Bye bye EASA.
Author
Discussion

Tony1963

Original Poster:

5,808 posts

186 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
I’m not going to try to understand the long term repercussions of this, but I can’t see it being good.


IanH755

2,636 posts

144 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
My guess would be having the CAA use either a BASA agreement (like the EU has with the US/Canada & Brazil) or a WA agreement (like the EU has with almost everyone else) with EASA as not being a member state any more technically means we'd "leave" EASA but still be able to have "agreements" with it.

More info in the BBC article - basically CAA takes over (as expected). - https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51783580

Edited by IanH755 on Saturday 7th March 16:30

Simpo Two

91,480 posts

289 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Are any other non-EU countries in EASA?

LHRFlightman

2,210 posts

194 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
CAA have no idea how they're going to do this.

Also, looking forward to BA registering their aircraft in Spain and cutting 50% of CAAs funding.

IanH755

2,636 posts

144 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Are any other non-EU countries in EASA?
"In EASA" is a bit of a misnomer TBH as only EU nations are "in EASA" (they're called member states) however virtually the rest of world has some form of agreement with EASA. Here's the list of countries involved - https://www.easa.europa.eu/easa-and-you/internatio...

jaisharma

1,486 posts

207 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Perhaps our current government consider that the present standards are excessive....

djc206

13,429 posts

149 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
jaisharma said:
Perhaps our current government consider that the present standards are excessive....
Funnily enough last time I had a conversation with a chap from SARG at the CAA he was saying that EASA has long applied pressure to reduce costs in the UK through a reduction in spend on safety. Our Air Traffic Services (my area) are costly because we really care about safety vs other EASA compliant nations where the service provision is, I would I argue, fairly poor.

Simpo Two

91,480 posts

289 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
jaisharma said:
Perhaps our current government consider that the present standards are excessive....
Funnily enough last time I had a conversation with a chap from SARG at the CAA he was saying that EASA has long applied pressure to reduce costs in the UK through a reduction in spend on safety. Our Air Traffic Services (my area) are costly because we really care about safety vs other EASA compliant nations where the service provision is, I would I argue, fairly poor.
hehe Which rather blows a hole in the assumption that anything EU-based is Very Good and anything we do ourselves must be worse.

djc206

13,429 posts

149 months

Saturday 7th March 2020
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
hehe Which rather blows a hole in the assumption that anything EU-based is Very Good and anything we do ourselves must be worse.
A bit. The idea that we can get the CAA up to speed by the new year is utterly preposterous though. This is a poor decision and I can’t imagine there are many in the industry who would disagree with that statement.

Vanden Saab

17,380 posts

98 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
Simpo Two said:
hehe Which rather blows a hole in the assumption that anything EU-based is Very Good and anything we do ourselves must be worse.
A bit. The idea that we can get the CAA up to speed by the new year is utterly preposterous though. This is a poor decision and I can’t imagine there are many in the industry who would disagree with that statement.
Strange then that we signed bi-lateral agreements with the USA, Canada and Japan in March last year. Why would the EU not agree a similar agreement..... Oh wait...

silentbrown

10,506 posts

140 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
IanH755 said:
"In EASA" is a bit of a misnomer TBH as only EU nations are "in EASA" (they're called member states) however virtually the rest of world has some form of agreement with EASA. Here's the list of countries involved - https://www.easa.europa.eu/easa-and-you/internatio...
EFTA countries are full members of EASA too.

IforB

9,840 posts

253 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
This is the stupidest thing I have ever seen in politics and that is saying something.

We truly have the most incompetent government any of us have ever seen.

anonymous-user

78 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
The government statement says it all.

“However, a Department for Transport (DfT) spokeswoman said EASA membership was "not compatible" with the UK having "genuine economic and political independence".”

Despite airlines, industry bodies etc all arguing to stay in EASA.


MarkwG

5,850 posts

213 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
Simpo Two said:
hehe Which rather blows a hole in the assumption that anything EU-based is Very Good and anything we do ourselves must be worse.
A bit. The idea that we can get the CAA up to speed by the new year is utterly preposterous though. This is a poor decision and I can’t imagine there are many in the industry who would disagree with that statement.
Currently, EASA set minimum standards for members, so that those developing countries, or those with a small aviation community, aren't heavily penalised by having standards forced upon them at great expense, unnecessarily. Countries that have a well developed, robust aviation system, are usually those that have the most influence anyway, which included us; in broad terms, they can continue to apply their standard by submitting an Acceptable Means of Compliance. That won't be an option once we leave, we'll need to apply ICAO word for word, which will upset a few GA pilots, I suspect.

Working with EASA isn't necessarily that difficult once you understand the system, hence there is no need to "leave", it's purely about the politics. I agree, there's no way the CAA is any shape to take over the full regulatory role. Ironically, most of the EASA changes have been about falling in line with ICAO - the difference is, we won't have a decent seat at the table to put our voice across. I imagine the nominally UK airlines will deregister, so that includes Easyjet, TUI & British Airways, who'll then move their engineering bases across to the continent - so perhaps the CAA won't have that much to do...

Vanden Saab

17,380 posts

98 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
El stovey said:
The government statement says it all.

“However, a Department for Transport (DfT) spokeswoman said EASA membership was "not compatible" with the UK having "genuine economic and political independence".”

Despite airlines, industry bodies etc all arguing to stay in EASA.
Apparently you cannot be a easa member unless you are in the Eu hence the incompatibility as discussed in the Eu thread but what do I know I am a tiler...

Countdown

47,555 posts

220 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
djc206 said:
jaisharma said:
Perhaps our current government consider that the present standards are excessive....
Funnily enough last time I had a conversation with a chap from SARG at the CAA he was saying that EASA has long applied pressure to reduce costs in the UK through a reduction in spend on safety. Our Air Traffic Services (my area) are costly because we really care about safety vs other EASA compliant nations where the service provision is, I would I argue, fairly poor.
So are "our [CAA] standards excessive/ expensive or is it EASA standards that are weak"?

is this an example of the situation where the UK tends to take EU guidelines and then goldplates them?

anonymous-user

78 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
Vanden Saab said:
El stovey said:
The government statement says it all.

“However, a Department for Transport (DfT) spokeswoman said EASA membership was "not compatible" with the UK having "genuine economic and political independence".”

Despite airlines, industry bodies etc all arguing to stay in EASA.
Apparently you cannot be a easa member unless you are in the Eu hence the incompatibility as discussed in the Eu thread but what do I know I am a tiler...
Are you sure? Do you mean the single market. Some countries are EASA members but not in the EU. How much has the U.K. government explored remaining in EASA.

Your comments are based on someone on Twitter if you read the twitter thread it’s progressed more and the original poster has even admitted he doesn’t know if the U.K. could remain in EASA






In the meantime the U.K. has announced its leaving EASA.

anonymous-user

78 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Are any other non-EU countries in EASA?
Yes a few but I think they’re classed as associate member states like Iceland, Norway and Switzerland so they likely still have some single market connections.

https://www.easa.europa.eu/country-category/easa-m...

aeropilot

39,788 posts

251 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Are any other non-EU countries in EASA?
Yes.

Iceland, Lichtenstein, Norway and Switzerland are non-EU members of EASA, but, the key point I believe, is that to be even a non-EU member of EASA would mean accepting the European Court of Justice as the legal arbitrator, and the UK has made it quite clear that's not an option........in fact its been a sticking point even when the UK was in the EU.

cb31

1,372 posts

160 months

Sunday 8th March 2020
quotequote all
MarkwG said:
Working with EASA isn't necessarily that difficult once you understand the system, hence there is no need to "leave", it's purely about the politics.
As far as I understand the final arbiter of EASA is the ECJ. We don't want ECJ oversight so have to leave.