Honda Civic - newer high miles facelift vs. older low miles?
Discussion
Hi all - Looking at picking up a Honda Civic (1.8 petrol / manual). I have narrowed it down to 2 locally and would appreciate your input...
1. 2015 Feb (facelifted) 1.8 SR 80000 miles - 1 owner full Honda history up @ £7.5K at local garage (3 month RAC warranty)
vs.
2. 2014 March (pre facelift) 1.8 EX GT 40000 miles - 2 owner full Honda History up @ £9K at Honda dealer (1 year Honda warranty)
It seems to me the newer facelifted one makes more sense despite the higher miles? We buy any car puts them both at @ £1K over on sticker price.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Cheers.
1. 2015 Feb (facelifted) 1.8 SR 80000 miles - 1 owner full Honda history up @ £7.5K at local garage (3 month RAC warranty)
vs.
2. 2014 March (pre facelift) 1.8 EX GT 40000 miles - 2 owner full Honda History up @ £9K at Honda dealer (1 year Honda warranty)
It seems to me the newer facelifted one makes more sense despite the higher miles? We buy any car puts them both at @ £1K over on sticker price.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Cheers.
Newer one if it was me OP, 80k isn't high mileage what so ever, I would always go newer car over mileage.
If it is what you want to pay/budget + nice having facelift, will make you keep it longer as it will age better.
Same as usual, mileage doesn't = a bad car, always buy on condition, I stopped getting hung up about mileage years ago, quite late liberating and activity look for above average miles nowadays.
Just take into account it will be worth less if you decide to sell it later.
If it is what you want to pay/budget + nice having facelift, will make you keep it longer as it will age better.
Same as usual, mileage doesn't = a bad car, always buy on condition, I stopped getting hung up about mileage years ago, quite late liberating and activity look for above average miles nowadays.
Just take into account it will be worth less if you decide to sell it later.
Gassing Station | Car Buying | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


