Coronavirus and insurance conspiracy
Coronavirus and insurance conspiracy
Author
Discussion

R Mutt

Original Poster:

5,896 posts

96 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
I keep reading how Boris merely advised against visiting establishments rather than mandating that they close, so as to avoid any insurance payouts by 'his friends in the City' as the party indeed accepted donations from BIBA.

Today someone daubed 'Pandemic to Class War' on a local wall presumably in response to this (despire local publicans and restaurateurs having migrated from the Home Counties this effecting the gentrification so bemoaned by the same people).

However pandemic is the operative word thus forming an exclusion on many a business interruption insurance policy. Further there is the condition of 'notifiable disease' which I did not encounter during my brief stint in the industry.

Could someone please offer up the technicalities?


TPSA7514

741 posts

81 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
This thread is crap.

waynedear

2,351 posts

191 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
TPSA7514 said:
This thread is crap.
Think you are being kind there.

R Mutt

Original Poster:

5,896 posts

96 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
Yes it's lacking clarification on the standard business interruption exclusions in terms of communicable diseases. So are the idiots who keep spreading the fake news that it's Boris' fault that businesses won't be paid out

gooner1

10,223 posts

203 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
R Mutt said:
Yes it's lacking clarification on the standard business interruption exclusions in terms of communicable diseases. So are the idiots who keep spreading the fake news that it's Boris' fault that businesses won't be paid out
Apologies if I've just misheard a comment on Politics Live just now, but I believe an Insurance
spokesman has just confirmed that business will in fact not be covered.
Only half listening so fully aware I could be massively wrong. Again.


i4got

5,928 posts

102 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
gooner1 said:
R Mutt said:
Yes it's lacking clarification on the standard business interruption exclusions in terms of communicable diseases. So are the idiots who keep spreading the fake news that it's Boris' fault that businesses won't be paid out
Apologies if I've just misheard a comment on Politics Live just now, but I believe an Insurance
spokesman has just confirmed that business will in fact not be covered.
Only half listening so fully aware I could be massively wrong. Again.
Your'e not wrong. On BBC site.

More now on the issue of whether venues in the UK can claim on insurance if they're not ordered to close by the government.

Pubs, restaurants and theatres in the UK are hitting out at Boris Johnson's advice to the public yesterday - telling them not to visit the venues, without ordering businesses to close.

Many from the entertainment industry say without a direct order from government, they will not be protected by their insurance.

But the Association of British Insurers claims most companies would not be covered anyway, even if there were to be a dictat from Downing Street.

In a statement, the organisation says: "Standard business interruption cover - the type the majority of businesses purchase - does not include forced closure by authorities as it is intended to respond to physical damage at the property which results in the business being unable to continue to trade.

"A small minority of typically larger firms might have purchased an extension to their cover for closure due to any infectious disease. In this instance, an enforced closure could help them make the claim.

"But this will depend on the precise nature of the cover they have purchased, so they should check with their insurer or broker to see if they are covered."

gooner1

10,223 posts

203 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
i4got said:
Your'e not wrong. On BBC site.

More now on the issue of whether venues in the UK can claim on insurance if they're not ordered to close by the government.

Pubs, restaurants and theatres in the UK are hitting out at Boris Johnson's advice to the public yesterday - telling them not to visit the venues, without ordering businesses to close.

Many from the entertainment industry say without a direct order from government, they will not be protected by their insurance.



But the Association of British Insurers claims most companies would not be covered anyway, even if there were to be a dictat from Downing Street.

In a statement, the organisation says: "Standard business interruption cover - the type the majority of businesses purchase - does not include forced closure by authorities as it is intended to respond to physical damage at the property which results in the business being unable to continue to trade.

"A small minority of typically larger firms might have purchased an extension to their cover for closure due to any infectious disease. In this instance, an enforced closure could help them make the claim.

"But this will depend on the precise nature of the cover they have purchased, so they should check with their insurer or broker to see if they are covered."
st. I was actually hoping I was wrong.

R Mutt

Original Poster:

5,896 posts

96 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
So they're not covered anyway and this is fake news?

https://twitter.com/prodnose/status/12396933584880...

TPSA7514

741 posts

81 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
waynedear said:
TPSA7514 said:
This thread is crap.
Think you are being kind there.
Wait till that Ded 4 character shows up.
It will get livelier then

Foliage

3,861 posts

146 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
great idea, but most businesses aren't insured against forced government closure due to a viral pandemic.

gooner1

10,223 posts

203 months

Electro1980

8,934 posts

163 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
Most=\= all. I don’t know if this has any impact on the governments choice, but it’s clear to me that there must be some businesses that are covered.

don'tbesilly

15,362 posts

187 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
yes, but no, but yes...........if Boris had had the foresight to name the virus before it appeared then businesses would have been covered, but like everything else, Boris will always get the blame.

If I was Boris I'd be blaming..................... Dilyn

warp9

1,632 posts

221 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
This is the problem with modern media. Everyone is sensationalizing what if's without knowing the facts and details. The only way a business is going to know if they have cover for business interruption is to check their policy wording - it will be different from policy to policy. We're an SME employing 45 people and are covered, this is our policy wording:

4 Disease, Murder, Suicide, Vermin and Pests Loss as a result of
A) closure or restrictions placed on the Premises on the advice or with the approval of the Medical Officer of Health of the Public Authority as a result of a notifiable human disease manifesting itself at the Premises.

Maxf

8,441 posts

265 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
warp9 said:
This is the problem with modern media. Everyone is sensationalizing what if's without knowing the facts and details. The only way a business is going to know if they have cover for business interruption is to check their policy wording - it will be different from policy to policy. We're an SME employing 45 people and are covered, this is our policy wording:

4 Disease, Murder, Suicide, Vermin and Pests Loss as a result of
A) closure or restrictions placed on the Premises on the advice or with the approval of the Medical Officer of Health of the Public Authority as a result of a notifiable human disease manifesting itself at the Premises.
So one of your staff has to test positive?

warp9

1,632 posts

221 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
Maxf said:
warp9 said:
This is the problem with modern media. Everyone is sensationalizing what if's without knowing the facts and details. The only way a business is going to know if they have cover for business interruption is to check their policy wording - it will be different from policy to policy. We're an SME employing 45 people and are covered, this is our policy wording:

4 Disease, Murder, Suicide, Vermin and Pests Loss as a result of
A) closure or restrictions placed on the Premises on the advice or with the approval of the Medical Officer of Health of the Public Authority as a result of a notifiable human disease manifesting itself at the Premises.
So one of your staff has to test positive?
In theory yes, but let's see how it pans out. At the moment all our staff bar one is at work. We'll obviously follow government guidelines as I'm sure everyone else will.

gooner1

10,223 posts

203 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
warp9 said:
This is the problem with modern media. Everyone is sensationalizing what if's without knowing the facts and details. The only way a business is going to know if they have cover for business interruption is to check their policy wording - it will be different from policy to policy. We're an SME employing 45 people and are covered, this is our policy wording:

4 Disease, Murder, Suicide, Vermin and Pests Loss as a result of
A) closure or restrictions placed on the Premises on the advice or with the approval of the Medical Officer of Health of the Public Authority as a result of a notifiable human disease manifesting itself at the Premises.


Good points.

warp9

1,632 posts

221 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
If this point is directed at me... At this point, to our knowledge, indeed none. We've been following basic hygiene practices for the last 3 weeks and have had 2 staff that have phoned 111 due to concerns, both of which were deemed common colds and low risk.

However the net is closing in. I'm aware of 3 staff that know of 'a friend of a friend' that has it. I expect in the coming days/week for someone here to be infected.

R Mutt

Original Poster:

5,896 posts

96 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
warp9 said:
This is the problem with modern media. Everyone is sensationalizing what if's without knowing the facts and details. The only way a business is going to know if they have cover for business interruption is to check their policy wording - it will be different from policy to policy. We're an SME employing 45 people and are covered, this is our policy wording:
Yes celebrities (Danny Baker) and MPs (David Lammy) are making the explicit claim that businesses would be covered if only the Prime Minister would force them to close.

cossy400

3,425 posts

208 months

Tuesday 17th March 2020
quotequote all
But if the powers that be are telling the general public to avoid XYZ places until further notice, surely with out any financial help from the the powers that be, thats just going to cause mass unemployment and businesses going to the wall left right and centre.


Shutting schools means parents of work unpaid (some i know) avoiding certain outlets of enjoyment will mean staff not getting paid/laid off.

Zero hour contracts those people are going to be the first to go.

Surely instead of drip feeding closures and avoidance measures its time to just shut up shop like the rest of the world?

Im not clever enough to tell you how it could work but to me the "plan" at he moment is just to drip feed the country in to a world of st.