Trouble with Insurance
Trouble with Insurance
Author
Discussion

NeilBPrater

Original Poster:

1,452 posts

283 months

Sunday 29th September 2002
quotequote all
My Insurance company has decided to cancel my insurance on my 98 Chimaera because I did not send proof of a Thatcham 1 alarm and immobilizer being fitted. I told them that these were factory fitted as standard, to which I got the reply, no they were not!
I have definitely got a factory alarm and immobilizer as it is in the Chimaera user manual how to operate them. Are these not Thatcham approved, or is this insurance bloke talking bo$%ox?

plotloss

67,280 posts

292 months

Sunday 29th September 2002
quotequote all
If its a Meta alarm thats installed in your motor, then it most definately is Thatcham Cat 1.

Matt.

Jason F

1,183 posts

306 months

Sunday 29th September 2002
quotequote all
Depends on the year of manufacture I think. Contact the factory and they can tell you which you should have, and hopefully they would also supply that in writing. My 94L factory alarm is not a Cat 1 ANYMORE.

NeilBPrater

Original Poster:

1,452 posts

283 months

Sunday 29th September 2002
quotequote all
Yep, meta alarm and immobiliser installed. Am going to fax them the relevant page in the user manual.

bilton_d

605 posts

288 months

Sunday 29th September 2002
quotequote all
Alarm systems can be installed to a cat 1 standard but later in their life be removed from the Thatchman rating. This is/can be due to the fact that the maker has to pay each year a licence fee to have it included in the rating once they refuse/stop paying it is no longer classified as cat 1 approved even though nothing has changed with the alarm etc

Jarrett

100 posts

306 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
My Chim 500 was '98 and it came with a meta alarm with a letter from tvr saying that it was thatcham 1 classified (had remote window closing). My Griff 500 ('96) was the same. Ring TVR and ask for a letter confirming the alarm installation. Also ring a decent insurance broker!!!!!

JonRB

79,086 posts

294 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
quote:
Alarm systems can be installed to a cat 1 standard but later in their life be removed from the Thatchman rating. This is/can be due to the fact that the maker has to pay each year a licence fee to have it included in the rating once they refuse/stop paying it is no longer classified as cat 1 approved even though nothing has changed with the alarm etc.
True, but if the alarm was Thatcham Cat 1 at the time of fitting then most insurers will still class it as Cat 1*, but will often ask you to get an Alarm Health Check done to prove that the alarm is still operating correctly. This costs around £35-£40.

(* provided it was dropped from the Thatcham list due to the manufacturer not renewing the license, rather than due to the discovery of a security-related defect)

>> Edited by JonRB on Monday 30th September 08:50

IPAddis

2,494 posts

306 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
As far as I can remember, the Meta system as fitted to the Griffith/Chimaera is Thatcham cat 1 approved only as long as it is fitted with bonnet/boot pin switched. As TVR use those inputs to connect the ultrasonics/radar detector, it is technically Cat 2.

I'm pretty sure that's what the TVR letter explains.

actech

693 posts

289 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
If it is a Thatcham 1 alarm and was fitted by TVR (or 1st dealer) then you should have an installation certificate that came with the car as proof of alarm type and fitting.

I had the same trouble with my insurance company (Direct Line) and after 3 months of correspondence them trying various solutions wrote to Lotus for a copy of the original certificate. Lotus sent me a copy of the original with an official stamp. So I'd suggest you give that route a try.

BTW Direct Line said that until I sent them the proof I would only be third party insured, once I had sorted out the Alarm mularkey I wrote them another letter asking for a rebate because I had actually paid for a fully comp policy and wanted three months compensation. They refused! B'stards!

JonRB

79,086 posts

294 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
I have a letter from TVR that came with my car saying that all TVRs built after 1999 have a combination of Meta products that, together, are Thatcham Category 1.

My insurers seem to have accepted this, which frankly came as a bit of a surprise on account of the fact my TVR was built in 1997.

neilbprater

Original Poster:

1,452 posts

283 months

Monday 30th September 2002
quotequote all
quote:

BTW Direct Line said that until I sent them the proof I would only be third party insured, once I had sorted out the Alarm mularkey I wrote them another letter asking for a rebate because I had actually paid for a fully comp policy and wanted three months compensation. They refused! B'stards!



Typical insurance company mentality! I assume third party means fire and theft, therefore they would pay up if your car was nicked, but not having a Cat 1 immobiliser precludes you from claiming if you stack your own motor, theres logic!!!!

neilbprater

Original Poster:

1,452 posts

283 months

Wednesday 2nd October 2002
quotequote all
Further to my last post. The insurance company did not accept that an alarm and immobiliser were fitted even though I faxed them the relevant pages in the manual.
They said they wanted a letter from the TVR factory that this had been done. In the mean time they would take my money but, I would not be covered if the car was stolen!!!!
I told them politely to p!%s off and got insured through Pearts, cheaper, trackday cover, less excess and includes breakdown cover.