Mercedes CLS: Good Value for Money?
Mercedes CLS: Good Value for Money?
Author
Discussion

RosscoPColtrane888

Original Poster:

40 posts

91 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
Guys,

Been looking for a motorway mile-muncher and have been looking at the Mercedes Benz CLS. I’d be considering 2015 cars onwards.

Question, why are these cars so cheap? Are they dogs to drive? Are they costly to run/ maintain? The last version was the same. It’s value plummeted.


Thoughts?

Any owners out there with some experience of the car?


Ross

Edited by RosscoPColtrane888 on Tuesday 26th November 21:14

ZX10R NIN

30,523 posts

154 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
They'll do exactly what they you want & they're a good choice as well as a decent steer.

oop north

1,710 posts

157 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
A colleague had a 220cdi saloon. He was rather disappointed with it - he was never quite sure why, though he thought the engine might have played a part

RosscoPColtrane888

Original Poster:

40 posts

91 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
oop north said:
A colleague had a 220cdi saloon. He was rather disappointed with it - he was never quite sure why, though he thought the engine might have played a part
Isn’t that a bit like saying it was the wrong shade of blue...

ZX10R NIN

30,523 posts

154 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
Go for the 350 the four pots are merely adequate.

Phil Dicky

7,194 posts

292 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
Not the most practical.of cars..hence the price. But a very good looking car.

oop north

1,710 posts

157 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
RosscoPColtrane888 said:
Isn’t that a bit like saying it was the wrong shade of blue...
Well, it was grey wink

cerb4.5lee

44,258 posts

209 months

Tuesday 26th November 2019
quotequote all
ZX10R NIN said:
Go for the 350 the four pots are merely adequate.
This.

AlBondigaz

227 posts

96 months

Wednesday 27th November 2019
quotequote all
I had a CLS 350d Shooting Break for 12 months and 14,000 miles. Av 37 mpg would do mid 40’s on a run.

Basically an E class Merc but with nicer trim. A nice place to eat away at the miles. Standard Merc prices for service - fixed plan is £39 a month. 12 month intervals or 15,500 miles.

You only get 4 seats in the Saloon and you can’t put a tow-bar on them. The shooting Break is pretty practical as a full 5 seater with decent load space but small doors and low roofline a bit of hassle if you are 6ft plus.

The Intelligent Light System is well worth having. Look for Premium or Prem. Plus spec. Driving Assistance Package is rare to find but a real good option.

Targarama

14,780 posts

312 months

Wednesday 27th November 2019
quotequote all
Don't get AMG spec with stupid wheels and it will be perfect for the use intended. I had a CLS 350 petrol on 18 inch wheels, super comfy and loved it. Most seem to be diesel now, 4 cylinders are a little rough for this car IMO.

anonymous-user

83 months

Wednesday 27th November 2019
quotequote all
I've had a 2017 CLS 220d Shooting Brake for about 14 months now. In short, yes, they're good value and a great motorway mile muncher.

I think they just aren't on many people's radar used so perhaps hang around for a bit. I was looking for a replacement for an E Class estate and hadn't considered one until I saw it on the local dealer forecourt - it was a similar price to an E estate of the same age and mileage, despite the original list being considerably greater and being nicer inside IMO. I think they are overpriced at full list however.

As said above, basically drives like a slightly tauter E Class, servicing is similar to an E Class, no horror stories AFAIK. Shooting Brake gets you a surprisingly capacious boot, rear self-levelling air suspension and 3 seats in the back - though putting a child seat and occupant in is a real pain due to the lower sloping roofline.

Mine is a premium so has lots of nice things I find useful - the amazing Intelligent Lighting System, electric tilt/slide sunroof, memory seats/mirrors/headrests, COMAND (sat nav, can play music on spotify via bluetooth etc).

Don't buy the 220d. Or the 250d for that matter. Honestly they are actually fine, get 45-55mpg, you can make good progress, overtake safely, they're not even that noisy in my opinion, but you'll always wish you had an extra 2 cylinders - I do. I think the 6 cylinder cars also got the newer 9 speed autobox sooner than the 4 cylinder cars which had the 7G+.


Sir Bagalot

7,075 posts

210 months

Wednesday 27th November 2019
quotequote all
Do you find the steering wheel offset in these?

I tried a SB in 2016. Sat in it. Adjusted the seat. Adjusted the steering wheel. Got out. Simply couldn't live with the positioning of the wheel

ninjag

1,878 posts

148 months

Wednesday 27th November 2019
quotequote all
I had an almost brand new one as a courtesy car and didn't like it. It was the four cylinder diesel and had dangerous levels of turbo lag in my opinion. Interior was nice but squeaked and rattled, the rear sensor thing in the roof had fallen out as well and I had try and jam it back in. It was the AMG version and very firm, this may have been the cause behind a lot of the interior issues.

anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 28th November 2019
quotequote all
Yep, the ride in the AMG line (or whatever its called) with the 19 inch wheels is firm around town, and mine does have a few minor squeaks and rattles from the A pillars and dash, which vary dependent on ambient temperature.

I dont feel there's any 'turbo lag', not that I would term it dangerous if there was. The engine and 'box combo is used in C, E, CLS etc and I've never heard anyone say that. I've heard some say its sluggish to pull off from a standstill but that's as in standard mode the 7G box pulls away in 2nd, simply drive in sport, or use the paddles to blip down into 1st.


RosscoPColtrane888

Original Poster:

40 posts

91 months

Saturday 30th November 2019
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
I've had a 2017 CLS 220d Shooting Brake for about 14 months now. In short, yes, they're good value and a great motorway mile muncher.

I think they just aren't on many people's radar used so perhaps hang around for a bit. I was looking for a replacement for an E Class estate and hadn't considered one until I saw it on the local dealer forecourt - it was a similar price to an E estate of the same age and mileage, despite the original list being considerably greater and being nicer inside IMO. I think they are overpriced at full list however.

As said above, basically drives like a slightly tauter E Class, servicing is similar to an E Class, no horror stories AFAIK. Shooting Brake gets you a surprisingly capacious boot, rear self-levelling air suspension and 3 seats in the back - though putting a child seat and occupant in is a real pain due to the lower sloping roofline.

Mine is a premium so has lots of nice things I find useful - the amazing Intelligent Lighting System, electric tilt/slide sunroof, memory seats/mirrors/headrests, COMAND (sat nav, can play music on spotify via bluetooth etc).

Don't buy the 220d. Or the 250d for that matter. Honestly they are actually fine, get 45-55mpg, you can make good progress, overtake safely, they're not even that noisy in my opinion, but you'll always wish you had an extra 2 cylinders - I do. I think the 6 cylinder cars also got the newer 9 speed autobox sooner than the 4 cylinder cars which had the 7G+.
Excellent advice. Very helpful indeed.

Wacky Racer

41,244 posts

276 months

Saturday 30th November 2019
quotequote all
I has a 3.0 diesel from new in 2007. Lovely car.

Can be bought for peanuts now.

Headroom a bit poor in the back though.

talksthetorque

10,821 posts

164 months

Saturday 30th November 2019
quotequote all
Think it's the poor rear headroom which means that you're knocking families with bigger sprogs and executive taxi buyers out of the second hand market.
Conversely, it could be the demand for the E class as Taxis that is driving the comparative price of them up.
Always liked them - never knew quite why.

Sheepshanks

40,874 posts

148 months

Saturday 30th November 2019
quotequote all
yellowbentines said:
Don't buy the 220d. Or the 250d for that matter. Honestly they are actually fine, get 45-55mpg, you can make good progress, overtake safely, they're not even that noisy in my opinion, but you'll always wish you had an extra 2 cylinders - I do. I think the 6 cylinder cars also got the newer 9 speed autobox sooner than the 4 cylinder cars which had the 7G+.
A couple of years ago I got a new E Class courtesy car which I was convinced said 250CDi on the paperwork. I'd read the 250CDi could be a bit harsh and I could feel it was a bit, but thought it wasn't bad. Was so gobsmacked to see it had 350 on the boot when I got home I had to open the bonnet and check it really was the V6.