Barack Obama says ‘politically woke’ should get over themsel
Discussion
Barack Obama says ‘politically woke’ should get over themselves: https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/barac...
Same story, different outlet: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50239261
This is interesting. Woke is (I believe) more a "left" thing and many people took great delight in covfefe and hamberders, after losing the un-losable election. Will the democrats learn this time 'round?
Same story, different outlet: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50239261
This is interesting. Woke is (I believe) more a "left" thing and many people took great delight in covfefe and hamberders, after losing the un-losable election. Will the democrats learn this time 'round?
Countdown said:
R Mutt said:
Valid especially from the perspective that wokeness largely revolves around enforcing your moral superiority by calling out others.
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling out others. Dickish behaviour deserves to be called out.It's just a religion under a different name, with 'wokeness' replacing piety. Pathetic really.
Edited by Mark Benson on Thursday 31st October 11:26
Countdown said:
I don't think there's anything wrong with calling out others. Dickish behaviour deserves to be called out.
I'm sure the language of how not to be a dick is pretty universal but you can't call out the unwoke any more than you can call out a foreigner for not understanding your culture whereas the woke make their own rules so you will always lose.R Mutt said:
Valid especially from the perspective that wokeness largely revolves around enforcing your moral superiority by calling out others.
I've been reading up on (I think it was) kierkegaard's theory that placing disadvantaged groups on a pedestal (in this context he was referring to refugees) is dumb. The sad truth is that minorities and disadvantaged groups have had to live through experiences that will almost certainly make them worse human beings. Taking the 'woke' stance that we should check our privilege and protect these groups is totally the wrong way to approach the issue. Hopefully 'Woke' and Cancel Culture are just a fashionable passing fad.
Digga said:
amusingduck said:
I'd rather they get woke to China, rather than getting over themselves.
Agreed.If the XR crash test dummies really wanted to go somewhere and make a worthwhile impact (and GTF out of our hair) then that's it.

Fittster said:
Don't understand the point he's making.
If someone is being racist should they not be pulled up on their views?
If someone has previously posted homophobic views online, should they be overlooked because they happened in the past?
I took his point to be that a) that's all people do and it won't change things. And b) that people are not all good or all bad - 'binary' thinking.If someone is being racist should they not be pulled up on their views?
If someone has previously posted homophobic views online, should they be overlooked because they happened in the past?
Eta, all some people do.....
Edited by Sticks. on Thursday 31st October 11:58
Countdown said:
KarlMac said:
The sad truth is that minorities and disadvantaged groups have had to live through experiences that will almost certainly make them worse human beings.

How does being a minority or disadvantaged make somebody a worse human being?
The privilege here, is ironically the one whereby you are in the position to focus on those worse off. A very middle class trait.
R Mutt said:
Countdown said:
KarlMac said:
The sad truth is that minorities and disadvantaged groups have had to live through experiences that will almost certainly make them worse human beings.

How does being a minority or disadvantaged make somebody a worse human being?
The privilege here, is ironically the one whereby you are in the position to focus on those worse off. A very middle class trait.
Countdown said:
R Mutt said:
Countdown said:
KarlMac said:
The sad truth is that minorities and disadvantaged groups have had to live through experiences that will almost certainly make them worse human beings.

How does being a minority or disadvantaged make somebody a worse human being?
The privilege here, is ironically the one whereby you are in the position to focus on those worse off. A very middle class trait.
In short a Syrian refugee doesn't give a f
k about your gender pronouns.Edited by R Mutt on Thursday 31st October 12:47
Fittster said:
Don't understand the point he's making.
If someone is being racist should they not be pulled up on their views?
If someone has previously posted homophobic views online, should they be overlooked because they happened in the past?
His point seems to be more that someone shouldn't be called racist and homophobic simply because they do not follow the latest wording or be aware of all the latest issues. Also that people are neither wholly good or bad and they might have some old fashioned views in some areas but that doesn't mean they need to frantically denounced. If someone is being racist should they not be pulled up on their views?
If someone has previously posted homophobic views online, should they be overlooked because they happened in the past?
The big problem that I think that left wing politicians/media have as a result of "woke" culture is that the lose sight of how most of the population think. They talk in an echo chamber and their assumptions diverge from the rest of the population to the extent that some with what would be considered liberal views a few decades ago suddenly find themselves "no platformed" and/or denounced as "alt-right" by the woke. With their philosophy of you are either with us on all aspects or against us they drive away many potential sympathises.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


