Accident, other party changes story after repairs
Accident, other party changes story after repairs
Author
Discussion

CSLchappie

Original Poster:

442 posts

233 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
I was involved in a minor accident a couple of weeks back, in the image below I’d parked on the left in A, I reversed out of the space to leave ending up over the white arrow, I had to stop momentarily (I honestly can’t remember the reason why, possibly someone crossing the road or another car pulling out in front of me) either way I was stationary when the car in space B reversed straight out hitting my rear wheel arch. The driver and her passenger were not looking what they were doing as I could clearly see them facing forward and talking, also I sounded my horn a fraction of a second before they hit my car.



The other driver was very apologetic, said it was all her fault etc. We swapped details and went on our way. I reported the incident about 10 minutes later and informed my insurance that I’d prefer BMW’s bodyshop to deal with the repair, within 48 hours car had been assessed and costs approved (£1500) A week later the car went into the bodyshop for three days.

Whilst driving home after collecting the car from being repaired I got a phone call from my insurer, the other party is claiming that we were both reversing at the same time and their insurer is offering 50/50 - to which I told them where to go.

I’ve since provided a full breakdown of the event with pictures from the day and google maps to illustrate who was where and when.
There is no dash camera footage, there is very likely CCTV from adjacent shops and council cameras which I have told my insurer about.
I was driving with my partner in the car, the other driver had what I assume to be their teenage daughter in their car.
My partner’s 29 year old son and his friend witnessed the whole incident as we had met them to drop something off and they were still loading their car up.

Based on conversations with my insurer (L&V) I have a sinking feeling that I’m going to get shafted on this, in the event this happens is there any merit in following up outside of insurance, for example small claims court to reclaim excess?

Zetec-S

6,883 posts

122 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
CSLchappie said:
There is no dash camera footage, there is very likely CCTV from adjacent shops and council cameras which I have told my insurer about.
Have you asked for the CCTV footage? I imagine time is ticking before it gets overwritten, so even if your insurance company gets round to requesting it (which they probably won't) it might no longer be available.

tony wright

1,042 posts

279 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
I struggle to work out why people do this. Is there a difference between a fault claim and 50/50? You would think the guilt would help them to “do the right thing”

caziques

2,842 posts

197 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all

If you were moving then your vehicle would be scraped rather than just damaged.

Photos would show one way or the other.

popeyewhite

23,033 posts

149 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
tony wright said:
I struggle to work out why people do this. Is there a difference between a fault claim and 50/50? You would think the guilt would help them to “do the right thing”
They think they will pay less on their following insurance policy if they go 50/50 rather than accept full culpability. Any feelings of guilt are overshadowed by the blind horror of what their insurance company may apparently randomly charge for their next policy and for God knows how long into the future. Understandable in that context really.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

185 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
CSLchappie said:
I was involved in a minor accident a couple of weeks back, in the image below I’d parked on the left in A, I reversed out of the space to leave ending up over the white arrow, I had to stop momentarily (I honestly can’t remember the reason why, possibly someone crossing the road or another car pulling out in front of me) either way I was stationary when the car in space B reversed straight out hitting my rear wheel arch. The driver and her passenger were not looking what they were doing as I could clearly see them facing forward and talking, also I sounded my horn a fraction of a second before they hit my car.



The other driver was very apologetic, said it was all her fault etc. We swapped details and went on our way. I reported the incident about 10 minutes later and informed my insurance that I’d prefer BMW’s bodyshop to deal with the repair, within 48 hours car had been assessed and costs approved (£1500) A week later the car went into the bodyshop for three days.

Whilst driving home after collecting the car from being repaired I got a phone call from my insurer, the other party is claiming that we were both reversing at the same time and their insurer is offering 50/50 - to which I told them where to go.

I’ve since provided a full breakdown of the event with pictures from the day and google maps to illustrate who was where and when.
There is no dash camera footage, there is very likely CCTV from adjacent shops and council cameras which I have told my insurer about.
I was driving with my partner in the car, the other driver had what I assume to be their teenage daughter in their car.
My partner’s 29 year old son and his friend witnessed the whole incident as we had met them to drop something off and they were still loading their car up.

Based on conversations with my insurer (L&V) I have a sinking feeling that I’m going to get shafted on this, in the event this happens is there any merit in following up outside of insurance, for example small claims court to reclaim excess?
Your problem is that on a small claim, your insurer has very little incentive to defend it for saving £750, which would be far less than the costs involved.


Get a dash cam?

lyonspride

2,978 posts

184 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
3rd party probably hasn't changed their mind, their insurance company is pushing 50/50, it's standard, they pretty much all do it.

Dixy

3,646 posts

234 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Do you have the other drivers contact details, if it is in dead their insurers that are being disingenuous they may be unaware and may do the honourable thing. If not you are fked.

hutchst

3,727 posts

125 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Don't policies recommend not admitting liability at the scene?

hunton69

674 posts

166 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Could get worse if they put a claim in for say 2 grand repairs and whiplash as your insurance will have to fork out 50% of their claim.
Dash dash cam the only way to go

akirk

5,778 posts

143 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
caziques said:
If you were moving then your vehicle would be scraped rather than just damaged.

Photos would show one way or the other.
This - if you were stationary - then their damage would be on one point of your car...
If you were moving then the damage area would have 'moved'

should be easy to have seen in the photos...

xjay1337

15,966 posts

147 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
So frustrating.

I think the reason insurance companies do this is because if it's 50/50 then the actual cost to them is less IE they don't have to pay out for both
It would not surprise me if some co-ercing goes on with the insurance advisor and the client.

meatballs

1,140 posts

89 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
The insurance companies won't care but if I was feeling anal and aggrieved I'd push a small claims court on them for damages caused due to their fraudulent claims. Might change their tune. Then again probably difficult to actually push it through without an independent witness or footage. furious

98elise

32,572 posts

190 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
As they reversed into you it's safe to say they didn't see you. If they didn't see you how can they know you were reversing.

ging84

9,548 posts

175 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
98elise said:
As they reversed into you it's safe to say they didn't see you. If they didn't see you how can they know you were reversing.
Exactly the argument the insurer will have used to convince them to believe it might not have been all their fault

Oldandslow

2,405 posts

235 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
Sadly just normal business. Circumstances not clear cut enough, nobody is going full CSI to investigate damage patterns or hunt for CCTV. Insurance companies will go for quick resolution rather than fight a claim that'll cost them more to fight than they win, IF they win. All I would suggest is try to get CCTV before it's gone. Might be worth your time if not an insurance investigators.

KungFuPanda

4,639 posts

199 months

Monday 15th July 2019
quotequote all
meatballs said:
The insurance companies won't care but if I was feeling anal and aggrieved I'd push a small claims court on them for damages caused due to their fraudulent claims. Might change their tune. Then again probably difficult to actually push it through without an independent witness or footage. furious
Ehhhh?

meatballs

1,140 posts

89 months

Tuesday 16th July 2019
quotequote all
KungFuPanda said:
Ehhhh?
Just because the insurance companies won't do anything doesn't mean you cant push a civil case for the damages caused by a third party. It's completely impractical to actually do in the circumstances but a letter is almost free.

Helicopter123

8,831 posts

185 months

Wednesday 17th July 2019
quotequote all
meatballs said:
KungFuPanda said:
Ehhhh?
Just because the insurance companies won't do anything doesn't mean you cant push a civil case for the damages caused by a third party. It's completely impractical to actually do in the circumstances but a letter is almost free.
Who is the OP pursuing? His own insurance company?

vitesse2000

369 posts

192 months

Wednesday 17th July 2019
quotequote all
I had a minicab driver in a rush to get past on the inside, hit my old Vauxhall up the arse in about 1980, did very little to mine but wing, bonnet, lights on OS to his. My insurers told him to swivel, but he took me to small claims with the story I reversed into him at high speed (no I wasn’t for those who like to argue) - he was in his 50s, I was 21, the court believed him and I was not far off a grand out of pocket.

Definitely worth a small claims punt if the insurer won’t - if you win you might even have grounds for your no claims to be reinstated