Datacenters cause as much CO2 as aviation
Datacenters cause as much CO2 as aviation
Author
Discussion

Glade

Original Poster:

4,481 posts

247 months

Wednesday 4th March 2020
quotequote all
Item on BBC news about the CO2 caused by electricity used in datacenters... apparently our mass usage of Netflix, YouTube and the like is as bad as the aviation industry... no stats on how much CO2 per episode of Breaking bad watched vs smashing it up in the bar on an A380 to Dubai.

Interesting, because I imagine a lot of right on preachy types are not thinking about the effect of streaming the flavour of the month... but I also cant imagine that watching Picard on Amazon prime is as bad as mincing over to China on a business ticket.

Hoofy

79,531 posts

306 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
I read somewhere that if you use your phone for an hour a day for a year it was the equivalent of 4 flights.

Roofless Toothless

7,187 posts

156 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
The cultivation of rice in paddyfields produces as much methane as the farming of ruminants.

Gargamel

16,163 posts

285 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Bitcoin’s carbon footprint is huge. One BC transaction uses enough electricity to supply a normal family house for two months.


PositronicRay

28,683 posts

207 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
I read somewhere that if you use your phone for an hour a day for a year it was the equivalent of 4 flights.
Think about that one for a moment. How much power does a smart phone consume?

mr_spock

3,371 posts

239 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Hoofy said:
I read somewhere that if you use your phone for an hour a day for a year it was the equivalent of 4 flights.
Think about that one for a moment. How much power does a smart phone consume?
I suspect they're also including a portion of the servers and network it takes to run the back end stuff like iCloud, AWS, app servers, mail servers, web servers you access and so on. And the 3G/4G network. And wifi.

Agammemnon

1,628 posts

82 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Fractionally off topic, I was involved in the installation of back-up generators for a pair of datacentres; there were four 20-litre quad turbo V16s each.

I suspect their carbon footprint would be significant.

DaveCWK

2,321 posts

198 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Gargamel said:
Bitcoin’s carbon footprint is huge. One BC transaction uses enough electricity to supply a normal family house for two months.
It's ridiculous isn't it - I'm surprised it doesn't get more coverage.

Gecko1978

12,302 posts

181 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
mr_spock said:
PositronicRay said:
Hoofy said:
I read somewhere that if you use your phone for an hour a day for a year it was the equivalent of 4 flights.
Think about that one for a moment. How much power does a smart phone consume?
I suspect they're also including a portion of the servers and network it takes to run the back end stuff like iCloud, AWS, app servers, mail servers, web servers you access and so on. And the 3G/4G network. And wifi.
Why not just say using stuff that needs energy uses as much energy as other stuff. Its total bks.

I bet if we looked up the energy used by say the Peleton on line bikes and extrapolate the results we could say in 1 day 4m Peleton users produced more C02 than a coal power station did in north North Korea on a mild day in August

Teddy Lop

8,301 posts

91 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Hoofy said:
I read somewhere that if you use your phone for an hour a day for a year it was the equivalent of 4 flights.
Think about that one for a moment. How much power does a smart phone consume?
most smartphones seem to hold around 3000mAh.

For comparison the battery in a PHEV/BEV car can be 4000-35,000 times that and a Boeing 777 can take off carrying around 670million times more in fuel energy capacity.

As for datacentres I'm not sure the comparison is all that valid, as its millions of people using tiny bits each for an enormous range of tasks, from essential to frivilous, many of which are more energy efficient than how you'd do the task traditionally ie pre mass internet.

biggles330d

2,431 posts

174 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
No idea of the numbers but it doesn't surprise me. Data centres use a lot of processing power, are processing an exponentially growing demand from all of us taking advantage of faster comms connections, exploding social media, personal connectivity and content being generated by each of us and more 'formal' producers.

Processing power generates heat, data centres need cooling - a lot of it, so masses of air conditioning. Up here in Scotland one of the big tech companies has started experimenting dropping data centres into the sea off the north coast as a means of reducing their need for air con and using cold sea temperatures to keep things cool.

Its like power generation I suppose - few end users (until relatively recently) really connected our individual use to smoke belching out of a coal fired power station as we all gorge on the output and availability of electricity. Out of sight, out of mind.

I was surprised at the news of 'hundreds of thousands' of data centres around the world, but the enormous power they consume doesn't surprise me at all.

Murph7355

40,984 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Gecko1978 said:
Why not just say using stuff that needs energy uses as much energy as other stuff. Its total bks.
....
That IS what these factoids are saying biggrin

Without wishing to get all Chris Packham about it, what is bks is whining about our impact on our environment without dealing with his elephant in the room.

It's the typical approach of the "right on". Tinker with the edges making no bloody difference other than irritating large swathes of the populous in an effort to make them feel better about themselves.

It'll end badly.

Pragmatism seems to be in short supply.

MrOrange

2,039 posts

277 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
I suspect a bit of a non-topic. Two of the top three providers of cloud services (AWS, Google & Azure) are mostly carbon neutral. The relentless greening of the ‘leccy grid will remove this as an issue this decade, I suspect. FYI, the average CO2 emissions of a single page view on the Internet is somewhere around 1-2g.

Swapping planes over to ‘leccy is a much tougher proposition.

rscott

17,071 posts

215 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
MrOrange said:
I suspect a bit of a non-topic. Two of the top three providers of cloud services (AWS, Google & Azure) are mostly carbon neutral. The relentless greening of the ‘leccy grid will remove this as an issue this decade, I suspect. FYI, the average CO2 emissions of a single page view on the Internet is somewhere around 1-2g.

Swapping planes over to ‘leccy is a much tougher proposition.
And the likes of Google are taking innovative steps to minimise their footprint, eg this repurposed paper mill - https://www.google.com/about/datacenters/locations...


Megaflow

11,144 posts

249 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Agammemnon said:
Fractionally off topic, I was involved in the installation of back-up generators for a pair of datacentres; there were four 20-litre quad turbo V16s each.

I suspect their carbon footprint would be significant.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they were a lot bigger than 20l. I saw a V16 genset once, that was 64l... yikes

ellroy

7,750 posts

249 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
You can add the Chinese coal mine fires to the issue, roughly 1% of global CO2 by some accounts, little bit more than the total for the U.K.

So best that we go back to the dark ages.

NGRhodes

1,291 posts

96 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Our team looks after some research HPC clusters, over 10000 cores high density + last gen still power d as currently still being retired. We are finding it very hard to calculate our energy usage or carbon footprint by any useful metric; shared data centre, but we use liquid cooled cabs, mixed energy sources make it ambiguous at any point in time. It is something we are wanting to monitor for our next gen of HPC and a can be used as a factor in future research project proposals.
We are very aware that we are the big elephant in the room when it comes to our University's sustainability desires.

Edited by NGRhodes on Thursday 5th March 09:16

bigandclever

14,240 posts

262 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Streaming grumble flicks generates as much CO2 per year as is emitted by countries such as Belgium, Bangladesh and Nigeria. So, ban Belgium.

FunkyNige

9,739 posts

299 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
The BBC stats podcast More or Less spoke a bit about this when there was some stat announced that an hour of Netflix was the same as driving 5 miles (or something like that, it turns out to be nonsense). From memory it's the same as driving 30 metres, or something like that. It's here if you want a listen (30 mins, I think the Netflix bit is about 10 minutes)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0819sc4

Similarly, the Radio 4 podcast The Digital Human had an episode exploring a town in America that has dirt cheap electricity that was swamped by people coming in and setting up BitCoin mining operations, from the sounds of it every vacant building was rented and a bunch of bitcoin mining rigs(?) put in. So much so that the council banned bitcoin mining operations for a while https://www.wcax.com/content/news/Plattsburgh-lift...
Link to the podcast here (30 mins)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000fpnk

turbobloke

116,073 posts

284 months

Thursday 5th March 2020
quotequote all
Here's a perspective to consider. Grasses, shrubs, crops, trees, phytoplankton, cyanobacteria and photosynthesising algae will be very grateful (to datacentres) and as they underpin the global food chain, so should we.

Global net ecosystem production increased by > 117 TgC per year between 1995 and 2014 with the vast majority of that increase (90%) due to 'aerial fertilization effects' from increased CO2 levels, see Fernández-Martínez et al. This hasn't stopped because Greta.