ALF are not ALF enough.
Discussion
https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/15/monkeys-scream-pain...
I reckon that if u can get access to people involved in this sort of thing you have a moral obligation to take action to a point where you not only abhor others but take action to the point where you abhor and traumatise yourself.
I reckon that if u can get access to people involved in this sort of thing you have a moral obligation to take action to a point where you not only abhor others but take action to the point where you abhor and traumatise yourself.
Tannedbaldhead said:
https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/15/monkeys-scream-pain...
I reckon that if u can get access to people involved in this sort of thing you have a moral obligation to take action to a point where you not only abhor others but take action to the point where you abhor and traumatise yourself.
Speechless. I reckon that if u can get access to people involved in this sort of thing you have a moral obligation to take action to a point where you not only abhor others but take action to the point where you abhor and traumatise yourself.
The monkeys are being handled so as to minimise the risk of bites, scratches etc. It isn't pleasant to watch, any more than it is to do, but it's being done because the law requires it.
Testing on simians is expensive and tightly regulated, it doesn't happen without a good reason.
The rules around the use of dogs and cats are only slightly less stringent - and most of the animals shown look healthy and reasonably happy.
TBH, both you and the ALF are (ironically) barking up the wrong tree. If you really want an end to in-vivo testing, lobby for changes in the law. Because drug companies are not staffed by mini-Mengeles trying to cause as much suffering per furry victim as possible, they're complying with the legislation passed by Governments of all stripes over the last several decades. Furthermore, because of the cost, bureaucracy and trauma of animal testing, they've also been very active in developing alternatives and pressing for their use.
If this lab has been causing unnecessary suffering the law will come down on it and its employees like the proverbial tonne of bricks, if not, this story will go the way of so many other 'scandals' over the years.
Either way, no-one needs ill-informed keyboard vigilantes or actual terrorists threatening people's lives.
Testing on simians is expensive and tightly regulated, it doesn't happen without a good reason.
The rules around the use of dogs and cats are only slightly less stringent - and most of the animals shown look healthy and reasonably happy.
TBH, both you and the ALF are (ironically) barking up the wrong tree. If you really want an end to in-vivo testing, lobby for changes in the law. Because drug companies are not staffed by mini-Mengeles trying to cause as much suffering per furry victim as possible, they're complying with the legislation passed by Governments of all stripes over the last several decades. Furthermore, because of the cost, bureaucracy and trauma of animal testing, they've also been very active in developing alternatives and pressing for their use.
If this lab has been causing unnecessary suffering the law will come down on it and its employees like the proverbial tonne of bricks, if not, this story will go the way of so many other 'scandals' over the years.
Either way, no-one needs ill-informed keyboard vigilantes or actual terrorists threatening people's lives.
Edited by handpaper on Tuesday 15th October 21:33
Now I eat animals for food as we humans have always done.
OK I don't chase and hunt/kill them myself nowadays, Tescos, or the farmer does it.
But, that looks completely unacceptable. I wonder what they are testing and for whom?
I doubt Max Factor, Mcdonalds or anyone of a similar ilk would want to have any links with that.
Imagine the publicity s
t storm coming someones way very soon.
Interesting cross post with handpaper and a sensible point made.
OK I don't chase and hunt/kill them myself nowadays, Tescos, or the farmer does it.
But, that looks completely unacceptable. I wonder what they are testing and for whom?
I doubt Max Factor, Mcdonalds or anyone of a similar ilk would want to have any links with that.
Imagine the publicity s
t storm coming someones way very soon. Interesting cross post with handpaper and a sensible point made.
handpaper said:
The rules around the use of dogs and cats are only slightly less stringent - and most of the animals shown look healthy and reasonably happy.
Happy? Really? Lying in their own blood and crying out having chemicals forced down their throats? Edited by handpaper on Tuesday 15th October 21:33
You,re either watching a different video or need to go to Specsavers.
peterperkins said:
But, that looks completely unacceptable. I wonder what they are testing and for whom?
I doubt Max Factor, Mcdonalds or anyone of a similar ilk would want to have any links with that.
As per the article "pharmaceutical, industrial and agro-chemical companies", so not cosmetics or food companies. I doubt Max Factor, Mcdonalds or anyone of a similar ilk would want to have any links with that.
Newky Brown said:
handpaper said:
The rules around the use of dogs and cats are only slightly less stringent - and most of the animals shown look healthy and reasonably happy.
Happy? Really? Lying in their own blood and crying out having chemicals forced down their throats? Edited by handpaper on Tuesday 15th October 21:33
You,re either watching a different video or need to go to Specsavers.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff