Has a US E-11A been shot down?
Has a US E-11A been shot down?
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

DuraAce

4,272 posts

184 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Technical failure forcing emergency landing? It's a mess either way but maybe a missile would have caused it to break up in the air similar to events in Iran the other week?

Fuselage looks reasonably intact to me, albeit consumed by fire. Slim odds of the crew waking away though, fingers crossed for them that they aren't guests of the taliban if they did get out....

Edited by DuraAce on Monday 27th January 13:38

drdino

1,274 posts

166 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Yeap, looks like it's 11-9358. frown

Trevatanus

11,349 posts

174 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Possible it could have been damaged after landing to avoid the tech getting in the wrong hands?

Krikkit

27,841 posts

205 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Trevatanus said:
Possible it could have been damaged after landing to avoid the tech getting in the wrong hands?
If it was a controlled or semi-controlled landing then that seems like a sensible explanation - the fire looks like it was internal burning out rather than what you'd expect of outside burning in... Hope the crew's OK.

strath44

1,368 posts

172 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Trevatanus said:
Possible it could have been damaged after landing to avoid the tech getting in the wrong hands?
Going by other outlets and what can be seen its looks highly likely it was a controlled landing followed by the use of on board incendiaries to destroy anything of interest!

have a look at this

http://avherald.com/h?article=4d282570&opt=256

Crumpet

5,044 posts

204 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Trevatanus said:
Possible it could have been damaged after landing to avoid the tech getting in the wrong hands?
They’ve managed to remove a wing while they were at it! Wonder where that’s ended up?

As someone who flies the Global Express, albeit in a slightly less exciting role, a technical failure would be rather concerning.

strath44

1,368 posts

172 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Crumpet said:
They’ve managed to remove a wing while they were at it! Wonder where that’s ended up?

As someone who flies the Global Express, albeit in a slightly less exciting role, a technical failure would be rather concerning.
I noticed that as well but there is another photo and its hard to distinguish as it may be snow but it looks like the wing is a short distance away!

red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
I read about the passenger plane and then just browsing saw reports of the E11 down. Terrible visibility too which will not help with SAR. I suspect the gentlemen from the Virginia Beach QRF are already on the ground. Good luck to them!


red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
Reports on one of the military forums they (pilots) were in contact with ATC for a short time and did declare an emergency at a considerable altitude and requested lower but then went NORDO. Probably on other secure radio channels from that point on.

red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
Reports via AFP saying Michael DAndrea aka "Roger" was on board. This is one of the top agency guys and is massive news if true. He was head of CIA CT ops for almost 10 years. A direct graduate of "the farm" and has been in post as 38 years.... will be very big if true. (edit to add the sources who state this are not from the USA so take with pinch of salt!)

Edited by red_slr on Tuesday 28th January 14:04

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
Dual engine failure or hit by something? Taliban saying they shot it down.

red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
No one knows other than they did declare an emergency and asked for FL350. From the photos online all we can tell is it has managed to "land" but lost both wings in the process after hitting a large ditch. Looks like the APU was running which is a sign that perhaps they did not have engines to generate power but again we don't really know.

Hopefully it was a long drawn out glide down meaning they could get people in position - or as near as possible.

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
red_slr said:
No one knows other than they did declare an emergency and asked for FL350. From the photos online all we can tell is it has managed to "land" but lost both wings in the process after hitting a large ditch. Looks like the APU was running which is a sign that perhaps they did not have engines to generate power but again we don't really know.

Hopefully it was a long drawn out glide down meaning they could get people in position - or as near as possible.
TBF, I expect plenty of people will know what happened.

red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
Well of course, I suspect they went NORDO for security reasons and also to give full situation update.

This could well be the most expensive loss of an aircraft since the B2 crash.

Yertis

19,562 posts

290 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Well of course, I suspect they went NORDO for security reasons and also to give full situation update.

This could well be the most expensive loss of an aircraft since the B2 crash.
For the benefit of Eric in particular: In North American aviation, a NORDO aircraft is an aircraft flying without a radio.

New one on me anyway biggrin

Crumpet

5,044 posts

204 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Hopefully it was a long drawn out glide down meaning they could get people in position - or as near as possible.
Even from FL350 they’d have roughly twenty minutes. And approximately 80 miles to run. Although the terrain / elevation could quite easily cut five minutes and many miles off that!

Interestingly there is a checklist that calls specifically for FL350 max. Although there’s no reason you’d need to put it down in a field because of it....

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

78 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
Yertis said:
red_slr said:
Well of course, I suspect they went NORDO for security reasons and also to give full situation update.

This could well be the most expensive loss of an aircraft since the B2 crash.
For the benefit of Eric in particular: In North American aviation, a NORDO aircraft is an aircraft flying without a radio.

New one on me anyway biggrin
And me.

eharding

14,648 posts

308 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:
Yertis said:
red_slr said:
Well of course, I suspect they went NORDO for security reasons and also to give full situation update.

This could well be the most expensive loss of an aircraft since the B2 crash.
For the benefit of Eric in particular: In North American aviation, a NORDO aircraft is an aircraft flying without a radio.

New one on me anyway biggrin
And me.
Or me. Rather ironic to describe an E-11 as "an aircraft flying without a radio".

If I'm talking to an ATSU and then QSY so that someone listening in can't hear me any more, am I NORDO? Or have I just poked off to a different frequency? And if my wingman goes off to the wrong frequency and we can't talk to each other, are we both NORDO, or just the one on the wrong frequency? Or only if one of us forgot to write down the collector?

On a more sombre note, the state of the front of that aircraft in the video doesn't bode well frown

Edited by eharding on Tuesday 28th January 15:21

red_slr

20,066 posts

213 months

Tuesday 28th January 2020
quotequote all
USAF issued a statement saying 2 bodies have been recovered and there was no one else onboard.
The FDR has been recovered.