 posts

233 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
pavarotti1980 said:
Does this mean that potentially the OP is posting from beyond the grave?
brings new meaning to thread necromancy

hutchst

3,727 posts

125 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
You can't leave something in your will that doesn't belong to you

InitialDave

15,109 posts

148 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
Could you have a policy that makes the beneficiary of the insurance payout "as detailed in my will"?

I can't see why the insurers would object, it makes little odds to them who the money goes to.

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
hutchst said:
You can't leave something in your will that doesn't belong to you
That being, because the payout is wrapped in a Trust, which makes it separate from the Estate, and thus irrelevant of the Will?

Red Devil

13,516 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
From the description I suspect it will be the beneficiary of the trust who will be doing any objecting.
Even a sniff of losing 50% of a court ordered settlement tends to focus the mind.

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
InitialDave said:
Could you have a policy that makes the beneficiary of the insurance payout "as detailed in my will"?

I can't see why the insurers would object, it makes little odds to them who the money goes to.
I agree that the insurers couldn't give two hoots, they've covered their end with a payout.
The messy bit is how it's divided.

super7

2,252 posts

237 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
Yes... but you have an Order from the court to give that 1m life insurance to you ex. If you try splitting it two ways, surely your ex will go back to court to enforce the Order, and my guess is that she'd win. YOU agreed that by signing the Court Order. Now your changing your mind...... don't think it'll work!


Oakey

27,981 posts

245 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
Why would someone not look to have the court order amended if they had started a new family?

bunchofkeys

Original Poster:

1,300 posts

97 months

Wednesday 10th July 2019
quotequote all
super7 said:
Yes... but you have an Order from the court to give that 1m life insurance to you ex. If you try splitting it two ways, surely your ex will go back to court to enforce the Order, and my guess is that she'd win. YOU agreed that by signing the Court Order. Now your changing your mind...... don't think it'll work!
Nothing is quoted in terms of how much should be given, just that the ex wife is the beneficiary of the policy.