Novlett Robyn Williams
Discussion
She is the author of her own demise.
She's a professional police officer and knows exactly what she should have done but didn't do it.
I was once in a conversation with a close relative who revealed that a few days earlier he'd been interviewed by a nearby serious crime squad about his possible involvement in a drugs supply scenario.
Knowing the implications of a close relative being subject to scrutiny in such a case on my job, I contacted my Ch Inspector and laid out the facts to him.
He asked me to send him a quick email with the details and he'd do the necessary.
About 3 weeks later, I was told that there'd been a check with our anti corruption unit by the said crime squad about me. They forwarded a copy of the email to them showing I declared it to the force and that was the end of it.
That's all she had to do.
Bearing in mind the sister had committed a criminal offence, Williams knew she had a duty to act and didn't, hence the sentence she received.
She's a professional police officer and knows exactly what she should have done but didn't do it.
I was once in a conversation with a close relative who revealed that a few days earlier he'd been interviewed by a nearby serious crime squad about his possible involvement in a drugs supply scenario.
Knowing the implications of a close relative being subject to scrutiny in such a case on my job, I contacted my Ch Inspector and laid out the facts to him.
He asked me to send him a quick email with the details and he'd do the necessary.
About 3 weeks later, I was told that there'd been a check with our anti corruption unit by the said crime squad about me. They forwarded a copy of the email to them showing I declared it to the force and that was the end of it.
That's all she had to do.
Bearing in mind the sister had committed a criminal offence, Williams knew she had a duty to act and didn't, hence the sentence she received.
There are two tests for a prosecution. The evidential and the public interest tests.
I dare say the first was met for everyone. The latter apparently wasn't. Being a police officer always raises the public interest aspect so there are many potential circumstances where you'll be prosecuted because you're a police officer where a MOP wouldn't.
Top work by her moron sister and her partner.
The superintendent's choice was to either rod her sister and her partner, or not. She chose not to and these are the consequences.
I dare say the first was met for everyone. The latter apparently wasn't. Being a police officer always raises the public interest aspect so there are many potential circumstances where you'll be prosecuted because you're a police officer where a MOP wouldn't.
Top work by her moron sister and her partner.
The superintendent's choice was to either rod her sister and her partner, or not. She chose not to and these are the consequences.
ELUSIVEJIM said:
Think the article says it all.
However, the other 14 who received the same material should be charged as well.
Why's that? If you had been sent the indecent image do you think you should be prosecuted for it? You have very little control over what content is sent to you.However, the other 14 who received the same material should be charged as well.
The Police Officer will be held to a higher standard than the general public due to her position of responsibility.
boyse7en said:
Why's that? If you had been sent the indecent image do you think you should be prosecuted for it? You have very little control over what content is sent to you.
The Police Officer will be held to a higher standard than the general public due to her position of responsibility.
I would imagine normal people would be contacting the police if they received such disturbing footage.The Police Officer will be held to a higher standard than the general public due to her position of responsibility.
Not reporting it should result in prosecution.
hondafanatic said:
Presumably someone from the group did report it and hence it was brought to light? Or was that covered in the article and I've missed it?
it is just odd to send on images etc of such content. Me is would delete it an block them unaware I had broken the law possibly.
k?100 hours of community service for distributing an indecent image of a child?? What on earth?
I'm assuming given its got this far it wasn't something silly like "Here's your toddler niece splashing about on the beach with no top on, thought you'd like to see us all having a lovely holiday"
I'm assuming given its got this far it wasn't something silly like "Here's your toddler niece splashing about on the beach with no top on, thought you'd like to see us all having a lovely holiday"
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff