Speeding fine penalty less severe than expected
Speeding fine penalty less severe than expected
Author
Discussion

Julian Thompson

Original Poster:

2,715 posts

267 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Friend was flashed at 49 in a 30.

He seemed sure he’d get 3 points and a small fine but I looked it up and expected him to get 6 and an income related penalty as it seemed to be a “band B” offence.

He was right - 3 points £100 fine.

So how fast do you have to go to get into proper trouble?

agtlaw

7,403 posts

235 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
If you “looked it up” properly then a Fixed Penalty was always the most likely outcome.

50/30 = SJPN.

Presumably you read the speeding fines nonsense published by Evo Magazine or similar. If so then the editor is aware that it’s utter nonsense but doesn’t care.

Julian Thompson

Original Poster:

2,715 posts

267 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Haha thanks for that - I googled it. Can’t remember the source but it looked “official”!

Presume that over 50 it gets worse?

BertBert

21,262 posts

240 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Julian Thompson said:
Presume that over 50 it gets worse?
agtlaw said:
50/30 = SJPN.

redexstyle

38 posts

98 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
I was caught 51 in a 30 and got 6 points and fines totally £800 so I guess anything over 50mph in a 30.

OFORBES

535 posts

129 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Yep. 5 years ago I got caught at 53 in a 30 at midnight, slowing down going into the 30 from a NSL but I didn't slow down enough or in time.

Stopped by an unmarked Audi A6.

I got 6 points and a £1k + court costs fine.

Still to this day I believe that if I had been driving a different car I would not have been stopped. I did slow down to 30, but after a couple of hundred yards as opposed to before the 30 limit sign so it was a fair cop so to speak but still, was pretty annoying.




martinbiz

3,699 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
OFORBES said:
Yep. 5 years ago I got caught at 53 in a 30 at midnight, slowing down going into the 30 from a NSL but I didn't slow down enough or in time.

Stopped by an unmarked Audi A6.

I got 6 points and a £1k + court costs fine.

Still to this day I believe that if I had been driving a different car I would not have been stopped. I did slow down to 30, but after a couple of hundred yards as opposed to before the 30 limit sign so it was a fair cop so to speak but still, was pretty annoying.
I think at 53 in a 30 it wouldn’t make blind bit of difference what you were driving

4rephill

5,167 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
OFORBES said:
Yep. 5 years ago I got caught at 53 in a 30 at midnight, slowing down going into the 30 from a NSL but I didn't slow down enough or in time.

Stopped by an unmarked Audi A6.

I got 6 points and a £1k + court costs fine.

Still to this day I believe that if I had been driving a different car I would not have been stopped. I did slow down to 30, but after a couple of hundred yards as opposed to before the 30 limit sign so it was a fair cop so to speak but still, was pretty annoying.
What car were you driving that makes you think you were being targeted by the police?

OFORBES

535 posts

129 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
I was driving a 911 that I had collected that afternoon.

53 in a 30 is, as I said, a fair cop. The officer who stopped me was nice enough about it, the reason I've always wondered if the outcome would have been different if I had been driving a different car was because he made comment about the car a few times when he had me sat in the back of his patrol car.

I didn't fly all the way through the 30 at over 50 whilst he followed me, I just slowed down too late and obviously was speeding so I deserved what I got.




4rephill

5,167 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
OFORBES said:
I was driving a 911 that I had collected that afternoon.

53 in a 30 is, as I said, a fair cop. The officer who stopped me was nice enough about it, the reason I've always wondered if the outcome would have been different if I had been driving a different car was because he made comment about the car a few times when he had me sat in the back of his patrol car.

I didn't fly all the way through the 30 at over 50 whilst he followed me, I just slowed down too late and obviously was speeding so I deserved what I got.
We've all done it - Slowed down at the sign or just after it.

TBH though, I think entering a 30mph at over 50mph would have got the same result, regardless of the car you were driving.

The officer may have had a chip on his shoulder about you driving a 911, but had you been driving an old, battered Corsa, or any car in between (or above), I doubt it would have made any difference.

Durzel

12,999 posts

197 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
It’s more likely that it simply stood out as 911s do in a sea of crapola everyday cars. Probably wasn’t personal.