Most anti-business Tory party?
Author
Discussion

Tuna

Original Poster:

19,930 posts

308 months

Monday 2nd March 2020
quotequote all
All the stuff over IR-35, now talk of reducing or removing entrepreneurs tax relief... it comes to something when the Labour part appear more supportive of business than the Conservatives.

Jasandjules

72,035 posts

253 months

Monday 2nd March 2020
quotequote all
Not to mention taxing dividends. Disgraceful really.

Murph7355

40,984 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Tuna said:
All the stuff over IR-35, now talk of reducing or removing entrepreneurs tax relief... it comes to something when the Labour part appear more supportive of business than the Conservatives.
I'm not sure those two examples are necessarily "anti-business" Tuna.

IR35 has been a dog's dinner for 20yrs. This govt are just doubling down on it (well, the last govt really. These just haven't stopped it). It'll backfire and will find its level.

Entrepreneurs tax relief isn't exactly about keeping your business going smile

Don't get me wrong, I wish they'd stop messing about on the fringes. But that's all they really have to play with.

JagLover

46,221 posts

259 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
Tuna said:
All the stuff over IR-35, now talk of reducing or removing entrepreneurs tax relief... it comes to something when the Labour part appear more supportive of business than the Conservatives.
I'm not sure those two examples are necessarily "anti-business" Tuna.

IR35 has been a dog's dinner for 20yrs. This govt are just doubling down on it (well, the last govt really. These just haven't stopped it). It'll backfire and will find its level.

Entrepreneurs tax relief isn't exactly about keeping your business going smile

Don't get me wrong, I wish they'd stop messing about on the fringes. But that's all they really have to play with.
Fully agree

They are both to do with the technicalities of tax. IR35 is a measure against disguised employment so has nothing whatsoever to do with "business" in my opinion. People who would have been employees a generation ago now show up, work a 9-5, fill in a timesheet, and expect to be treated as if they are the next Richard Branson.

Entrepreneurs relief has long been abused for profit extraction (as I well know working in practice). There will always need to be a balance between encouraging risk taking through the tax system and making sure people pay their fair share of tax.

powerstroke

10,283 posts

184 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Sadly seems to be anti SME enterprise with the ongoing attack on many fronts including contractors and BTL
to be fair most people in small business see the Tories as the least worst option but their real DNA is the wants and needs of big business and old money, he who pays the piper and all that ..
to be fair there is a lot of bogus self employment where people are just working for one "customer" filling permanent roles
thinking of a certain plumbing firm !! , the acid test should be do you pick your work ,your customers and your availability,
should be able to show more than one customer or another contract in the pipeline for a different customer and be have invoices to prove you work a contract and move on to the next !!

CzechItOut

2,156 posts

215 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Did I dream this or have they announced the scrapping of the planned reduction in Corporation Tax?

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
CzechItOut said:
Did I dream this or have they announced the scrapping of the planned reduction in Corporation Tax?
No you didn't dream it.

Boris announced that gem in the run up to the GE.

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
powerstroke said:
Sadly seems to be anti SME enterprise with the ongoing attack on many fronts including contractors and BTL
to be fair most people in small business see the Tories as the least worst option but their real DNA is the wants and needs of big business and old money, he who pays the piper and all that ..
to be fair there is a lot of bogus self employment where people are just working for one "customer" filling permanent roles
thinking of a certain plumbing firm !! , the acid test should be do you pick your work ,your customers and your availability,
should be able to show more than one customer or another contract in the pipeline for a different customer and be have invoices to prove you work a contract and move on to the next !!
Farage has a personal services company to avoid taxation.

bitchstewie

64,412 posts

234 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Who was it that said "fk business"? scratchchin

I'm not an expert on business.

I'd say a fairly simple test is ask what you'd think of the policy if it was announced by someone else i.e. Corbyn or McDonnell.

If you'd think "Nice one Jezza" be honest and say so.

But if you think "What a turd of a policy" be honest too and don't defend it just because the person announcing it is on your team.

Eric Mc

124,992 posts

289 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
The notion that the Conservatives are "pro-business" or "pro-defence" is rather ancient history now.

They are pretty much "pro whatever they think goes down well with their voter base" - as are most parties.

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The notion that the Conservatives are "pro-business" or "pro-defence" is rather ancient history now.

They are pretty much "pro whatever they think goes down well with their voter base" - as are most parties.
And they are actively in the process of trying to steal the Labour voter base.

Eric Mc

124,992 posts

289 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Stay in Bed Instead said:
And they are actively in the process of trying to steal the Labour voter base.
Looks like it - and they may be succeeding.

Murph7355

40,984 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
JagLover said:
... There will always need to be a balance between encouraging risk taking through the tax system and making sure people pay their fair share of tax.
Million dollar question that effectively underpins differing political ideologies is... "what is a fair share?".

Answers on a postcard smile

powerstroke said:
.... , the acid test should be do you pick your work ,your customers and your availability,
should be able to show more than one customer or another contract in the pipeline for a different customer and be have invoices to prove you work a contract and move on to the next !!
The reason the legislation is so flawed is that the govt have also tried to tackle it as you are suggesting. Life is simply more nuanced than that.

Not one of the acid tests you note couldn't be "played" or have serious unintended consequences. For example in quelling the number of startups - certainly in the services industry.

We have to go back to basics and think carefully about what the real objectives are.

If it's tax intake then I suspect GO's approach on that was in the right direction - cut the holes that are there to be leveraged. Eg dividend taxation. (I'd also scrub the charade that is NI and add it to income tax and Corporation Tax - if we must. Another bs tax - to balance it out). But in doing so, make sure you aren't causing other issues (eg people being less inclined to invest in companies).

If it's about staff welfare (seriously doubtful it ever has been) then there are different levers to pull depending on whether you prefer big or small govt.

The problem is that all thinking on these and other policy areas, but especially taxation, is too one dimensional. This might be OK if we were really clear on our objectives and the priority of them. But we aren't. So the thinking is confused and the outcomes even worse.

Piha

7,150 posts

116 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
LOL at those tory supporters that didn't consider that all those promises would have to be paid for..... Magic money tree anyone?

Mrr T

14,922 posts

289 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
(I'd also scrub the charade that is NI and add it to income tax and Corporation Tax - if we must. Another bs tax - to balance it out)

While I agree NI is just another tax. I read an article on changing it and it's not easy from a systems or political perspective.

A lot of benefits are linked to NI. The most obvious is pensions. Amalgamation of NI into other taxes requires not only a rewrite of a lot of benefits legislation but also rewriting the underlying benefits systems.

NI also has a political advantage in the employer's contribution are a hidden tax which no one thinks of as real tax.

Stay in Bed Instead

22,362 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Pensions are not subject to NI too.

Gecko1978

12,302 posts

181 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Mrr T said:
Murph7355 said:
(I'd also scrub the charade that is NI and add it to income tax and Corporation Tax - if we must. Another bs tax - to balance it out)

While I agree NI is just another tax. I read an article on changing it and it's not easy from a systems or political perspective.

A lot of benefits are linked to NI. The most obvious is pensions. Amalgamation of NI into other taxes requires not only a rewrite of a lot of benefits legislation but also rewriting the underlying benefits systems.

NI also has a political advantage in the employer's contribution are a hidden tax which no one thinks of as real tax.
Given firms are passing all NI into their contractors while not giving them employment rights I would say its less hidden now lol.

But things must be paid for so today it is what it is tomorrow is a different story.

super7

2,199 posts

232 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
PSC's could have been fixed very easily by HMRC by creating a new class of Ltd company for PSC's and making a minimum director salary and increased Corporation tax to cover the NI bit.

Would have saved a whole load of bad press and st!

Alex

9,978 posts

308 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
The government should start setting policy, instead of allowing the civil service to do it.

Eric Mc

124,992 posts

289 months

Tuesday 3rd March 2020
quotequote all
Mrr T said:
While I agree NI is just another tax. I read an article on changing it and it's not easy from a systems or political perspective.

A lot of benefits are linked to NI. The most obvious is pensions. Amalgamation of NI into other taxes requires not only a rewrite of a lot of benefits legislation but also rewriting the underlying benefits systems.

NI also has a political advantage in the employer's contribution are a hidden tax which no one thinks of as real tax.
The NI system is a real mess. A number of Chancellors have looked at simplifying it but every time they do they realise what a complicated minefield it is and walk away.